<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
<ui>1741-7007-11-6</ui>
<ji>1741-7007</ji>
<fm>
<dochead>Research article</dochead>
<bibl>
<title><p>Shift happens: trailing edge contraction associated with recent warming trends threatens a distinct genetic lineage in the marine macroalga <it>Fucus vesiculosus</it></p></title>
<aug>
<au id="A1" ce="yes"><snm>Nicastro</snm><mi>R</mi><fnm>Katy</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>katynicastro@yahoo.it</email></au>
<au id="A2" ca="yes" ce="yes"><snm>Zardi</snm><mi>I</mi><fnm>Gerardo</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>zardi73@yahoo.it</email></au>
<au id="A3"><snm>Teixeira</snm><fnm>Sara</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>saralteixeira@hotmail.com</email></au>
<au id="A4"><snm>Neiva</snm><fnm>Jo&#227;o</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>jmneiva@ualg.pt</email></au>
<au id="A5"><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><mi>A</mi><fnm>Ester</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>eserrao@ualg.pt</email></au>
<au id="A6"><snm>Pearson</snm><mi>A</mi><fnm>Gareth</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>gpearson@ualg.pt</email></au>
</aug>
<insg>
<ins id="I1"><p>CCMAR - CIMAR Laborat&#243;rio Associado, Universidade do Algarve - Campus de Gambelas, Faro, 8005-139 Portugal</p></ins>
</insg>
<source>BMC Biology</source>
<issn>1741-7007</issn>
<pubdate>2013</pubdate>
<volume>11</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>6</fpage>
<url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/11/6</url>
<xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1741-7007-11-6</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">23342999</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl>
<history><rec><date><day>2</day><month>10</month><year>2012</year></date></rec><acc><date><day>23</day><month>1</month><year>2013</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>23</day><month>1</month><year>2013</year></date></pub></history><cpyrt><year>2013</year><collab>Nicastro et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab><note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
<kwdg>
<kwd>Climate change</kwd>
<kwd>geographic boundaries</kwd>
<kwd>microsatellites</kwd>
<kwd>cryptic genetic erosion</kwd>
<kwd>sea surface temperature</kwd>
</kwdg>
<abs>
<sec><st><p>Abstract</p></st>
<sec><st><p>Background</p></st>
<p>Significant effects of recent global climate change have already been observed in a variety of ecosystems, with evidence for shifts in species ranges, but rarely have such consequences been related to the changes in the species genetic pool. The stretch of Atlantic coast between North Africa and North Iberia is ideal for studying the relationship between species distribution and climate change as it includes the distributional limits of a considerable number of both cold- and warm-water species.</p>
<p>We compared temporal changes in distribution of the canopy-forming alga <it>Fucus vesiculosus </it>with historical sea surface temperature (SST) patterns to draw links between range shifts and contemporary climate change. Moreover, we genetically characterized with microsatellite markers previously sampled extinct and extant populations in order to estimate resulting cryptic genetic erosion.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><p>Results</p></st>
<p>Over the past 30 years, a geographic contraction of the southern range edge of this species has occurred, with a northward latitudinal shift of approximately 1,250 km. Additionally, a more restricted distributional decline was recorded in the Bay of Biscay. Coastal SST warming data over the last three decades revealed a significant increase in temperature along most of the studied coastline, averaging 0.214&#176;C/decade. Importantly, the analysis of existing and extinct population samples clearly distinguished two genetically different groups, a northern and a southern clade. Because of the range contraction, the southern group is currently represented by very few extant populations. This southern edge range shift is thus causing the loss of a distinct component of the species genetic background.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><p>Conclusions</p></st>
<p>We reveal a climate-correlated diversity loss below the species level, a process that could render the species more vulnerable to future environmental changes and affect its evolutionary potential. This is a remarkable case of genetic uniqueness of a vanishing cryptic genetic clade (southern clade).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</abs>
</fm>
<bdy>
<sec><st><p>Background</p></st>
<p>Global climate change has a profound influence on distributional patterns of a wide variety of taxa causing species range shifts and population extinctions <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr></abbrgrp>. Poleward movements in latitude or increases in altitude have been observed in several geographic regions and for many species' ranges (for example, <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp>) but the effects of contemporary climatic change at the so-called trailing edges have received considerably less attention.</p>
<p>Although several studies have addressed phylogeographic responses to millennial-scale climate variability <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp>, surprisingly few empirical studies have investigated how contemporary climate change on decadal scales impacts genetic diversity <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr></abbrgrp>. Climate-driven range reduction can have significant genetic and evolutionary consequences for surviving populations by decreasing genetic diversity and hindering a population's ability to adapt to future ecological disturbances (for example, <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>). Most studies investigating the effects of climate change on biodiversity consider a species as a unit and thus overlook intraspecific genetic variation. However, vulnerability to genetic depauperation depends on the geographical distribution of genetic diversity within a species; for those in which diversity is relatively homogeneous throughout the distributional range the genetic effect of range contraction is largely independent of which part of the range is lost (for example, <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr></abbrgrp>). However, genetic depletion will strongly depend on which part of the range is affected for species with a geographically skewed distribution of genetic diversity (for example, <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp>).</p>
<p>Current geographical distribution of genetic diversity reflects both contemporary and historical events. Populations that are currently geographically peripheral may be particularly vulnerable to loss of genetic diversity because they are often restricted to decreasing habitat areas within unsuitable landscape. Their small size and prolonged isolation is accompanied by loss of within-population genetic diversity and increased inter-population genetic divergence due to increased random genetic drift, probability of suffering bottleneck effects, and reduced gene flow <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr></abbrgrp>. Previous climatic changes such as the glacial episodes of the Quaternary have left marked genetic signatures in present-day geographical distribution of genetic diversity. In particular, lower latitude regions where populations persisted through multiple glacial cycles (that is, glacial refugia), often host populations with higher genetic diversity than those in areas that were recolonized (for example, <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp>). Importantly, marginal refugial populations that did not play a role in postglacial colonization processes have considerable conservation value because they may harbor unique genetic variation that is threatened by recent climate warming <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>The stretch of Atlantic coast between North Africa and Iberia is ideal for the study of the relationship between marine species distribution and possible effects of climatic warming because a considerable number of both cold- and warm-water species reach their distributional limits within this stretch of coast (for example, <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr></abbrgrp>). In addition, several studies have described species distributional ranges and abundance clines since the middle of the 20th century in conjunction with abundant museum and herbarium data (for example, <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr><abbr bid="B28">28</abbr><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr></abbrgrp>), providing a solid historical background for studies aiming to describe changes in species distribution or abundance associated with environmental changes.</p>
<p>Surveys carried out in the last decade along the Atlantic Iberian Peninsula have correlated increasing sea surface temperature (SST) to striking expansion or contraction events <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr></abbrgrp>. SST is the prevailing factor controlling geographic distributions of many marine species at a latitudinal scale, either via direct effects on thermal tolerance or indirectly through changes in competition or predation dynamics <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr><abbr bid="B35">35</abbr><abbr bid="B36">36</abbr></abbrgrp>. While this is a recent worldwide trend, single-species response may be highly variable <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr></abbrgrp> and generalizations about poleward range shifts due to increasing temperature are not always possible <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B37">37</abbr><abbr bid="B38">38</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>In this study, the model species selected was <it>Fucus vesiculosus</it>, an intertidal canopy-forming brown alga. The availability of records on the species distribution along North African and Iberian Atlantic shores and of DNA from recently extinct populations provides an ideal opportunity to investigate the impact of climate-driven range reduction on the overall species genetic diversity.</p>
<p>We investigate shifts in the southern distribution endpoints of <it>F. vesiculosus </it>during the last three decades along this stretch of coast. Resulting biogeographic dynamics are compared with SST warming trends in order to correlate range shifts with the intensity of climatic change in the region. We further draw on genetic data from extant populations and others that have recently become extinct (previously sampled) in a phylogeographic approach to test the extent to which unique genetic variation may be lost as a result of climate change and range contraction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><p>Results</p></st>
<sec><st><p>Past and present distributions and endpoints</p></st>
<p>A literature review located the historical southern endpoint of <it>F. vesiculosus </it>in Southern Morocco at Khnifiss Lagoon (27&#176;59'40.82"N-12&#176;16'33.98"W; Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). Its presence at this location was last reported in 1985-1986 and it was also confirmed by the Institut Scientifique, D&#233;partement de Botanique et d'Ecologie V&#233;g&#233;tale in Rabat (personal communication by Dr. Ibn Tattou Mohamed; see Additional file <supplr sid="S1">1</supplr>).</p>
<fig id="F1"><title><p>Figure 1</p></title><caption><p>Study locations</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Study locations</b>. (<b>a</b>) A map of the study area; dots are locations surveyed for <it>Fucus vesiculosus </it>during 2009-2011, presence or absence of species is marked in green and red, respectively; the asterisk (*) depicts the species historical southern distribution limit; names of population samples used for genetic analyses are reported, their codes are given in brackets and those in bold represent extinct populations; (<b>b</b>) a map depicting the complete northeastern Atlantic distribution of <it>F. vesiculosus</it>.</p>
</text><graphic file="1741-7007-11-6-1"/></fig>
<suppl id="S1">
<title><p>Additional file 1</p></title>
<text><p><b>List of locations surveyed</b>. Name and coordinates of locations surveyed during 2009-2011, ordered from north to south. Presence/absence of the species and latest known year of its presence is also reported.</p></text>
<file name="1741-7007-11-6-S1.DOCX">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
<p>The southern endpoint is now positioned on the Portuguese west coast in the Tejo estuary (38&#176;45'38.99"N, 8&#176;56'28.43"W), representing an 11&#176; latitude shift (1,250 km range contraction; Figure <figr fid="F2">2b</figr>). In addition, an isolated population was located in Cadiz-Puerto Real (36&#176;31'27.53"N, 6&#176;10'52.61"W) approximately in the middle of this range contraction and unattached vegetative fragments of adult <it>F. vesiculosus </it>were still observed entangled in <it>Spartina </it>grass in Ria Formosa (37&#176;00'36"N, 7&#176;59'31"W), although the previously permanent and attached populations have totally disappeared from this coastal lagoon.</p>
<fig id="F2"><title><p>Figure 2</p></title><caption><p>Species distribution and temperature trends along the study area</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Species distribution and temperature trends along the study area</b>. (<b>a</b>) Coastal SST warming data over the last three decades (&#176;C/decade; 1982 to 2011) based on AVHRR, NOAA Optimum Interpolation &#188; Degree Daily Sea Surface Temperature Analysis data. Arrows indicate areas of intense upwelling. (<b>b</b>) Current and past distribution and endpoints of <it>F. vesiculosus </it>based on data from our field survey (2009 to 2011) and on literature information and herbarium collections, red and green lines are contractions and present distribution, respectively. (<b>c</b>) Monthly averaged (2009 to 2011) sea surface temperature; 4 km resolution based on MODIS-Aqua dataset. MODIS-Aqua, Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer-Aqua; SST, sea surface temperature.</p>
</text><graphic file="1741-7007-11-6-2"/></fig>
<p>Historically, <it>F. vesiculosus </it>populations were reported along the whole Northern Iberian coastline, with the latest presences at north eastern locations dated from 1951 to 1988. Currently, a limited retreat of 70 km within the Bay of Biscay has occurred and the present endpoint is at Colindres, eastern Cantabria (43&#176;23'36.63"N, 3&#176;27'50.15"W).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><p>Temperature trends</p></st>
<p>Temperature isotherms shifted polewards to higher latitudes (Figure <figr fid="F2">2c</figr>). This gradient is interrupted by areas of strong and persistent upwelling. In particular, in Morocco, the constant upwelling off Cape Ghir (centered at 31&#176;N) generates a clear cold thermal intermission. Other upwelling cells are present to the south (Western Sahara), but fall outside the distributional range of <it>F. vesiculosus</it>. In contrast to North African shores, upwelling waters off north-west Iberian shores contribute to the SST gradient.</p>
<p>Over the last 30 years, a significant increase of coastal SST (&#176;C/decade; Figure <figr fid="F2">2a</figr>) was observed throughout most of the entire Iberian and North African Atlantic coast. Coastal warming rates were not significant at relatively restricted areas within upwelling cells off Morocco (between 31&#176;22' and 32&#176;22') and Western Sahara (between 24&#176;22' and 25&#176;52'). In non-upwelling areas, coastal SST warming ranged from 0.092 to 0.297&#176;C/decade, with an average of 0.214&#176;C.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><p>Genetic analyses</p></st>
<p>Previously sampled <it>F. vesiculosus </it>collected in 2001 and 2002 from 12 locations, including four extinct populations (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>), were genotyped at five microsatellite loci. The whole dataset (668 individuals genotyped) was highly polymorphic and the total numbers of alleles per locus were: 17 (locus 20; Additional file <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr>), 8 (locus 58; Additional file <supplr sid="S3">3</supplr>), 11 (locus 94; Additional file <supplr sid="S4">4</supplr>), 14 (locus 78; Additional file <supplr sid="S5">5</supplr>) and 9 (locus 38; Additional file <supplr sid="S6">6</supplr>).</p>
<suppl id="S2">
<title><p>Additional file 2</p></title>
<text><p><b>Allele frequencies for locus L20</b>. Codes correspond to locations in Figure 1, locations belonging to the southern lineage are encircled and extinct populations are shown in bold. The actual values of frequencies are represented by dots of varying diameter: allele codes are indicated on the x axis and population names on the y axis.</p></text>
<file name="1741-7007-11-6-S2.TIFF">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
<suppl id="S3">
<title><p>Additional file 3</p></title>
<text><p><b>Allele frequencies for locus L58</b>. Codes correspond to locations in Figure 1, locations belonging to the southern lineage are encircled and extinct populations are shown in bold. The actual values of frequencies are represented by dots of varying diameter: allele codes are indicated on the x axis and population names on the y axis.</p></text>
<file name="1741-7007-11-6-S3.TIFF">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
<suppl id="S4">
<title><p>Additional file 4</p></title>
<text><p><b>Allele frequencies for locus L94</b>. Codes correspond to locations in Figure 1, locations belonging to the southern lineage are encircled and extinct populations are shown in bold. The actual values of frequencies are represented by dots of varying diameter: allele codes are indicated on the x axis and population names on the y axis.</p></text>
<file name="1741-7007-11-6-S4.TIFF">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
<suppl id="S5">
<title><p>Additional file 5</p></title>
<text><p><b>Allele frequencies for locus L78</b>. Codes correspond to locations in Figure 1, locations belonging to the southern lineage are encircled and extinct populations are shown in bold. The actual values of frequencies are represented by dots of varying diameter: allele codes are indicated on the x axis and population names on the y axis.</p></text>
<file name="1741-7007-11-6-S5.TIFF">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
<suppl id="S6">
<title><p>Additional file 6</p></title>
<text><p><b>Allele frequencies for locus L38</b>. Codes correspond to locations in Figure 1, locations belonging to the southern lineage are encircled and extinct populations are shown in bold. The actual values of frequencies are represented by dots of varying diameter: allele codes are indicated on the x axis and population names on the y axis.</p></text>
<file name="1741-7007-11-6-S6.TIFF">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
<p>Allelic richness (<it>&#194;</it>) varied between 6.28 and 3.08 with lowest values for ML, RF, TV and LX, while unbiased heterozygosity (<it>H</it><sub>E</sub>) ranged between 0.381 and 0.587 with highest gene diversity values for RE, VN, RL and RM (location codes as reported in Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). Observed heterozygosity (<it>H</it><sub>O</sub>) was significantly different from <it>H</it><sub>E </sub>in nine locations where heterozygote deficiency was detected, resulting in significant positive values of the inbreeding coefficient <it>F</it><sub>IS </sub>(Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). The high values of <it>F</it><sub>IS </sub>obtained were not locus dependent, indicating the markers used did not display technical issues such as null alleles. Unique alleles were detected for 8 of the 12 populations and varied between one and three.</p>
<tbl id="T1"><title><p>Table 1</p></title><caption><p>Genetic diversity of each population.</p></caption><tblbdy cols="7">
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Location</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>N</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>H</it>
                  <sub>E</sub>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>H</it>
                  <sub>O</sub>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>F</it>
                  <sub>IS</sub>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b><it>&#194;</it><sub>20 </sub>&#177; SD</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>UAN</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="7">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>OV</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>21</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.489</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.498</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.009</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>4.76&#177;0.089</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>RE</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>29</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.587</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.401</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.336<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>6.28&#177;0.303</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>LG</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>48</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.420</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.342</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.197<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>5.12&#177;0.335</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>VN</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>94</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.583</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.509</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.132<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>4.52&#177;0.415</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>RL</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>48</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.571</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.377</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.349<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>5.04&#177;0.358</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>ML</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>48</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.486</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.388</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.213<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.44&#177;0.434</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>MG</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>96</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.457</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.437</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.050</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>4.20&#177;0.200</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>TJ</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>96</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.381</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.346</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.096<sup>a</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>4.16&#177;0.297</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>RM</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>48</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.580</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.318</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.460<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>4.48&#177;0.303</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>RF</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>48</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.410</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.380</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.083</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.44&#177;0.219</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>TV</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>48</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.433</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.361</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.177<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.44&#177;0.434</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>LX</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>44</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.323</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.218</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.335<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.08&#177;0.228</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p><sup>a</sup>
&lt;0.05 and <sup>b</sup>
&lt;0.001 using 10,000 permutations. Codes correspond to locations in Figure 1 and are ordered from north to south, bold letters are extinct populations; N, sample sizes; <it>H</it><sub>O </sub>and <it>H</it><sub>E</sub>, observed and expected heterozygosity; <it>F</it><sub>IS</sub>, inbreeding coefficient with significant values. <it>&#194;</it><sub>20</sub>, mean allelic richness normalized to the smallest sample size; SD, standard deviation of <it>&#194;</it><sub>20</sub>; UAN, unique allelic number.</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<p>Strong differentiation among populations was found as estimated by pairwise genetic differentiations <it>F</it><sub>ST </sub>and <it>D</it><sub>EST </sub>values (10,000 permutations, <it>P </it>&lt; 0.01 for all comparisons, see Additional file <supplr sid="S7">7</supplr>; all confidence intervals do not overlap with zero, see Additional file <supplr sid="S8">8</supplr>). Pairwise differentiation was lower within two subgroups (hereafter 'northern' group: OV, RE, LG, VN, RL, ML; and 'southern' group: MG, TJ, RM, RF, TV, LX; location codes as reported in Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). However, <it>D</it><sub>EST </sub>estimates were particularly high between RE and all the other locations whereas LX and TJ had the lowest divergence.</p>
<suppl id="S7">
<title><p>Additional file 7</p></title>
<text><p><b>Genetic differentiation between pairs of populations</b>. Codes correspond to locations in Figure 1 and are ordered from north to south, bold characters are extinct populations. Genetic differentiations (<it>F<sub>ST</sub></it>) were estimated with the estimator <it>&#952;</it>, and are reported above the diagonal while Jost's <it>D</it><sub>EST </sub>are reported below the diagonal. All values are significant at <it>P </it>&lt;0.001 after multiple test correction.</p></text>
<file name="1741-7007-11-6-S7.DOCX">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
<suppl id="S8">
<title><p>Additional file 8</p></title>
<text><p><b>Confidence intervals of the genetic differentiation between pairs of populations</b>. Codes correspond to locations in Figure 1 and are ordered from north to south, bold characters are extinct populations. Confidence intervals of genetic differentiation (<it>F<sub>ST</sub></it>) are reported above the diagonal.</p></text>
<file name="1741-7007-11-6-S8.DOCX">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
<p>On the basis of the dimensions scores of the Correspondence Analyses (CA), populations were grouped into two major clusters corresponding to the northern and the southern subgroups (Figure <figr fid="F3">3a</figr>). The first axis explains mostly the variance between these two clades (34.86%), while the second and third axes mainly illustrate the differentiation within the two subgroups (13.48% and 11.77%, respectively). Overall, the northern group had a higher inter-population diversity, which is illustrated by the more scattered distribution of the points in the plot. The CA is consistent with the tree topology based on allele frequencies using Cavalli Sforza and Edwards' chord distance (Figure <figr fid="F3">3b</figr>), where two main branches were resolved. The first of these two subgroups comprised six populations (northern group). A second subgroup (southern group) consisted of six populations, two of which are still present at the locations while the rest are now extinct. This major genetic subdivision was supported by the results obtained with STRUCTURE, which revealed the most significant increase at &#916;K = 2 clusters (Figure <figr fid="F4">4a</figr>), thereafter &#916;K remained unchanged. We concluded that K = 2 is the most likely number of genetic clusters (Figure <figr fid="F4">4b</figr>).</p>
<fig id="F3"><title><p>Figure 3</p></title><caption><p>Correspondence Analyses and Neighbor-Joining tree</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Correspondence Analyses and Neighbor-Joining tree</b>. (<b>a</b>) Correspondence Analyses based on allele frequencies at five microsatellite loci. Percentages of inertia are shown between parentheses for each axis. (<b>b</b>) Neighbor-Joining tree inferred from Cavalli-Sforza and Edwards's pairwise distances; only bootstrap values higher than 50 are shown. Codes correspond to locations in Figure 1, locations belonging to the southern lineage are encircled and extinct populations are shown in bold.</p>
</text><graphic file="1741-7007-11-6-3"/></fig>
<fig id="F4"><title><p>Figure 4</p></title><caption><p>Histogram of STRUCTURE assignment of genotypes to clusters</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Histogram of STRUCTURE assignment of genotypes to clusters</b>. (<b>a</b>) Plot of deltaK (an ad hoc statistic based on the rate of change in the log probability of data between successive <it>K </it>values and used to predict the real number of clusters <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B101">101</abbr></abbrgrp>) where the modal value of the distribution is considered as the highest level of structuring, in our case two clusters. (<b>b</b>) Genetic structure of populations defined by STRUCTURE software where each vertical bar represents an individual. The membership for each individual is indicated by partitioning the corresponding line into several parts with different colors. Codes correspond to locations in Figure 1 and extinct populations are shown in bold.</p>
</text><graphic file="1741-7007-11-6-4"/></fig>
<p>The northern group had many unique alleles, but the southern cluster including the now extinct populations also displayed unique alleles. This cluster suffered diversity loss with the recent extinctions, but still retains unique diversity (three unique alleles detected in five loci assessed, at MG, TJ; Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>).</p>
<tbl id="T2"><title><p>Table 2</p></title><caption><p>Genetic diversity of each cluster.</p></caption><tblbdy cols="4">
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>H</it>
                  <sub>E</sub>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b><it>&#194; </it><sub>280/190 </sub>&#177; SD <it>&#194; </it><sub>280/190</sub></b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>UAN</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Northern cluster</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.6281</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>11.9/11.2&#177;0.11/0.26</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>16</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Southern cluster-past</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.545</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>9.08/n.a&#177;0.3/n.a</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>4</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Southern cluster-present</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.4934</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>n.a./7.8 &#177; n.a./0</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>Northern cluster include locations OV, RE, LG, VN, RL, Ml, southern cluster-past include MG, TJ, RM, RF, TV, LX while southern cluster-present is formed only by extant populations of this latter clade (MG and TJ). <it>H</it><sub>E</sub>, expected heterozygosity; <it>&#194;</it><sub>280/190</sub>, mean allelic richness normalized to the smallest sample size of the pooled clusters (N = 280/190); SD <it>&#194;</it><sub>280/190</sub>, standard deviation of <it>&#194;</it><sub>280/190</sub>; UAN, unique allelic number.</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><st><p>Discussion</p></st>
<p>A rapid and extensive range contraction of the southern border of a marine intertidal species occurred, with a northward shift of the historical limit of about 11&#176; latitude. This remarkable distributional shift consists of a latitudinal reduction of about 23% of the entire species range along eastern Atlantic shores and has resulted in the erosion of a cryptic evolutionary lineage at this trailing edge. Additionally, the range contraction is consistent with significant increases in SST throughout most of the coastal area studied.</p>
<sec><st><p>Range shift in southern Iberia</p></st>
<p>Systematic shifts in geographical ranges of species and increased extinction risk has emerged as one of the most pervasive biological responses to recent anthropogenic climate warming. The general trend shows range expansion towards higher latitudes; however, redistribution dynamics at southern range margins are less clear (for example, <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr></abbrgrp>). While on land, southern or 'trailing' range boundaries of terrestrial ectotherms may not shift consistently towards the poles with climate warming, marine species ranges match more closely their limits of thermal tolerance. Thus, range shifts will show a more predictable southern range contraction in the marine realm <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>Extinction of southern edge populations along the Iberian Peninsula has been reported for other marine cold temperate species <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr></abbrgrp>. Another study conducted along this stretch of coast highlights the complexity in making generalizations about range shifts for intertidal species <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B37">37</abbr></abbrgrp>. The extensive historical records reviewed in our study indicate that until the late 1980s abundant populations of <it>F. vesiculosus </it>were still present along the entire Moroccan and Iberian Atlantic coasts, while in the early 2000s extensive populations of this alga still persisted in southern Portugal. When these records are compared with our more recent surveys (2009 to 2011), a major contraction of the southern range margin of this keystone intertidal species (that is, from southern Morocco to central Portugal, latitudinal reduction of more than 1,200 km) is revealed. Taken together with past studies, there is a strong indication that the northward distributional shift along the Portuguese coast occurred very recently, probably within the last decade. This range contraction is an order of magnitude larger than the range shifts recorded for other species over the last 50 years along the Northeast Atlantic (for example, <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr><abbr bid="B37">37</abbr></abbrgrp>).</p>
<p>Trends in SST indicated that the large scale disappearance of southern populations of <it>F. vesiculosus </it>is correlated with warming of North African and southwest Iberian coastal waters, with steady year-round increases averaging &gt;0.2&#176;C/decade over the last three decades. Seasonal thermal extremes might also play a crucial role in defining the distribution of species through sudden population declines or die-offs <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr></abbrgrp>. However, the key pressure exerted by increasing average SST may result from sub-lethal rather than catastrophic effects. In the North-Eastern Atlantic, the distributional limits of most warm and cold-water algal species seem to be set by sub-lethal effects of water temperature, through reduced reproduction and growth, rather than by lethal effects <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr><abbr bid="B40">40</abbr></abbrgrp>. Several other factors indirectly related or unrelated to changes in temperature may be responsible for the observed distributional shifts. These include biotic interactions (for example, grazing and competition <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B41">41</abbr></abbrgrp>) and near-shore abiotic or anthropogenic effects (for example, pollution, coastal erosion, wave <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B38">38</abbr><abbr bid="B42">42</abbr></abbrgrp>). Moreover, seaweed survival, growth, and reproduction are known to be largely affected by latitudinal variations in nutrient supply <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B43">43</abbr><abbr bid="B44">44</abbr></abbrgrp>. However, mean or maximum water temperatures appear to be the best overall predictors of mortality events in the intertidal zone and the main determinants of large scale range contractions (for example, <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B36">36</abbr><abbr bid="B45">45</abbr><abbr bid="B46">46</abbr><abbr bid="B47">47</abbr></abbrgrp>) as opposed to maximum air temperatures. Intertidal organisms are essentially at the same temperature as water during high tide, while thermal conditions experienced during low tide are more likely to be affected by individual physiological <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B48">48</abbr><abbr bid="B49">49</abbr></abbrgrp> and behavioral <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B50">50</abbr></abbrgrp> capacities and by the heterogeneity of intertidal microhabitats <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B51">51</abbr><abbr bid="B52">52</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>The abundance of species is generally expected to peak at the center of their distributional range and decline with adverse conditions towards the range limits (for example, <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B53">53</abbr></abbrgrp>). However, several empirical studies have challenged the 'abundant center' view of species distribution <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B54">54</abbr></abbrgrp>, such as in the intertidal zone where localized variations in the thermal environment due to climatic and tidal interactions disrupt monotonic latitudinal temperature clines <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B54">54</abbr><abbr bid="B55">55</abbr><abbr bid="B56">56</abbr></abbrgrp>. In particular, delivery of cold waters by upwelling is not directly correlated with atmospheric processes, providing an opportunity for regional de-coupling of global warming and the creation of refugial areas where intertidal communities can escape the effects of projected climatic changes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B57">57</abbr><abbr bid="B58">58</abbr></abbrgrp>. Strong upwelling events off the northwest Iberian coastline reinforce latitudinal temperature gradients <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr></abbrgrp>, while local upwelling further south (for example, the Cape Ghir region in Morocco, 31&#176;N) disrupts latitudinal thermal clines. The latter constitutes one of the most persistent (year-round) upwelling cells along the northwest African coast <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B59">59</abbr></abbrgrp>. The SST data clearly indicate that the upwelling region around Cape Ghir has not experienced significant warming, in contrast to adjacent non-upwelling areas (but see below). As a result, and in contrast to the Portuguese coastline, this upwelling cell disrupts the regional thermal latitudinal cline. Despite suggestions that upwelling could provide refugia from the thermal stress of ocean warming <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B57">57</abbr><abbr bid="B58">58</abbr></abbrgrp>, our results show that <it>F. vesiculosus </it>populations affected by cold upwelled waters have also undergone extinction. In Cape Ghir, warming rates show variation at monthly timescales, with a significant SST increase of about 0.28&#176;C/decade in March (<url>http://coastalwarming.com</url> <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B60">60</abbr></abbrgrp>) and maximum SST peaking occasionally over 24&#176;C <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B61">61</abbr></abbrgrp>. Although monthly SST anomalies and high temperature events are less frequent and intense than in contiguous non-upwelling areas, they might be strong enough to cause extinction. Furthermore, effects of climate variability can be aggravated if isolation limits gene flow between populations, increasing genetic loss to drift with consequent loss of evolvability to cope with future environmental change <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>. While northern populations are well connected by continuous patches of <it>F. vesiculosus</it>, populations at the southern edge were fragmented and spatially isolated prior to extinction, potentially limiting population size and increasing susceptibility to drastic demographic and genetic variation.</p>
<p>Interestingly, patches of <it>F. vesiculosus </it>persist within the Bay of Cadiz, along the retreating front. This represents a restricted (extending less than 1 km along the coast) population confined to very sheltered areas within the bay (personal observation). The forecasted warming trend suggests that this small and isolated relict population faces a high risk of extinction, and this prediction is further supported by the extinction of nearby (less than 10 km distant) populations (for example, La Caleta and Playa de la Victoria).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><p>Range shifts in northern Iberia</p></st>
<p>Along eastern Atlantic shores, <it>F. vesiculosus </it>extends its northern distributional limit in Norway, also inhabiting the northernmost and brackish regions of the Baltic Sea and in the White Sea into brackish tidal marshlands. Within the range of <it>F. vesiculosus</it>, there is a well-documented gap along the SW French coast (French Basque Country and Gascony) due to lack of rocky substratum <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B62">62</abbr></abbrgrp>. In contrast to the southern clade, our results indicate that the present distributional range of the northern lineage in Iberia has been affected minimally, with a contraction of approximately 70 km at the southern limit of this gap (Spanish Basque Country). Notably, <it>F. vesiculosus </it>individuals from other regions in Europe are genetically closer to the northern Iberian clade identified in our study by the same markers <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B63">63</abbr></abbrgrp>. A graphical model based on IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B64">64</abbr></abbrgrp>) scenarios predicted the range decline observed in our study <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B65">65</abbr></abbrgrp>. This model extends its forecast until 2050 predicting that, by 2025, cold water species, including <it>F. vesiculosus</it>, will disappear completely from the Bay of Biscay.</p>
<p>In Northern Spain, recent distributional declines have also been reported for <it>Fucus serratus </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B66">66</abbr></abbrgrp>, <it>Himanthalia elongata </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B67">67</abbr></abbrgrp> and three kelp species <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B68">68</abbr></abbrgrp>, most probably caused by significant increases in SST <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B69">69</abbr></abbrgrp> and unusually intense warm inflow of seawater during autumn-winter in 2006 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B70">70</abbr></abbrgrp>. Interestingly, despite these warming trends, present SST at the eastern limit of <it>F. vesiculosus </it>in Northern Spain is lower than that at the southern limit in Portugal. This suggests that the two genetic lineages have different thermal tolerances or that distinct factors are setting their distribution limit. Indeed, different genetic lineages or populations inhabiting different areas within a species' distributional range can show diverse resistance or resilience to abiotic stresses (for example, <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B49">49</abbr><abbr bid="B71">71</abbr></abbrgrp>). For example, along Atlantic European shores, southern edge populations of <it>F. serratus </it>are less resilient to desiccation and heat shock than central populations <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B49">49</abbr></abbrgrp>. Future experimental approaches could allow explicit tests for signs of local adaptation between southern and northern lineages of <it>F. vesiculosus</it>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><p>Genetic diversity under threat</p></st>
<p>Reduction in genetic variation gives independent evidence of the severity of population and habitat contraction. Estimating losses in genetic diversity associated with habitat contraction and environmental change is one of the key challenges in biodiversity research. The intensity of genetic loss largely depends on the geographical distribution of genetic diversity within the species, including cryptic diversification. Our analyses revealed two clusters, coinciding with more northern and southern locations, distinguished by several analyses based on allele frequencies, and containing unique alleles within each group, in the five microsatellite loci here used. The differentiation between northern and southern lineages in <it>F. vesiculosus </it>was clearly established using a large number of distinct genetic markers including 13 protein coding genes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B72">72</abbr></abbrgrp> and 35 SNP markers <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B73">73</abbr></abbrgrp>. The separation between these lineages of <it>F. vesiculosus </it>is older than the divergence between other more recently evolved species within the genus <it>Fucus </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B71">71</abbr></abbrgrp>, highlighting their conservation value. The same multigene assays <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B70">70</abbr><abbr bid="B71">71</abbr></abbrgrp> could not be performed on the old DNA left from the extinct populations here studied, thus our genetic analyses of the extinct populations are only based on five microsatellites, yet these were sufficient to reveal unique alleles.</p>
<p>The divergence between northern and southern lineages does not appear to be absolute, since a few individuals appear to occur in mixed populations (STRUCTURE analysis; for example, RE, OV, RM). Additionally, individuals from RE, not only diverge from southern populations, but emerge as the most distinct within the northern clade (CA analysis) with no apparent geographical explanation. This appears geographically unexpected, but patterns of genetic structure and differentiation are not necessarily maintained by prominent ecological/oceanographic barriers to dispersal <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B74">74</abbr></abbrgrp>. For example, in <it>Fucus ceranoides</it>, distant (but relatively similar) populations do not necessarily exchange more migrants than closer (but relatively distinct) populations <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr></abbrgrp>; historical patterns of extinction and colonization may play a more important role than ongoing gene flow in determining the extent of genetic divergence between extant populations.</p>
<p>Presently, the distributional range of the southern clade is restricted within approximately two degrees of latitude (17% of the historical range) and southern intra-specific genetic diversity is represented by few extant populations under threat from climatic warming. Given that predictions of future climate indicate a further rise in SST <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B75">75</abbr></abbrgrp>, there is a real risk of extinction of the southern phylogeographic distinctiveness owing to climatic shifts. In contrast, for long-term conservation purposes, it is reasonable to assume that, despite the relatively small range decline, the diversity of the northern clade is not under immediate risk of reduction because populations of this same genetic group are still present throughout Northern Europe.</p>
<p>Past and present distributional ranges of the southern lineage are characterized by markedly higher SST than those of the northern lineage; it can be hypothesized that the existence of this lineage is explained by local adaptation or phenotypic plasticity to withstand warmer waters. Our multi-locus genetic data represent neutral genetic change and do not necessarily reflect evolutionary responses to selection. However, divergent lineages often arise in areas of speciation (for example, <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B76">76</abbr><abbr bid="B77">77</abbr></abbrgrp>). Indeed, recent data indicate that the hermaphroditic species <it>F. virsoides, F. spiralis </it>and the recently-described <it>F. guiryi </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B78">78</abbr></abbrgrp> are derived from a dioecious ancestor sister to the southern clade of <it>F. vesiculosus </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B72">72</abbr></abbrgrp>. The potential loss of the cryptic southern <it>F. vesiculosus </it>lineage could end ongoing diversification (or speciation) processes and compromise the adaptive potential of the species as a whole in the face of future global warming.</p>
<p>In this study, genetic diversity of <it>F. vesiculosus</it>, as expressed by both gene diversity and allelic richness, was higher in northern Iberian populations than in the southern lineage. Higher genetic diversity in the northern Iberian region can be a signature of higher temporal stability of large populations while the opposite, in the southern region, could be the result of lower population sizes and/or temporal variability (that is, bottlenecks, extinctions/recolonizations) of the trailing edge populations. Higher diversity could also result from secondary contact between distinct lineages and/or from hybridization and introgression. While <it>F. vesiculosus </it>co-occurs with other fucoids throughout the majority of its range, including Northern Iberia, Southern Iberian individuals occur in allopatry. Therefore, hybridization events are likely only within and to the north of the contact zone between the sympatric and allopatric ranges <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B63">63</abbr></abbrgrp>. Given the apparently small population sizes (small patches) of the populations of the southern group, which are, thus, prone to drift and bottlenecks, and their geographical isolation (separated by tens to hundreds of km), it is perhaps surprising that genetic diversity, although lower, still remains so close to northern levels. Regardless of the cause behind the current within-clade diversity, their genetic distinctiveness implies that the total diversity of <it>F. vesiculosus </it>would be significantly reduced should these last remaining populations also become extinct.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><st><p>Conclusions</p></st>
<p>A remarkable climate-induced species range reduction is driving a cryptic genetic clade (southern clade) to extinction. This clade occurs under stressful and selective environmental conditions and is, therefore, a potential pool of adaptive traits for the species; losing it could thus reduce the adaptive potential of the species, a serious conservation concern. However, the recent loss of most of the populations in this lineage suggests a more drastic scenario where their genetic distinctiveness has not been able to rescue them from extinction. Although low diversity within small marginal populations can reduce local adaptive capacity <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B47">47</abbr></abbrgrp>, here, even the southern clade hotspot of diversity (Rio Mira - RM) went extinct.</p>
<p>In addition to genetic erosion, the elimination of <it>F. vesiculosus </it>populations is likely to have other immediate ecological consequences. This is a dominant intertidal ecosystem engineer that influences coastal species richness by modifying habitats, increasing spatial complexity and facilitating the presence of other species <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B79">79</abbr><abbr bid="B80">80</abbr></abbrgrp>; thus, its large-scale disappearance may modify and decrease ecosystem complexity, reducing diversity and abundance of associated species (for example, Baltic Sea <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B81">81</abbr></abbrgrp>), with potential effects on all trophic levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><p>Methods</p></st>
<sec><st><p>Past and present distributions and endpoints</p></st>
<p>Data on the past distribution and southern endpoint of <it>F. vesiculosus </it>along Atlantic North African and Iberian coastlines were gathered from a comprehensive literature review and information from herbarium collections. Data for the last decade also included personal records and associated sample collections made by our team in multiple surveys of the Iberian and Moroccan coastline for genetic sampling of this species for previous studies <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B63">63</abbr><abbr bid="B72">72</abbr><abbr bid="B82">82</abbr><abbr bid="B83">83</abbr></abbrgrp> and of species that co-occur in the same habitats <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr><abbr bid="B84">84</abbr><abbr bid="B85">85</abbr></abbrgrp>. Published literature was screened up until May 2012 in searches using Google Scholar and ISI Web of Knowledge and based on combinations of the following keywords: <it>Fucus, vesiculosus</it>, Morocco, Iberia, Iberian Peninsula, Portugal, Spain, France, Atlantic, Western Sahara, distribution, herbarium, Fucales, Fucophyceae. In addition, literature reported in AlgaeBase (<url>http://www.algaebase.org</url>) was screened and searched up until 16 May 2012. Sampling artifacts may bias range shift studies <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B86">86</abbr></abbrgrp> because (a) the spatial and temporal scale of surveys are limited, and (b) taxonomical information and ecology of species are poorly known. We expect these limitations to have minimal effects on our data because (a) the entire stretch of coast examined in the present study has been the object of extensive research providing a fundamental dataset of the spatial and temporal extent of the species' geographic range; and (b) <it>F. vesiculosu</it>s is a scientifically popular species with well-known biology. It has the clear distinctive trait of possessing air bladders on the thallus, diagnostic for this species, and presents separate sexes, in contrast with the only other congeneric species occurring southwards from North Portugal. In addition, museum and literature records did not show any discrepancy. Therefore, we are confident about the quality of the points of reference used in this study.</p>
<p>Current distribution and endpoints were obtained based on an extensive field survey thoroughly covering the entire past distribution of <it>F. vesiculosus</it>. The survey was carried out during low spring tides between 2009 and 2011 on rocky intertidal shores along the Atlantic North African and Iberian coastlines. Eighty-four moderately wave exposed and estuarine locations were sampled from Hondarribia (Spain, 43&#176;21'N 1&#176;47'W) to Dakhla (Western Sahara, 23&#176;41'N 15&#176;55'W), covering a latitudinal extension of more than 2,150 km. Locations of the survey were chosen based on previous reports of the presence of <it>F. vesiculosus </it>(herbarium, DNA samples and literature data). Five additional locations were only surveyed in 2009 to 2011, of which two were in Western Sahara (Boujdour and Dakhla), south of the historical southern limit.</p>
<p>Most of the locations were visited at least twice, covering winter and summer months, and each location included two sites from 500 m to 1 km apart. At each site, two observers performed searches lasting approximately 60 minutes across all microhabitats present.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><p>Temperature trends</p></st>
<p>Monthly averaged SST data between January 2009 and December 2011 with a 4 km resolution were retrieved from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer-Aqua (MODIS-Aqua) dataset available from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Earth Sciences (GES) Data and Information Services Center (DISC). Visualization was performed using Giovanni, a web-based application developed by the GES DISC <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B61">61</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>Coastal SST warming data over the last three decades (&#176;C/decade from January 1982 to December 2011) were obtained from the Worldwide Coastal Warming Assessment project website at <url>http://www.coastalwarming.com/index.html</url> <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B60">60</abbr></abbrgrp>. This project uses Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR), NOAA Optimum Interpolation &#188; Degree Daily Sea Surface Temperature Analysis data (Reynolds OI V2 SST data) acquired from the NOAA-National Climatic Data Center (<url>http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov</url>).</p>
<p>Note that, although warming rates at coastal and ocean locations often depend on the selected spatial and temporal scales, our SST trends are comparable with those reported in other studies that focused on different periods and spatial resolutions <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr><abbr bid="B59">59</abbr><abbr bid="B87">87</abbr><abbr bid="B88">88</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><p>Genetic data</p></st>
<p>Previously sampled <it>F. vesiculosus </it>collected in 2001 and 2002 from 12 locations, including four extinct populations, were used for genetic analyses (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). DNA extraction used the DNeasy&#8482; Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and five polymorphic microsatellite loci, L20, L58, L38, L94, L78 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B89">89</abbr></abbrgrp> were amplified and genotyped following the methods described in Perrin <it>et al. </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B83">83</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><p>Data analyses</p></st>
<p>Observed (<it>H</it><sub>O</sub>) and expected (<it>H</it><sub>E</sub>) heterozygosities were estimated, and deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were tested for significance with 10,000 permutations, using GENETIX 4.05 software (Belkhir <it>et al. </it>1996-2004), applying q-value correction for multiple tests <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B90">90</abbr></abbrgrp>. Allelic richness (<it>&#194;</it>) was estimated for each population separately, standardized to 20 individuals to account for differences in sample size, using the StandArich package and R 2.10.1 software. Plot of allelic frequencies for each location and marker was performed with the above package.</p>
<p>To depict the global genetic variation among the samples, a CA based on the matrix of individual genotypes identified with five nuclear markers was performed using the factorial correspondence analysis (FCA) procedure on populations implemented in GENETIX 4.05 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B91">91</abbr></abbrgrp> and graphically visualized with IBM<sup>&#174; </sup>SPSS<sup>&#174; </sup>20 software.</p>
<p><it>F<sub>ST </sub></it>and confidence intervals were estimated between pairs of populations with the estimator <it>&#952; </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B92">92</abbr></abbrgrp>, and computed using the R package 'DiveRsity' <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B93">93</abbr></abbrgrp>. Additionally, pairwise population differentiation was calculated as estimates of Jost's D<sub>EST </sub><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B94">94</abbr></abbrgrp> using SPADE software <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B95">95</abbr></abbrgrp>. Significance was tested using 10,000 random permutations of the individuals between samples with a threshold adjusted using q-value correction for multiple comparisons.</p>
<p>The Cavalli-Sforza and Edwards' chord distance <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B96">96</abbr></abbrgrp> was computed (with GENDIST), as this measure has been shown to generate higher probabilities of obtaining the correct tree topology <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B97">97</abbr></abbrgrp>. Neighbor-joining was used to assemble the tree in NEIGHBOR with bootstrap re-sampling (10,000 replications) executed using SEQBOOT and CONSENSE. All programs are part of the software package PHYLIP 3.69 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B98">98</abbr></abbrgrp>. The output was visualized in FIGTREE 1.3.1. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B99">99</abbr></abbrgrp> and edited in Adobe<sup>&#174; </sup>Illustrator<sup>&#174; </sup>CS4 14.0.0 (Adobe System Inc.).</p>
<p>STRUCTURE 2.3.3. software <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B100">100</abbr></abbrgrp> was used to estimate the most probable number of population clusters (K). The analysis was run without prior information on populations, assuming correlated allele frequencies and admixture. The number of possible Ks assessed was 1 to 13 (maximum number of populations plus one) and 20 independent runs with 100,000 Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) iterations and 10,000 burn-in were performed at each K to calculate &#916;K as in Evanno <it>et al. </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B101">101</abbr></abbrgrp>. CLUMPP software <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B102">102</abbr></abbrgrp> was subsequently used to find the optimal alignment of the 20 replicate cluster analyses of the same K. The mean membership matrix across replicates was plotted with the program DISTRUCT <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B103">103</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>Finally, to compare the level of diversity within clusters, estimates of <it>&#194;, H<sub>O </sub></it>and <it>H<sub>E </sub></it>were calculated for the different clusters determined by STRUCTURE analyses by pooling all populations from each cluster.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><st><p>Abbreviations</p></st>
<p><it>&#194;</it>: allelic richness; CA: correspondence analyses; F<sub>IS</sub>: inbreeding coefficient; F<sub>ST</sub>: genetic differentiation; FCA: factorial correspondence analysis; H<sub>E</sub>: expected heterozygosity; H<sub>O</sub>: observed heterozygosity; K: population clusters; MODIS-Aqua: Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer-Aqua; SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism; SST: sea surface temperature.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><p>Competing interests</p></st>
<p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><p>Authors' contributions</p></st>
<p>GIZ, KRN, EAS and GAP conceived and designed the study. EAS and GAP provided distribution records and genetic data for extinct populations. GIZ and KRN gathered and analyzed temperature and distribution data. ST and KRN analyzed genetic data and all authors interpreted the data. KRN and GIZ wrote the article, which was critically revised by EAS and GAP. All authors read and approved the final version.</p>
</sec>
</bdy>
<bm>
<ack>
<sec><st><p>Acknowledgements</p></st>
<p>We thank C. Engel, C. Daguin and M. Valente for collecting samples in Portugal, F. Alberto and C. Perrin for collecting samples in Morocco, and C. Perrin, M. van de Vliet and M. Valente for the genotyping work. We thank R. Castilho for computing assistance and four referees that contributed toward improving the manuscript. This work was financed by FCT (Funda&#231;&#227;o para a Ci&#234;ncia e a Tecnologia), mainly through the projects PTDC/MAR/110251/2009 (to KRN), PTDC/AAC-CLI/109108/2008 (to EAS), and other projects (to EAS, GAP) in which some previous samples or data records had been collected. KRN was funded by FCT postdoctoral grant SFRH/BPD/45544/2008 and the collaborators described above were funded by FCT and the European Social Fund.</p>
</sec>
</ack>
<refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>Extinction risk from climate change</p></title><aug><au><snm>Thomas</snm><fnm>CD</fnm></au><au><snm>Cameron</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Green</snm><fnm>RE</fnm></au><au><snm>Bakkenes</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Beaumont</snm><fnm>LJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Collingham</snm><fnm>YC</fnm></au><au><snm>Erasmus</snm><fnm>BFN</fnm></au><au><snm>de Siqueira</snm><fnm>MF</fnm></au><au><snm>Grainger</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Hannah</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Hughes</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Huntley</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Van Jaarsveld</snm><fnm>AS</fnm></au><au><snm>Midgley</snm><fnm>GF</fnm></au><au><snm>Miles</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Ortega-Huerta</snm><fnm>MA</fnm></au><au><snm>Peterson</snm><fnm>AT</fnm></au><au><snm>Phillips</snm><fnm>OL</fnm></au><au><snm>Williams</snm><fnm>SE</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>427</volume><fpage>145</fpage><lpage>148</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nature02121</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14712274</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>Climate-induced range contraction drives genetic erosion in an alpine mammal</p></title><aug><au><snm>Rubidge</snm><fnm>EM</fnm></au><au><snm>Patton</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au><au><snm>Lim</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Burton</snm><fnm>AC</fnm></au><au><snm>Brashares</snm><fnm>JS</fnm></au><au><snm>Moritz</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Nat Climate Change</source><pubdate>2012</pubdate><volume>2</volume><fpage>285</fpage><lpage>288</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nclimate1415</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems</p></title><aug><au><snm>Parmesan</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Yohe</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>421</volume><fpage>37</fpage><lpage>42</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nature01286</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12511946</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>Thermal tolerance and the global redistribution of animals</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sunday</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Bates</snm><fnm>AE</fnm></au><au><snm>Dulvy</snm><fnm>NK</fnm></au></aug><source>Nat Climate Change</source><pubdate>2012</pubdate><volume>2</volume><fpage>686</fpage><lpage>690</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming</p></title><aug><au><snm>Chen</snm><fnm>I-C</fnm></au><au><snm>Hill</snm><fnm>JK</fnm></au><au><snm>Ohlem&#252;ller</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Roy</snm><fnm>DB</fnm></au><au><snm>Thomas</snm><fnm>CD</fnm></au></aug><source>Science</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>333</volume><fpage>1024</fpage><lpage>1026</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.1206432</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21852500</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>Ecological effects of climate fluctuations</p></title><aug><au><snm>Stenseth</snm><fnm>NC</fnm></au><au><snm>Mysterud</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Ottersen</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Hurrell</snm><fnm>JW</fnm></au><au><snm>Chan</snm><fnm>K-S</fnm></au><au><snm>Lima</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Science</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>297</volume><fpage>1292</fpage><lpage>1296</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.1071281</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12193777</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>Genetic consequences of climatic oscillations in the Quaternary</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hewitt</snm><fnm>GM</fnm></au></aug><source>Philos Trans R Soc London B Biol Sci</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>359</volume><fpage>183</fpage><lpage>195</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1098/rstb.2003.1388</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1693318</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15101575</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B8"><title><p>Genetic consequences of climate change for northern plants</p></title><aug><au><snm>Alsos</snm><fnm>IG</fnm></au><au><snm>Ehrich</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Thuiller</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Eidesen</snm><fnm>PB</fnm></au><au><snm>Tribsch</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Sch&#246;nswetter</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Lagaye</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Taberlet</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Brochmann</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Proc Biol Sci</source><pubdate>2012</pubdate><volume>279</volume><fpage>2042</fpage><lpage>2051</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1098/rspb.2011.2363</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">3311896</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">22217725</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B9"><title><p>Running to stand still: adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jump</snm><fnm>AS</fnm></au><au><snm>Pe&#241;uelas</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Ecol Lett</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>8</volume><fpage>1010</fpage><lpage>1020</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00796.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>Trans-Atlantic dispersal and large-scale lack of genetic structure in the circumpolar, arctic-alpine sedge <it>Carex bigelowii </it>s. l. (Cyperaceae)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sch&#246;nswetter</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Elven</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Brochmann</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Am J Bot</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>95</volume><fpage>1006</fpage><lpage>1014</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.3732/ajb.2007196</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21632421</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>Genetic consequences of Pleistocene range shifts: contrast between the Arctic, the Alps and the East African mountains</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ehrich</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Gaudeul</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Assefa</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Koch</snm><fnm>MA</fnm></au><au><snm>Mummenhoff</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Nemomissa</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><cnm>Intrabiodiversity Consortium</cnm></au><au><snm>Brochmann</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Ecol</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>2542</fpage><lpage>2559</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03299.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17561912</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hampe</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Petit</snm><fnm>RJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Ecol Lett</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>8</volume><fpage>461</fpage><lpage>467</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00739.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">21352449</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>Genetic variation across species' geographical ranges: the central-marginal hypothesis and beyond</p></title><aug><au><snm>Eckert</snm><fnm>CG</fnm></au><au><snm>Samis</snm><fnm>KE</fnm></au><au><snm>Lougheed</snm><fnm>SC</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Ecol</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>17</volume><fpage>1170</fpage><lpage>1188</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03659.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18302683</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>The 'Expansion-Contraction' model of Pleistocene biogeography: rocky shores suffer a sea change?</p></title><aug><au><snm>Marko</snm><fnm>PB</fnm></au><au><snm>Hoffman</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Emme</snm><fnm>SA</fnm></au><au><snm>McGovern</snm><fnm>TM</fnm></au><au><snm>Keever</snm><fnm>CC</fnm></au><au><snm>Nicole Cox</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Ecol</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>19</volume><fpage>146</fpage><lpage>169</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04417.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20092033</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>Phylogeographic insights into cryptic glacial refugia</p></title><aug><au><snm>Provan</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Bennett</snm><fnm>KD</fnm></au></aug><source>Trends Ecol Evol</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>23</volume><fpage>564</fpage><lpage>571</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.tree.2008.06.010</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18722689</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>Unique genetic variation at a species's rear edge is under threat from global climate change</p></title><aug><au><snm>Provan</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Maggs</snm><fnm>CA</fnm></au></aug><source>Proc Biol Sci</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>279</volume><fpage>39</fpage><lpage>47</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">3223643</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21593035</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B17"><title><p>Range-edge genetic diversity: locally poor extant southern patches maintain a regionally diverse hotspot in the seagrass <it>Zostera marina</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Diekmann</snm><fnm>OE</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>EA</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Ecol</source><pubdate>2012</pubdate><volume>21</volume><fpage>1647</fpage><lpage>1657</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05500.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">22369278</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B18"><title><p>Drifting fronds and drifting alleles: range dynamics, local dispersal and habitat isolation shape the population structure of the estuarine seaweed <it>Fucus ceranoides</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Neiva</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>GA</fnm></au><au><snm>Valero</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>EA</fnm></au></aug><source>J Biogeogr</source><pubdate>2012</pubdate><volume>39</volume><fpage>1167</fpage><lpage>1178</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02670.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B19"><title><p>Numerical taxonomy of taxa of the genus Fucus in the Iberian Peninsula</p></title><aug><au><snm>P&#233;rez-Ruzafa</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Gallardo</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>G&#243;mez-Cancio</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Hydrobiologia</source><pubdate>1993</pubdate><volume>260/261</volume><fpage>81</fpage><lpage>90</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/BF00049006</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B20"><title><p>Aportaci&#243;n al conocimiento de la flora bent&#243;nica marina de las costas de Huelva</p></title><aug><au><snm>Navarro</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Gallardo</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>Stud Bot</source><pubdate>1994</pubdate><volume>13</volume><fpage>51</fpage><lpage>60</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B21"><aug><au><snm>Lima</snm><fnm>FP</fnm></au></aug><source>Biogeography of Intertidal Species along the Portuguese Rocky Coast</source><publisher>Saarbr&#252;cken, Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing</publisher><pubdate>2010</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B22"><title><p>Intertidal rocky shore communities of the continental Portuguese coast: analysis of distribution patterns</p></title><aug><au><snm>Boaventura</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>R&#233;</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Cancela da Fonseca</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Hawkins</snm><fnm>SJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Marine Ecol</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>23</volume><fpage>69</fpage><lpage>90</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1439-0485.2002.02758.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B23"><title><p>Biogeographic patterns of intertidal macroinvertebrates and their association with macroalgae distribution along the Portuguese coast Marine Biodiversity</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pereira</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Lima</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Queiroz</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Ribeiro</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Santos</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Marine Biodiversity: Patterns and Processes, Assessment, Threats, Management and Conservation</source><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><editor>Martens K, Queiroga H, Cunha M, Cunha A, Moreira M, Quintino V, Rodrigues A, Sero&#244;dio J, Warwick R, Dumont HJ</editor><pubdate>2006</pubdate><fpage>185</fpage><lpage>192</lpage><note>[Dumont HJ (Series Editor): <it>Developments in Hydrobiology</it>, vol.183.]</note></bibl><bibl id="B24"><title><p>Sur des d&#233;placements de fronti&#232;res biog&#233;ographiques, observ&#233;s au long des c&#244;tes ib&#233;riques dans le domaine intercotidal</p></title><aug><au><snm>Fischer-Pi&#233;tte</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>Publicaciones del Instituto de Biolog&#237;a Aplicada</source><pubdate>1957</pubdate><volume>26</volume><fpage>35</fpage><lpage>40</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B25"><aug><au><snm>Ardr&#233;</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><source>Contribution &#224; l&apos;&#233;tude des algues marines du Portugal I. Portugaliae Acta Biologica (B)</source><pubdate>1970</pubdate><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">23349978</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B26"><aug><au><snm>Ardr&#233;</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><source>Contribution &#224; l&apos;&#233;tude des algues marines du Portugal II</source><publisher>Biarritz: Bulletin du Centre d&apos;Etudes et de Recherches Scientifiques</publisher><pubdate>1971</pubdate><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">23349978</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B27"><title><p>Inventaire bibliographique des algues benthiques du littoral marocain I, Chlorophyceae et Phaeophyceae</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kazzaz</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Riadi</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Inventaire bibliographique des algues benthiques du littoral marocain I, Chlorophyceae et Phaeophyceae</source><publisher>Universidad de M&#225;laga: Departamento de biolog&#237;a Vegetal</publisher><pubdate>1998</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B28"><title><p>Notas ficologicas acerca de la Costa Atl&#225;ntica-marroqu&#237;</p></title><aug><au><snm>Rodriguez</snm><fnm>GMC</fnm></au><au><snm>Hernandez</snm><fnm>SJS</fnm></au></aug><source>Vieraea</source><pubdate>1986</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>193</fpage><lpage>198</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B29"><title><p>Seagrasses in Portugal: a most endangered marine habitat</p></title><aug><au><snm>Cunha</snm><fnm>AH</fnm></au><au><snm>Assis</snm><fnm>JF</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>EA</fnm></au></aug><source>Aquat Bot</source><pubdate>2012</pubdate><volume>104</volume><fpage>193</fpage><lpage>203</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B30"><title><p>Findkelp, a GIS-based community participation project to assess Portuguese kelp conservation status</p></title><aug><au><snm>Assis</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Tavares</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Tavares</snm><fnm>JT</fnm></au><au><snm>Cunha</snm><fnm>AH</fnm></au><au><snm>Alberto</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>EA</fnm></au></aug><source>J Coast Res</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>56</volume><fpage>1469</fpage><lpage>1473</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B31"><title><p>Range shifts and species diversity in marine ecosystem engineers: patterns and predictions for European sedimentary habitats</p></title><aug><au><snm>Berke</snm><fnm>SK</fnm></au><au><snm>Mahon</snm><fnm>AR</fnm></au><au><snm>Lima</snm><fnm>FP</fnm></au><au><snm>Halanych</snm><fnm>KM</fnm></au><au><snm>Wethey</snm><fnm>DS</fnm></au><au><snm>Woodin</snm><fnm>SA</fnm></au></aug><source>Global Ecol Biogeogr</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>19</volume><fpage>223</fpage><lpage>232</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00509.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B32"><title><p>Recent changes in the distribution of a marine gastropod, <it>Patella rustica </it>Linnaeus, 1758, and their relationship to unusual climatic events</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lima</snm><fnm>FP</fnm></au><au><snm>Queiroz</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Ribeiro</snm><fnm>PA</fnm></au><au><snm>Hawkins</snm><fnm>SJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Santos</snm><fnm>AM</fnm></au></aug><source>J Biogeogr</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>33</volume><fpage>812</fpage><lpage>822</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01457.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B33"><title><p>First record of the brown mussel (<it>Perna perna</it>) from the European Atlantic coast</p></title><aug><au><snm>Louren&#231;o</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Nicastro</snm><fnm>KR</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>EA</fnm></au><au><snm>Zardi</snm><fnm>GI</fnm></au></aug><source>Mar Biodivers Rec</source><pubdate>2012</pubdate><volume>5</volume><fpage>e39</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B34"><title><p>Expected effects of changing seawater temperatures on the geographic distribution of seaweed species</p></title><aug><au><snm>Breeman</snm><fnm>AM</fnm></au></aug><source>Expected effects of climate change on marine coastal ecosystems</source><publisher>The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><editor>Beukema JJ, Wolff WJ, Brouns M</editor><pubdate>1990</pubdate><fpage>69</fpage><lpage>76</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B35"><title><p>Biogeography, competition, and microclimate: the barnacle <it>Chthamalus fragilis </it>in New England</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wethey</snm><fnm>DS</fnm></au></aug><source>Integr Comp Biol</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>42</volume><fpage>872</fpage><lpage>880</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/icb/42.4.872</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21708786</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B36"><title><p>Climate change and historical biogeography of the barnacle <it>Semibalanus balanoides</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Jones</snm><fnm>SJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Southward</snm><fnm>AJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Wethey</snm><fnm>DS</fnm></au></aug><source>Glob Ecol Biogeogr</source><pubdate>2012</pubdate><volume>21</volume><fpage>716</fpage><lpage>724</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00721.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B37"><title><p>Do distributional shifts of northern and southern species of algae match the warming pattern?</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lima</snm><fnm>FP</fnm></au><au><snm>Ribeiro</snm><fnm>PA</fnm></au><au><snm>Queiroz</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Hawkins</snm><fnm>SJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Santos</snm><fnm>AM</fnm></au></aug><source>Glob Change Biol</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>13</volume><fpage>2592</fpage><lpage>2604</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01451.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B38"><title><p>Habitat distribution models for intertidal seaweeds: responses to climatic and non-climatic drivers</p></title><aug><au><snm>Mart&#237;nez</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Viejo</snm><fnm>RM</fnm></au><au><snm>Carre&#241;o</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Aranda</snm><fnm>SC</fnm></au></aug><source>J Biogeogr</source><pubdate>2012</pubdate><volume>39</volume><fpage>1877</fpage><lpage>1890</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02741.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B39"><title><p>Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts</p></title><aug><au><snm>Easterling</snm><fnm>DR</fnm></au><au><snm>Meehl</snm><fnm>GA</fnm></au><au><snm>Parmesan</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Changnon</snm><fnm>SA</fnm></au><au><snm>Karl</snm><fnm>TR</fnm></au><au><snm>Mearns</snm><fnm>LO</fnm></au></aug><source>Science</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>289</volume><fpage>2068</fpage><lpage>2074</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.289.5487.2068</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11000103</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B40"><title><p>Phytogeographic distribution groups of benthic marine algae in the North Atlantic Ocean. A review of experimental evidence from life history studies</p></title><aug><au><snm>van den Hoek</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Helgoland Mar Res</source><pubdate>1982</pubdate><volume>35</volume><fpage>153</fpage><lpage>214</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B41"><title><p>Ecological responses to recent climate change</p></title><aug><au><snm>Walther</snm><fnm>G-R</fnm></au><au><snm>Post</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Convey</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Menzel</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Parmesan</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Beebee</snm><fnm>TJC</fnm></au><au><snm>Fromentin</snm><fnm>J-M</fnm></au><au><snm>Hoegh-Guldberg</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Bairlein</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>416</volume><fpage>389</fpage><lpage>395</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/416389a</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11919621</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B42"><title><p>Climate change science: adapt, mitigate, or ignore?</p></title><aug><au><snm>King</snm><fnm>DA</fnm></au></aug><source>Science</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>303</volume><fpage>176</fpage><lpage>177</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.1094329</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14715997</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B43"><title><p>Geographic variation of southeastern Pacific intertidal communities</p></title><aug><au><snm>Broitman</snm><fnm>BR</fnm></au><au><snm>Navarrete</snm><fnm>SA</fnm></au><au><snm>Smith</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Gaines</snm><fnm>SD</fnm></au></aug><source>Mar Ecol Prog Ser</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>224</volume><fpage>21</fpage><lpage>24</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B44"><title><p>Assessment of macroalgal nitrogen limitation in a seasonal upwelling region</p></title><aug><au><snm>Fujita</snm><fnm>RM</fnm></au><au><snm>Wheeler</snm><fnm>PA</fnm></au><au><snm>Edwards</snm><fnm>RL</fnm></au></aug><source>Mar Ecol Prog Ser</source><pubdate>1989</pubdate><volume>3</volume><fpage>293</fpage><lpage>303</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B45"><title><p>Shifts in southern endpoints of distribution in rocky intertidal species along the south-eastern Pacific coast</p></title><aug><au><snm>Rivadeneira</snm><fnm>MM</fnm></au><au><snm>Fern&#225;ndez</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>J Biogeogr</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>32</volume><fpage>203</fpage><lpage>209</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01133.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B46"><title><p>Rising environmental temperatures and biogeography: poleward range contraction of the blue mussel, <it>Mytilus edulis </it>L., in the western Atlantic</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jones</snm><fnm>SJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Lima</snm><fnm>FP</fnm></au><au><snm>Wethey</snm><fnm>DS</fnm></au></aug><source>J Biogeogr</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>37</volume><fpage>2243</fpage><lpage>2259</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02386.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B47"><title><p>Biogeographical patterns of rocky intertidal communities along the Pacific coast of North America</p></title><aug><au><snm>Blanchette</snm><fnm>CA</fnm></au><au><snm>Melissa Miner</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Raimondi</snm><fnm>PT</fnm></au><au><snm>Lohse</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Heady</snm><fnm>KEK</fnm></au><au><snm>Broitman</snm><fnm>BR</fnm></au></aug><source>J Biogeogr</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>35</volume><fpage>1593</fpage><lpage>1607</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01913.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B48"><title><p>Physiological mechanisms in coping with climate change</p></title><aug><au><snm>Fuller</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Dawson</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Helmuth</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Hetem</snm><fnm>RS</fnm></au><au><snm>Mitchell</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Maloney</snm><fnm>SK</fnm></au></aug><source>Physiol Biochem Zool</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>83</volume><fpage>713</fpage><lpage>720</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1086/652242</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20578846</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B49"><title><p>Frayed at the edges: selective pressure and adaptive response to abiotic stressors are mismatched in low diversity edge populations</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>GA</fnm></au><au><snm>Lago-Leston</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Mota</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>J Ecol</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>97</volume><fpage>450</fpage><lpage>462</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01481.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B50"><title><p>The role of gaping behaviour in habitat partitioning between coexisting intertidal mussels</p></title><aug><au><snm>Nicastro</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Zardi</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>McQuaid</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Stephens</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Radloff</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Blatch</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>BMC Ecol</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>10</volume><fpage>17</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1472-6785-10-17</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2912236</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20624310</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B51"><title><p>Living on the edge of two changing worlds: forecasting the responses of rocky intertidal ecosystems to climate change</p></title><aug><au><snm>Helmuth</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Mieszkowska</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Moore</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Hawkins</snm><fnm>SJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>37</volume><fpage>373</fpage><lpage>404</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110149</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B52"><title><p>Side matters: microhabitat influence on intertidal heat stress over a large geographical scale</p></title><aug><au><snm>Seabra</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Wethey</snm><fnm>DS</fnm></au><au><snm>Santos</snm><fnm>AM</fnm></au><au><snm>Lima</snm><fnm>FP</fnm></au></aug><source>J Exp Mar Biol Ecol</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>400</volume><fpage>200</fpage><lpage>208</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.jembe.2011.02.010</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B53"><title><p>The distribution of abundance. I. Measurements</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hengeveld</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Haeck</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>J Biogeogr</source><pubdate>1982</pubdate><volume>9</volume><fpage>303</fpage><lpage>316</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.2307/2844717</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B54"><title><p>The 'abundant centre' distribution: to what extent is it a biogeographical rule?</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sagarin</snm><fnm>RD</fnm></au><au><snm>Gaines</snm><fnm>SD</fnm></au></aug><source>Ecol Lett</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>5</volume><fpage>137</fpage><lpage>147</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00297.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B55"><title><p>Moving beyond assumptions to understand abundance distributions across the ranges of species</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sagarin</snm><fnm>RD</fnm></au><au><snm>Gaines</snm><fnm>SD</fnm></au><au><snm>Gaylord</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au></aug><source>Trends Ecol Evol</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>21</volume><fpage>524</fpage><lpage>530</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.tree.2006.06.008</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16815588</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B56"><title><p>Geographical abundance distributions of coastal invertebrates: using one-dimensional ranges to test biogeographic hypotheses</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sagarin</snm><fnm>RD</fnm></au><au><snm>Gaines</snm><fnm>SD</fnm></au></aug><source>J Biogeogr</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>29</volume><fpage>985</fpage><lpage>997</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00705.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B57"><title><p>Possible refugia for reefs in times of environmental stress</p></title><aug><au><snm>Riegl</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Piller</snm><fnm>WE</fnm></au></aug><source>Int J Earth Sci</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>92</volume><fpage>520</fpage><lpage>531</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00531-003-0328-9</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B58"><title><p>Escaping the heat: range shifts of reef coral taxa in coastal Western Australia</p></title><aug><au><snm>Greenstein</snm><fnm>BJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Pandolfi</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au></aug><source>Glob Change Biol</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>14</volume><fpage>513</fpage><lpage>528</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01506.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B59"><title><p>Rapid 20th-century increase in coastal upwelling off northwest Africa</p></title><aug><au><snm>McGregor</snm><fnm>HV</fnm></au><au><snm>Dima</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Fischer</snm><fnm>HW</fnm></au><au><snm>Mulitza</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Science</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>315</volume><fpage>637</fpage><lpage>639</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.1134839</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17272719</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B60"><title><p>Three decades of high-resolution coastal sea surface temperatures reveal more than warming</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lima</snm><fnm>FP</fnm></au><au><snm>Wethey</snm><fnm>DS</fnm></au></aug><source>Nat Commun</source><pubdate>2012</pubdate><volume>3</volume><fpage>704</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">22426225</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B61"><title><p>Online analysis enhances use of NASA earth science data</p></title><aug><au><snm>Acker</snm><fnm>JG</fnm></au><au><snm>Leptoukh</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>Eos</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>88</volume><fpage>14</fpage><lpage>17</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1029/2007EO020003</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B62"><aug><au><snm>L&#252;ning</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Seaweeds. Their environment, biogeography, and ecophysiology</source><publisher>New York: Wiley Interscience</publisher><pubdate>1990</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B63"><title><p>Traveling in time with networks: revealing present day hybridization versus ancestral polymorphism between two species of brown algae, <it>Fucus vesiculosus </it>and <it>F. spiralis</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Moalic</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Arnaud-Haond</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Perrin</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Serrao</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>BMC Evol Biol</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>11</volume><fpage>33</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2148-11-33</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">3040711</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21281515</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B64"><aug><au><cnm>IPCC</cnm></au></aug><source>Climate change</source><publisher>The Scientific Basis, Cambridge University Press</publisher><pubdate>2001</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B65"><title><p>The effects of climate change on rocky shore communities in the Bay of Biscay, 1895-2050</p></title><aug><au><snm>Alcok</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Ph.D. Thesis</source><publisher>University of Southampton, UK</publisher><pubdate>2003</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B66"><title><p>Reproductive patterns in central and marginal populations of a large brown seaweed: drastic changes at the southern range limit</p></title><aug><au><snm>Viejo</snm><fnm>RM</fnm></au><au><snm>Mart&#237;nez</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Arrontes</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Astudillo</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Hern&#225;ndez</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au></aug><source>Ecography</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>34</volume><fpage>75</fpage><lpage>84</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B67"><title><p>La cornisa cantabrica: un escenario de cambios de distribuci&#243;n de comunidades intermareales</p></title><aug><au><snm>Fernandez</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Anadon</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Algas</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>39</volume><fpage>30</fpage><lpage>32</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B68"><title><p>The retreat of large brown seaweeds on the north coast of Spain: the case of <it>Saccorhiza polyschides</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Fern&#225;ndez</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Eur J Phycol</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>46</volume><fpage>352</fpage><lpage>360</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/09670262.2011.617840</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B69"><title><p>Coastal sea surface temperature warming trend along the continental part of the Atlantic Arc (1985-2005)</p></title><aug><au><snm>G&#243;mez-Gesteira</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>deCastro</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Alvarez</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>G&#243;mez-Gesteira</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au></aug><source>J Geophys Res</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>113</volume><fpage>C04010</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B70"><title><p>Intense warm and saline upper ocean inflow in the southern Bay of Biscay in autumn-winter 2006-2007</p></title><aug><au><snm>Le Cann</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Serpette</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Cont Shelf Res</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>29</volume><fpage>1014</fpage><lpage>1025</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.csr.2008.11.015</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B71"><title><p>The combination of selection and dispersal helps explain genetic structure in intertidal mussels</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zardi</snm><fnm>GI</fnm></au><au><snm>Nicastro</snm><fnm>KR</fnm></au><au><snm>McQuaid</snm><fnm>CD</fnm></au><au><snm>Hancke</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Helmuth</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au></aug><source>Oecologia</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>165</volume><fpage>947</fpage><lpage>958</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00442-010-1788-9</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20878422</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B72"><title><p>Driving south: a multi-gene phylogeny of the brown algal family Fucaceae reveals relationships and recent drivers of a marine radiation</p></title><aug><au><snm>Canovas</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Mota</snm><fnm>CF</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>EA</fnm></au><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>GA</fnm></au></aug><source>BMC Evol Biol</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>11</volume><fpage>371</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2148-11-371</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">3292578</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">22188734</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B73"><title><p>Development and characterization of 35 single nucleotide polymorphism markers for the brown alga <it>Fucus vesiculosus</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Canovas</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Mota</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Ferreira-Costa</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Coyer</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Olsen</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>Eur J Phycol</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>46</volume><fpage>342</fpage><lpage>351</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/09670262.2011.617473</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B74"><title><p>Geographical patterns of genetic structure in marine species with contrasting life histories</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pelc</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au><au><snm>Warner</snm><fnm>RR</fnm></au><au><snm>Gaines</snm><fnm>SD</fnm></au></aug><source>J Biogeogr</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>36</volume><fpage>1881</fpage><lpage>1890</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02138.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B75"><title><p>Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II, and III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change</p></title><aug><au><cnm>IPCC</cnm></au></aug><publisher>Geneva, Switzerland</publisher><pubdate>2007</pubdate><fpage>104</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B76"><title><p>Oceanic dispersal barriers, adaptation and larval retention: an interdisciplinary assessment of potential factors maintaining a phylogeographic break between sister lineages of an African prawn</p></title><aug><au><snm>Teske</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Papadopoulos</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Newman</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Dworschak</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>McQuaid</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Barker</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au></aug><source>BMC Evol Biol</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>8</volume><fpage>341</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2148-8-341</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2628387</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19108720</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B77"><title><p>The geography of speciation in narrow-range endemics of the 'Haenydra' lineage (Coleoptera, Hydraenidae, Hydraena)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ribera</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Castro</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>D&#237;az</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au><au><snm>Garrido</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Izquierdo</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>J&#228;ch</snm><fnm>MA</fnm></au><au><snm>Valladares</snm><fnm>LF</fnm></au></aug><source>J Biogeogr</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>38</volume><fpage>502</fpage><lpage>516</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02417.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B78"><title><p>Adaptive traits are maintained on steep selective gradients despite gene flow and hybridization in the intertidal zone</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zardi</snm><fnm>GI</fnm></au><au><snm>Nicastro</snm><fnm>KR</fnm></au><au><snm>Canovas</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Ferreira Costa</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>EA</fnm></au><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>GA</fnm></au></aug><source>PLoS ONE</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>6</volume><fpage>e19402</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0019402</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">3114782</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21695117</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B79"><title><p>Community organization in marine algal epifaunas</p></title><aug><au><snm>Seed</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>O&apos;Connor</snm><fnm>RJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Annu Rev Ecol Syst</source><pubdate>1981</pubdate><volume>12</volume><fpage>49</fpage><lpage>74</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1146/annurev.es.12.110181.000405</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B80"><title><p>Associational plant defenses and the maintenance of species diversity: turning competitors into accomplices</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hay</snm><fnm>ME</fnm></au></aug><source>Am Nat</source><pubdate>1986</pubdate><volume>128</volume><fpage>617</fpage><lpage>641</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1086/284593</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B81"><title><p>Structure and diversity of invertebrate communities in the presence and absence of canopy-forming <it>Fucus vesiculosus </it>in the Baltic Sea</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wikstr&#246;m</snm><fnm>SA</fnm></au><au><snm>Kautsky</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au></aug><source>Estuar Coast Shelf Sci</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>72</volume><fpage>168</fpage><lpage>176</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.ecss.2006.10.009</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B82"><title><p>Evolution and diversification within the intertidal brown macroalgae <it>Fucus spiralis/F. vesiculosus </it>species complex in the North Atlantic</p></title><aug><au><snm>Coyer</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au><au><snm>Hoarau</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Costa</snm><fnm>JF</fnm></au><au><snm>Hogerdijk</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>EA</fnm></au><au><snm>Billard</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Valero</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>GA</fnm></au><au><snm>Olsen</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Phylogenet Evol</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><issue>58</issue><fpage>283</fpage><lpage>296</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B83"><title><p>Implications of mating system for genetic diversity of sister algal species: <it>Fucus spiralis </it>and <it>Fucus vesiculosus </it>(Heterokontophyta, Phaeophyceae)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Perrin</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Daguin</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Vliet</snm><fnm>MVD</fnm></au><au><snm>Engel</snm><fnm>CR</fnm></au><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>GA</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>EA</fnm></au></aug><source>Eur J Phycol</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>42</volume><fpage>219</fpage><lpage>230</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/09670260701336554</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B84"><title><p>Population genetics of <it>Zostera noltii </it>along the west Iberian coast: consequences of small population size, habitat discontinuity and near-shore currents</p></title><aug><au><snm>Diekmann</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Coyer</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au><au><snm>Ferreira</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Olsen</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au><au><snm>Wytze</snm><fnm>TS</fnm></au><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>GA</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>EA</fnm></au></aug><source>Mar Ecol Prog Ser</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>290</volume><fpage>89</fpage><lpage>96</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B85"><title><p>The possible origin of <it>Zostera noltii </it>in the Canary Islands and guidelines for restoration</p></title><aug><au><snm>Diekmann</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Gouveia</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Perez</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Gil-Rodriguez</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>Mar Biol</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>157</volume><fpage>2109</fpage><lpage>2115</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00227-010-1467-8</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B86"><title><p>New range records of 12 marine invertebrates: the role of El Nino and other mechanisms in Southern and Central California</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lonhart</snm><fnm>SI</fnm></au><au><snm>Tupen</snm><fnm>JW</fnm></au></aug><source>Bull South Cal Acad Sci</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>100</volume><fpage>238</fpage><lpage>248</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B87"><title><p>Spatio-temporal upwelling trends along the Canary upwelling system (1967-2006)</p></title><aug><au><snm>G&#243;mez-Gesteira</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>De Castro</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>&#193;lvarez</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Lorenzo</snm><fnm>MN</fnm></au><au><snm>Gesteira</snm><fnm>JLG</fnm></au><au><snm>Crespo</snm><fnm>AJC</fnm></au></aug><source>Ann NY Acad Sci</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>1146</volume><fpage>320</fpage><lpage>337</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1196/annals.1446.004</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19076422</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B88"><title><p>Importance of the mesoscale in the decadal changes observed in the northern Canary upwelling system</p></title><aug><au><snm>Relvas</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Lu&#237;s</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Santos</snm><fnm>AMP</fnm></au></aug><source>Geophys Res Lett</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>36</volume><fpage>L22601</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B89"><title><p>Isolation and cross-species amplification of microsatellite loci from the fucoid seaweeds <it>Fucus vesiculosus, F. serratus </it>and <it>Ascophyllum nodosum </it>(Heterokontophyta, Fucaceae)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Engel</snm><fnm>CR</fnm></au><au><snm>Brawley</snm><fnm>SH</fnm></au><au><snm>Edwards</snm><fnm>KJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>EA</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Ecol Notes</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>3</volume><fpage>180</fpage><lpage>182</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00390.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B90"><title><p>A direct approach to false discovery rates</p></title><aug><au><snm>Storey</snm><fnm>JD</fnm></au></aug><source>J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>64</volume><fpage>479</fpage><lpage>498</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/1467-9868.00346</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B91"><title><p>GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la g&#233;n&#233;tique des populations</p></title><aug><au><snm>Belkhir</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Borsa</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Chikhi</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Raufaste</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Bonhomme</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><publisher>Laboratoire G&#233;nome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Universit&#233; de Montpellier II, Montpellier, France</publisher><pubdate>1996</pubdate><note>2004</note></bibl><bibl id="B92"><title><p>Estimation of gene flow from F-statistics</p></title><aug><au><snm>Weir</snm><fnm>BS</fnm></au><au><snm>Cockerham</snm><fnm>CC</fnm></au></aug><source>Evolution</source><pubdate>1984</pubdate><volume>47</volume><fpage>855</fpage><lpage>863</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B93"><title><p>Genetic diversity partition statistics and informative locus selection using Fst, Gst, Dest(Jost Chao) G'st and In</p></title><aug><au><snm>Keenan</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><pubdate>2013</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B94"><title><p>GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jost</snm><fnm>LOU</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Ecol</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>17</volume><fpage>4015</fpage><lpage>4026</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03887.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19238703</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B95"><title><p>SPADE (Species Prediction and Diversity Estimation)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Chao</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Shen</snm><fnm>T-J</fnm></au></aug><source>SPADE (Species Prediction and Diversity Estimation)</source><publisher>National Chung Hsing University</publisher><pubdate>2010</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B96"><title><p>Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures</p></title><aug><au><snm>Cavalli-Sforza</snm><fnm>LL</fnm></au><au><snm>Edwards</snm><fnm>AWF</fnm></au></aug><source>Evolution</source><pubdate>1967</pubdate><volume>21</volume><fpage>550</fpage><lpage>570</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.2307/2406616</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B97"><title><p>Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA</p></title><aug><au><snm>Takezaki</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Nei</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>144</volume><fpage>389</fpage><lpage>399</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">1207511</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8878702</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B98"><title><p>PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.69</p></title><aug><au><snm>Felsenstein</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><cnm>Ed</cnm></au></aug><publisher>Seattle: Distributed by the author. Department of Genetics. University of Washington</publisher><pubdate>1993</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B99"><title><p>FigTree</p></title><aug><au><snm>Rambaut</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><publisher>Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh</publisher><edition>1.3.1</edition><pubdate>2009</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B100"><title><p>Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pritchard</snm><fnm>JK</fnm></au><au><snm>Stephens</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Donnelly</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>Genetics</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>155</volume><fpage>945</fpage><lpage>959</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">1461096</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10835412</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B101"><title><p>Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study</p></title><aug><au><snm>Evanno</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Regnaut</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Goudet</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Ecol</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>14</volume><fpage>2611</fpage><lpage>2620</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15969739</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B102"><title><p>CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jakobsson</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Rosenberg</snm><fnm>NA</fnm></au></aug><source>Bioinformatics</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>23</volume><fpage>1801</fpage><lpage>1806</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btm233</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17485429</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B103"><title><p>Distruct: a program for the graphical display of population structure</p></title><aug><au><snm>Rosenberg</snm><fnm>NA</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Ecol Notes</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>4</volume><fpage>137</fpage><lpage>138</lpage></bibl></refgrp>
</bm>
</art>