<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art><ui>1471-2148-11-371</ui><ji>1471-2148</ji><fm>
<dochead>Research article</dochead>
<bibl>
<title>
<p>Driving south: a multi-gene phylogeny of the brown algal family Fucaceae reveals relationships and recent drivers of a marine radiation</p>
</title>
<aug>
<au id="A1" ca="yes"><snm>C&#225;novas</snm><mi>G</mi><fnm>Fernando</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>fcgarcia@ualg.pt</email></au>
<au id="A2"><snm>Mota</snm><mi>F</mi><fnm>Catarina</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>cfmota@ualg.pt</email></au>
<au id="A3"><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><mi>A</mi><fnm>Ester</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>eserrao@ualg.pt</email></au>
<au id="A4"><snm>Pearson</snm><mi>A</mi><fnm>Gareth</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>gpearson@ualg.pt</email></au>
</aug>
<insg>
<ins id="I1"><p>CCMAR, CIMAR-Laborat&#243;rio Associado, Universidade do Algarve, Gambelas 8005-139, Faro, Portugal</p></ins>
</insg>
<source>BMC Evolutionary Biology</source>
<issn>1471-2148</issn>
<pubdate>2011</pubdate>
<volume>11</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>371</fpage>
<url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/371</url>
<xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2148-11-371</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">22188734</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib>
</bibl>
<history><rec><date><day>7</day><month>9</month><year>2011</year></date></rec><acc><date><day>21</day><month>12</month><year>2011</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>21</day><month>12</month><year>2011</year></date></pub></history>
<cpyrt><year>2011</year><collab>C&#225;novas et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab><note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
<abs>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Abstract</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Background</p>
</st>
<p>Understanding the processes driving speciation in marine ecosystems remained a challenge until recently, due to the unclear nature of dispersal boundaries. However, recent evidence for marine adaptive radiations and ecological speciation, as well as previously undetected patterns of cryptic speciation is overturning this view. Here, we use multi-gene phylogenetics to infer the family-level evolutionary history of Fucaceae (intertidal brown algae of the northern Pacific and Atlantic) in order to investigate recent and unique patterns of radiative speciation in the genus <it>Fucus </it>in the Atlantic, in contrast with the mainly monospecific extant genera.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Results</p>
</st>
<p>We developed a set of markers from 13 protein coding genes based on polymorphic cDNA from EST libraries, which provided novel resolution allowing estimation of ancestral character states and a detailed reconstruction of the recent radiative history. Phylogenetic reconstructions yielded similar topologies and revealed four independent trans-Arctic colonization events by Fucaceae lineages, two of which also involved transitions from hermaphroditism to dioecy associated with Atlantic invasions. More recently, reversion of dioecious ancestral lineages towards hermaphroditism has occurred in the genus <it>Fucus</it>, particularly coinciding with colonization of more extreme habitats. Novel lineages in the genus <it>Fucus </it>were also revealed in association with southern habitats. These most recent speciation events occurred during the Pleistocene glaciations and coincided with a shift towards selfing mating systems, generally southward shifts in distribution, and invasion of novel habitats.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Conclusions</p>
</st>
<p>Diversification of the family occurred in the Late-Mid Miocene, with at least four independent trans-Artic lineage crossings coincident with two reproductive mode transitions. The genus <it>Fucus </it>arose in the Pliocene but radiated within a relatively short time frame about 2.5 million years ago. Current species distributions of <it>Fucus </it>suggest that climatic factors promoted differentiation between the two major clades, while the recent and rapid species radiation in the temperate clade during Pleistocene glacial cycles coincided with several potential speciation drivers.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</abs>
</fm><bdy>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Background</p>
</st>
<p>Most of the world's biodiversity occurs in the oceans, but understanding the processes that drive speciation in marine ecosystems remains a challenge particularly due to the perceived scarcity of geographical barriers to gene flow <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Although much marine diversity stems from climate-driven vicariant and colonization events <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, the accumulation of phylogenetic information is revealing that a considerable amount of diversity arises during adaptive radiations <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, these periods of rapid speciation associated with diversification into multiple ecological niches (e.g., <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
</abbrgrp>), have also been shown to occur in marine systems where barriers to dispersal are not obvious <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>Ecotypic divergence in response to strong environmental gradients or novel habitats (e.g., <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
</abbrgrp>) is a form of ecology-driven divergent selection that can cause population substructuring and differentiation <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Reproductive isolation occurs later, favouring assortative mating and facilitating speciation <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Mating system and reproductive ecology can also play an important role in marine speciation (e.g., <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>
</abbrgrp>), although they remain under-studied in this environment. A major question is whether the evolution of hermaphroditic selfing entities from outcrossing lineages is a major trend in the sea, in common with terrestrial plant mating system evolution <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The evolutionary shift toward selfing increases colonization potential and reproductive assurance, while also serving to maintain local adaptations in stressful environments at the cost of genetic diversity and evolvability <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>Geographical events driving speciation by vicariance or colonization have raised most interest in marine systems, and one of the most significant in the northern hemisphere was the opening of the Bering Strait. The formation of a marine connection between the North Pacific and the Arctic and North Atlantic Oceans <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
</abbrgrp> allowed trans-oceanic dispersal and divergence between Pacific and Atlantic sister taxa (e.g., <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
</abbrgrp>). Although the Pliocene opening of the Bering Strait has been placed at ca. 5.5 - 5.4 Ma <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, geomorphological and biological data <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
</abbrgrp> indicated that earlier openings possibly occurred in the Late Miocene. After the Pliocene opening, current patterns initially favoured Atlantic to Pacific exchanges <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
</abbrgrp> until ca. 3.5 Ma, after the closure of the Isthmus of Panama. The period of global cooling leading to the quaternary ice ages (starting ca. 1.8 Ma) began a series of oscillations in sea level and Arctic Ocean ice coverage, during which the Bering Strait closed and reopened at least six times <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Warmer periods coincided with higher trans-Arctic water flow, favouring inter-ocean dispersal events <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>The brown algal family Fucaceae constitutes an important ecosystem-structuring component of cold to temperate intertidal communities in the North Pacific and North Atlantic Oceans. The wide northern hemisphere distribution of Fucaceae contrasts with their Australasian endemic sister families. This is thought to result from a trans-equatorial crossing with subsequent radiation in the northern hemisphere, a pattern paralleled in other families <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Ancestors of the Atlantic Fucaceae genera <it>Ascophyllum, Pelvetia </it>and <it>Fucus</it>, are hypothesized to have invaded the Atlantic through the Arctic during the last opening of the Bering Strait <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. <it>Fucus </it>is the only Fucaceae genus that radiated extensively in the North Atlantic <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The cause of this process remains a challenging question that is only beginning to be understood <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Most extant genera within Fucaceae are, in strong contrast with <it>Fucus</it>, species-poor or monospecific. This allowed us to investigate which processes and events are associated with marine species radiations.</p>
<p>Speciation in <it>Fucus </it>may be associated with habitat-specificity (e.g., <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
</abbrgrp>) and variation in mating system and reproductive mode (e.g. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B28">28</abbr>
<abbr bid="B29">29</abbr>
<abbr bid="B30">30</abbr>
<abbr bid="B31">31</abbr>
</abbrgrp>), with a biogeographic history shaped by glacial cycle-induced range shifts and secondary contact <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
<abbr bid="B35">35</abbr>
<abbr bid="B36">36</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Although the phylogenetic history of the genus has never been fully reconstructed despite several attempts, two major clades were identified previously using nuclear <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and mitochondrial DNA markers <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The first clade is northern, cold-water and relatively stress-susceptible (lineage 1 in <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
</abbrgrp>), and contains <it>F. serratus </it>and <it>F. distichus </it>(<it>sensu lato </it>
<abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
</abbrgrp>). The second clade (lineage 2) has a more southern extension with generally greater stress-tolerance, and contains <it>F. ceranoides, F. vesiculosus, F. spiralis, F. guiryi, F. virsoides </it>and <it>F. radicans</it>.</p>
<p>Our aim is to provide insight into marine speciation processes by inferring the phylogeny of the Fucaceae family. The study is particularly focused on unravelling the evolutionary history of radiative speciation within the genus <it>Fucus</it>, particularly the very speciose clade 2 (see below). In order to do this, we developed phylogenetic markers and used explicit biogeographic sampling of distinct populations and potentially novel species/entities suspected in clade 2 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. We also provide a temporal evolutionary hypothesis by calibrating the obtained phylogenies in geological time using the fossil record from extinct members of brown algae <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and information from a dated brown algal multilocus phylogeny <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The phylogenetic framework is integrated with paleo-reconstructions from the Earth's climatic history <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B39">39</abbr>
<abbr bid="B40">40</abbr>
<abbr bid="B41">41</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and landmass trends from plate tectonic movements <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B42">42</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, to provide a hypothesis explaining the major historical events in the evolutionary history of Fucaceae.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Results</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Sequences and trees</p>
</st>
<p>The dataset for the multi-gene phylogenetic analysis comprised 4878 aligned bp (1626 amino acids) stored in 13 partitions, each representing a different protein coding region (Additional file <supplr sid="S1">1</supplr>), based on the cDNA synthesized from isolated RNA from 84 individuals representing all genera in the Fucaceae.</p>
<suppl id="S1">
<title>
<p>Additional file 1</p>
</title>
<text>
<p>
<b>Incorporated cDNA sequences</b>. Annotations of coding region transcripts used in this study. Total and used length expressed in base pairs (bp) and amino acids (aa) as well as primer sequences are presented. As P, we indicate the partition number for each region used in mixed analyses.</p>
</text>
<file name="1471-2148-11-371-S1.DOC">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
<p>The analyses yielded a well-defined phylogenetic hypothesis for the Fucaceae. Replicate runs of the Bayesian approach (see methods) converged onto similar posterior distributions after less than 5% of the 10<sup>6 </sup>generations. Phylogenetic reconstructions provided high confidence except for the branching of taxa <it>F. radicans </it>and <it>F. gardneri</it>. Relationships among <it>Fucus </it>species, with the exception of the most recently diverged entity <it>F. radicans </it>were resolved using this cDNA dataset.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Genomic divergence at protein-coding loci</p>
</st>
<p>Analysis of the 13 partial coding sequences provided 395 variable sites, 31 of which were identified as singletons (see Additional file <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr> for accession numbers). Intra-specific nucleotide (nt) variability in the genomic data set was low, ranging from zero to 10 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in the most diverse species, <it>Pelvetiopsis limitata </it>(Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). Intra-specific diversity, measured as the average number of nucleotide differences between pairwise sequences across all loci (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>), revealed two significantly more diverse species: <it>P. limitata </it>(14.67) and <it>Hesperophycus californicus </it>(7.33). All the other species showed average values below 3 nucleotide differences.</p>
<suppl id="S2">
<title>
<p>Additional file 2</p>
</title>
<text>
<p>
<b>Sampling sites and GeneBank accession numbers of all incorporated cDNA sequences</b>.</p>
</text>
<file name="1471-2148-11-371-S2.XLS">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
<tbl id="T1"><title><p>Table 1</p></title><caption><p>Genomic data estimations</p></caption><tblbdy cols="17">
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c cspan="3" ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Fucus clade 1</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="7" ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Fucus clade 2</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Species</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>F.serratus</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>F.evanescens</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>F.gardneri</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>F.radicans</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>F.ceranoides</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>F.spiralis</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>F.guiryi</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>F.virsoides</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>F. vesiculosus Northern</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>F. vesiculosus Southern</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>H.ca<it>lifornicus</it></b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>P.ca<it>naliculata</it></b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>P.limitata</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>S.com<it>pressa</it></b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>A.nodosum</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="17">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>F. serratus</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.56</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.004 &#177; 0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.004 &#177; 0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.006 &#177; 0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.007 &#177; 0.002</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.006 &#177; 0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.007 &#177; 0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.008 &#177; 0.002</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.006 &#177; 0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.006 &#177; 0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.014 &#177; 0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.026 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.014 &#177; 0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.027 &#177; 0.005</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.026 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Fucus lineage 1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>F. evanescens</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.35</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.67</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.001 &#177; 0.000</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.007 &#177; 0.002</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.008 &#177; 0.002</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.007 &#177; 0.002</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.007 &#177; 0.002</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.009 &#177; 0.002</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.007 &#177; 0.002</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.007 &#177; 0.002</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.015 &#177; 0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.027 &#177; 0.005</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.015 &#177; 0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.028 &#177; 0.005</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.027 &#177; 0.005</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>F. gardneri</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.38</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.09</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.00</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.007 &#177; 0.002</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.008 &#177; 0.002</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.007 &#177; 0.002</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.008 &#177; 0.002</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.009 &#177; 0.002</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.008 &#177; 0.002</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.008 &#177; 0.002</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.016 &#177; 0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.027 &#177; 0.005</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.015 &#177; 0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.029 &#177; 0.005</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.027 &#177; 0.005</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>F. radicans</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.61</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.68</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.72</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.00</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.002 &#177; 0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.000 &#177; 0.000</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.000 &#177; 0.000</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.002 &#177; 0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.000 &#177; 0.000</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.000 &#177; 0.000</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.014 &#177; 0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.024 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.013 &#177; 0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.025 &#177; 0.005</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.025 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>F. ceranoides</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.67</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.75</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.79</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.22</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.67</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.002 &#177; 0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.003 &#177; 0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.004 &#177; 0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.002 &#177; 0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.002 &#177; 0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.014 &#177; 0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.025 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.013 &#177; 0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.026 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.025 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Fucus lineage 2</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>F. spiralis</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.61</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.69</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.72</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.22</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.44</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.000 &#177; 0.000</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.002 &#177; 0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.000 &#177; 0.000</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.000 &#177; 0.000</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.014 &#177; 0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.024 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.013 &#177; 0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.025 &#177; 0.005</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.025 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>F. guiryi</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.64</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.71</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.75</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.03</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.25</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.04</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.27</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.002 &#177; 0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.000 &#177; 0.000</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.000 &#177; 0.000</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.014 &#177; 0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.025 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.013 &#177; 0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.026 &#177; 0.005</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.025 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>F. virsoides</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.78</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.86</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.9</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.18</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.4</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.18</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.21</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.00</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.002 &#177; 0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.002 &#177; 0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.015 &#177; 0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.026 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.015 &#177; 0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.027 &#177; 0.005</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.027 &#177; 0.005</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>F. vesiculosus Northern</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.62</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.69</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.73</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.01</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.23</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.02</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.04</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.19</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.78</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.000 &#177; 0.000</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.014 &#177; 0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.024 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.013 &#177; 0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.026 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.025 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>F. vesiculosus Southern</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.61</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.69</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.73</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.01</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.23</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.01</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.04</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.19</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.02</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.78</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.014 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.024 &#177; 0.005</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.013 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.025 &#177; 0.005</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.025 &#177; 0.005</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>H. californicus</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.38</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.46</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.49</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.31</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.33</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.31</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.34</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.48</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.32</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.31</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>7.33</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.025 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.008 &#177; 0.002</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.027 &#177; 0.005</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.025 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>P. canaliculata</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.47</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.55</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.58</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.32</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.34</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.32</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.35</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.49</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.33</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.32</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.41</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.00</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.024 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.027 &#177; 0.005</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.025 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>P. limitata</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.34</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.41</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.45</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.22</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.25</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.23</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.25</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.40</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.23</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.23</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>0.74</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.25</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>14.67</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.024 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.023 &#177; 0.004</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>S. compressa</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.57</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.69</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.72</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.41</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.44</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.42</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.44</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.59</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.42</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.42</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.60</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.54</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.30</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.67</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.014 &#177; 0.003</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>Number of base substitutions per site and standard error (1000 bootstraps) calculated using the maximum composite likelihood method (<abbrgrp><abbr bid="B92">92</abbr></abbrgrp> provided in MEGA v4.1 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B93">93</abbr></abbrgrp>; above diagonal) and percentage of divergence based on average number of differences (below diagonal) between species. Divergence levels lower than 1% as well as zero substitutions are emphasized. Diagonal elements: number of pairwise differences within species.</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<p>The highest inter-species differentiation was seen between the genus <it>Fucus </it>and all the other Fucaceae, ranging from 1.58% to a maximum of 3.05% (0.013 to 0.027 average number of substitutions per site). The lowest differentiation between genera was that between <it>H. californicus </it>and <it>P. limitata </it>(0.87% and 0.008 &#177; 0.002 average number of substitutions per site), which is close to values found between species of the two major <it>Fucus </it>clades (less than 0.8% and 0.008 &#177; 0.002). The heat shock 90 family protein-coding gene had a 3-codon insertion in <it>Silvetia compressa </it>that clearly differentiated this species, despite it displaying low genetic differentiation from a sister genus, here <it>A. nodosum </it>(1.5%).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Multi-gene phylogeny of the family Fucaceae</p>
</st>
<p>Both maximum likelihood and Bayesian-based reconstruction algorithms yielded similar topologies (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>), differing mostly in the branch lengths and support values. All current species were resolved except the recent Baltic species <it>F. radicans</it>, and all nodes that split different species showed high support for both algorithms. Phylogenies built using cDNA nucleotide sequences therefore resulted in much improved resolution over previously used markers, despite lower genetic distances than earlier described with ITS. Re-analysis of ITS data <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp> confidently inferred the <it>Ascophyllum - Silvetia </it>clade to root the remaining divergence events in the Fucaceae using the 13 cDNA loci.</p>
<fig id="F1"><title><p>Figure 1</p></title><caption><p>Multi-gene phylogenetic reconstruction from 13 cDNA loci</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Multi-gene phylogenetic reconstruction from 13 cDNA loci</b>. Multi-gene phylogenetic reconstructions using 13 nuclear transcriptomic regions. Shown are the 50% majority rule consensus tree of maximum likelihood bootstraps (left) and the 50% majority rule percentage of support for clades given by Bayesian posterior probabilities from one million generation MCMC analysis (right). cDNA trees were rooted using as outgroup the most basal genera, <it>Ascophyllum </it>and <it>Silvetia</it>, determined as basal according to phylogenetic re-analysis of Fucaceae ITS data using its sister families as outgroup <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp> (see details in Methods section for the analyses performed based on <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp> and Additional file <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr> for the corresponding phylogenetic reconstruction).</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2148-11-371-1" hint_layout="double"/></fig>
<p>The 13 protein-coding genes identified the same two major clades within <it>Fucus </it>as ITS (<abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and reanalyzed data in Additional file <supplr sid="S3">3</supplr>) and mitochondrial DNA <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In <it>Fucus </it>clade 1, two subclades were again recovered. Dioecious <it>F. serratus </it>and the hermaphroditic group corresponding to <it>F. distichus sensu lato</it>, in which our sampling of the geographic extremes revealed low intra-specific divergence.</p>
<suppl id="S3">
<title>
<p>Additional file 3</p>
</title>
<text>
<p>
<b>Separate analyses of ribosomal nuclear DNA together with ITS regions (see Methods section: estimation of ancestral character states)</b>. Phylogenetic reconstructions using 5.8 S ribosomal nuclear DNA together with ITS-1 and ITS-2 regions (re-analysis of data from <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp> after testing for best fit model). Values shown are the 50% majority rule percentage of support for clades given by Bayesian posterior probabilities from one million generation MCMC analysis (above) and the 50% majority rule consensus tree of maximum likelihood bootstraps (below). <it>H. banskii </it>was used as outgroup to root the phylogenetic reconstructions (as in <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp>). These results were also used to root the multi-gene phylogenetic trees since the specificity of primers used to amplify transcriptomic regions in the Fucaceae did not allow amplification outside this group. Topology is based on maximum likelihood reconstruction.</p>
</text>
<file name="1471-2148-11-371-S3.EPS">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
<p>In contrast with the polytomy found previously <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, species relationships within clade 2 were resolved (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>), with the exception of <it>F. radicans </it>(see below). The earliest diverging lineage leads to the estuarine species <it>F. ceranoides</it>. This is followed by the discovery that <it>F. vesiculosus </it>is not monophyletic, but is split according to geographical location of the samples into a northern (splitting earlier from the remaining species; Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>, ML phylogeny), and a southern clade. The latter shares a common ancestor with the hermaphroditic species in this lineage. The southern <it>F. vesiculosus </it>samples appear to form two distinct clades of geographically similar individuals (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>, Bayesian phylogeny) but they are grouped in a single clade in the Bayesian inferences based on the coalescent and Yule speciation models (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr> and Additional file <supplr sid="S4">4</supplr>). The recently derived species <it>F. radicans </it>was not resolved and grouped with sympatric northern <it>F. vesiculosus</it>. All of these dioecious species/entities were basal to the clade containing the three hermaphroditic species, the Mediterranean endemic <it>F. virsoides </it>branching first, followed by the clade containing <it>F. spiralis </it>and the recently described southern species <it>F. guiryi </it>
<abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, that was clearly differentiated from <it>F. spiralis </it>with high node values for both algorithms. Phylogenetic trees in Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr> were built after excluding <it>F. guiryi </it>individuals from the introgressed contact range (see discussion). The resulting trees including those individuals (shown in Additional file <supplr sid="S5">5</supplr>) show the effects of introgressed individuals in confounding the inference of vertical lineage splitting <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<fig id="F2"><title><p>Figure 2</p></title><caption><p>Bayesian dating of Fucaceae diversification</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Bayesian dating of Fucaceae diversification</b>. Simplified Bayesian dated phylogenetic reconstruction using the 13 coding loci. Node ages in million years (Myr) with their 95% HPD interval for both expansion growth (violet bars) and Yule speciation (cyan bars) models correspond to the time scale at the bottom of the Figure. Polytomies within species were collapsed for clarity, extracting the most divergent individuals (= leaf) from the Bayesian dating of Fucaceae diversification (for full tree see Additional file <supplr sid="S4">4</supplr>) Each paleogeographic reconstruction is placed at the estimated age (reproduced with permission of Dr. R. Blakey). Temperature graph shows paleoclimate reconstructions according to Zachos et al. (<abbrgrp><abbr bid="B40">40</abbr></abbrgrp>; Paleocene to Miocene), Lisiecki et al. (<abbrgrp><abbr bid="B41">41</abbr></abbrgrp>; Pliocene to Pleistocene) and Petit et al. (<abbrgrp><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr></abbrgrp>, Holocene) (reproduced with permission of Dr. R.A. Rohde). The ages and their correlation to the names on the geological timescale are based on Gradstein et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B91">91</abbr></abbrgrp>. Recent history of the Bering Strait is shown with the estimated and hypothesized openings <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2148-11-371-2" hint_layout="double"/></fig>
<suppl id="S4">
<title>
<p>Additional file 4</p>
</title>
<text>
<p>
<b>Bayesian dating of Fucaceae diversification using cDNA</b>. Full tree showing the Bayesian dated phyloreconstruction using the 13 coding loci. Node ages in million years (Myr) correspond to the time scale at the bottom of the figure.</p>
</text>
<file name="1471-2148-11-371-S4.EPS">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
<suppl id="S5">
<title>
<p>Additional file 5</p>
</title>
<text>
<p>
<b>Multi-gene phylogenetic reconstruction from cDNA (see Methods section: Multi-gene phylogenetic analyses of cDNA sequences) including introgressed sequences</b>. Multi-gene phylogenetic relationships as shown in Figure 1 but adding sequences of <it>F. guiryi </it>from northern Portugal, where the species co-occurs in sympatry with <it>F. vesiculosus </it>and <it>F. spiralis</it>, creating an introgressed range for <it>F. guiryi </it>that continues northwards <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
<abbr bid="B47">47</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Methods are the same as described for Figure 1. Comparison of this tree with Figure 1 illustrates the effect of introgressed contact regions in preventing phylogenetic resolution, by confounding vertical lineage splitting with horizontal introgressive mixing.</p>
</text>
<file name="1471-2148-11-371-S5.EPS">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Evolutionary rates and molecular dating</p>
</st>
<p>Bayesian MCMC inference resulted in an estimate of the mean evolutionary rate across Fucaceae of 0.0016 substitutions per thousand years (95% confidence interval 0.0008 to 0.0025). We emphasize that, taking into account the confidence intervals, the evolutionary rates for the separate coding genes largely overlapped and the coefficient of variation across the tree was 0.6. The nucleotide substitutions per site range from values close to zero for comparisons within <it>Fucus </it>spp. up to 0.029 &#177; 0.005 for the whole family (<it>S. compressa </it>and <it>F. gardneri</it>; Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>).</p>
<p>Coalescent theory and the Yule speciation model were used to evaluate the history of Fucaceae (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>). Trees agree well with Bayesian and ML phylogenetic reconstructions (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). Both demographic models broadly coincided when used to infer dates for the nodes placed near the origin of all Fucaceae genera, but differed considerably in dating recent speciation events, particularly within <it>Fucus</it>. The time intervals reported are maximally conservative and correspond to the range for both demographic models together. Our molecular dating leads to an estimate for the origin of the diversification of Fucaceae around 19.5-7.0 million years ago (Ma) (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr> and Additional file <supplr sid="S6">6</supplr>). The origin of the lineage leading to <it>Pelvetia canaliculata</it>, eventually resulting in an Atlantic invasion, was dated at 16.4 to 5.4 Ma. Divergence between the lineages leading to <it>Ascophyllum nodosum </it>and to the genus <it>Silvetia </it>(11.7 to 1 Ma) was coincident in time with the split of the lineage leading to <it>H. californicus </it>and <it>P. limitata </it>from the <it>Fucus </it>genus lineage (12.2 to 2.7 Ma). Both of these splits correspond to a Pacific-Atlantic crossing by members of the lineages now represented by the genera <it>Ascophyllum </it>and <it>Fucus </it>in the Atlantic. The diversification of the genus <it>Fucus </it>into two clades was estimated at 9.5 to 1.6 Ma. All the predicted speciation events within each <it>Fucus </it>clade were placed within the last 3.8 million years (Myr).</p>
<suppl id="S6">
<title>
<p>Additional file 6</p>
</title>
<text>
<p>
<b>Bayesian dating of Fucaceae diversification using nuclear ribosomal DNA: the 5.8 S gene together with ITS-1 and ITS-2 regions</b>. Bayesian dated phyloreconstruction using nuclear ribosomal DNA, the 5.8 S together with ITS-1 and ITS-2 regions. Node ages in million years (Myr) with their 95% HPD interval correspond to the time scale at the bottom of the figure. Node age estimates were obtained using an uncorrelated log-normal relaxed clock under GTR model of evolution. Tree priors were fixed on Yule speciation model of demographic history. One individual of <it>Cystoseira neglecta, C. osmundacea </it>and <it>C. setchellii </it>species were included as representatives of the family Sargassaceae for the inferences (<abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B94">94</abbr>
</abbrgrp>; accession numbers: AY542816, AY542819 and AY542812). Monophyletic constraints were imposed for the nodes that were used to calibrate the evolutionary rates. Normal priors were used for the times to the most recent common ancestor (tmrca) of Fucaceae and Sargassaceae families (Medium Chattium to Aquitanium age from Miocene epoch: mean 22.5 million years (Myr); standard deviation 2.5 Myr <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
</abbrgrp>). Results were processed as described in the methods section.</p>
</text>
<file name="1471-2148-11-371-S6.PDF">
   <p>Click here for file</p>
</file>
</suppl>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Tests of mating system evolutionary hypotheses</p>
</st>
<p>The best fitting model for the different diversification hypotheses related to the evolution of mating systems (see Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr> and estimation of ancestral character states and diversification in the Methods section) was the one-parameter Markov k-state model (MK1; <it>AIC </it>= 104.522). This model indicates that speciation (&#955;) and extinction (&#956;) rates were state-independent &#955;<it>
<sub>dioecious </sub>
</it>= &#955;<it>
<sub>hermaphroditic </sub>
</it>= 0.24; &#956;<it>
<sub>dioecious </sub>
</it>= &#955;<it>
<sub>hermaphroditic </sub>
</it>= 0.14) and that the transition between character states was also bidirectional and state-independent (<it>q01 </it>= <it>q10 </it>= 0.56). Ancestral state reconstruction from the scaled likelihood of every state of the character (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>) resulted in poor resolution of deeper nodes, showing equal likelihood for either character state (dioecious <it>vs</it>. hermaphroditic). The node describing the state of the mrca of all <it>Fucus </it>species showed higher scaled likelihood for the state of dioecy (<it>logLik<sub>scaled </sub>
</it>= 0.63), as well as the other nodes involved in the evolution of the genus (<it>logLik<sub>scaled </sub>
</it>ranged from 0.54 to 0.84). However the two more recent ancestors of <it>F. virsoides, F. spiralis </it>and <it>F. guiryi </it>were estimated to have been hermaphroditic (<it>logLik<sub>scaled </sub>
</it>= 0.92 and 0.99, respectively). The common ancestor of <it>Hesperophycus </it>and <it>Pelvetiopsis </it>was also estimated as having been hermaphroditic (<it>logLik<sub>scaled </sub>
</it>= 0.62).</p>
<tbl id="T2"><title><p>Table 2</p></title><caption><p>Tests of mating system evolution hypotheses</p></caption><tblbdy cols="11">
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>Scenario</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>Df</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>&#955;0</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>&#955;1</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>&#956;0</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>&#956;1</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>q01</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>q10</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>logLik</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>AIC</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>P</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="11">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Asymmetric parameters</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>6</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.000</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.289</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.398</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.000</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.441</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.524</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-48.299</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>108.597</p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Asymmetric speciation</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>4</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.000</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.350</p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>&#956;1~&#956;0</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>q01~q10</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-48.519</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>105.040</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&#183;</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Asymmetric extinction</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>4</p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>&#955;1~&#955;0</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.364</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.000</p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>q01~q10</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-48.997</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>106.000</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&#183;</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Source (dioecious)-sink system</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>4</p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>&#955;1~&#955;0</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>&#956;1~&#956;0</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.086</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-54.358</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>114.720</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>*</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Source (hermaphoditic)-sink system</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>4</p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>&#955;1~&#955;0</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>&#956;1~&#956;0</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.073</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-52.686</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>111.370</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>**</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Symmetric parameters (MK1)</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3</p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>&#955;1~&#955;0</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>&#956;1~&#956;0</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>q01~q10</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-49.261</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>104.522</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&#183;</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Sink-sink system (MK2)</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>4</p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>&#955;1~&#955;0</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>&#956;1~&#956;0</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.758</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.538</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-49.068</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>106.135</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&#183;</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="11" ca="center">
            <p>Significance codes: 0 &lt; *** &lt; 0.001 &lt; ** &lt; 0.01 &lt; * &lt; 0.05 &lt; &#183; &lt; 0.1 &lt; NS &lt; 1</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>Speciation (&#955;), extinction (&#956;) and transition (<it>q</it>) rates between the two states of the mating system character (0, dioecious; 1, hermaphroditic). Complete asymmetric model and different scenarios of state-independent and state-dependent diversification (rates constrained to be equal), and unidirectional and bidirectional transitions were tested: 1) asymmetric model; 2) asymmetric speciation or state-independent extinction and transition rates; 3) asymmetric extinction or state-independent speciation and transition rates; 4) Source (dioecious)- sink system or state-independent diversification rates and transition from hermaphroditic to dioecious state constrained to 0; 5) Source (hermaphroditic)- sink system or state-independent diversification rates and transition from dioecious to hermaphroditic state constrained to 0; 6) symmetric parameters or MK1 model; 7) Sink-sink system or MK2 model <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B81">81</abbr><abbr bid="B82">82</abbr><abbr bid="B83">83</abbr><abbr bid="B84">84</abbr><abbr bid="B86">86</abbr></abbrgrp>. Log-likelihood, Akaike information criteria (AIC) and log-likelihood ratio test (P) are also provided for comparison between models.</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<fig id="F3"><title><p>Figure 3</p></title><caption><p>Mapping character evolution</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Mapping character evolution</b>. Mapping character evolution for mating system (dioecious <it>vs</it>. hermaphroditic) on the simplified Bayesian dated phylogenetic reconstruction (see Figure 2 and methods section), where scaled likelihood of each character state is represented as pie graphics on the nodes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B80">80</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2148-11-371-3" hint_layout="single"/></fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Tests of geographic hypotheses related to the Bering Strait oceanic boundary</p>
</st>
<p>The testing of hypotheses related to geographic (i.e., Pacific <it>vs</it>. Atlantic/Arctic) origin and diversification (see Table <tblr tid="T3">3</tblr> and estimation of ancestral character states and diversification from the Methods section) showed the GeoSSE model as having the best fit (<it>AIC </it>= 107.66, <it>log-likelihood </it>= -46.83). The model indicates that diversification rates were state-dependent (<it>s<sub>Pacific </sub>
</it>= 0.195; <it>s<sub>Atlantic </sub>
</it>= 0.019; <it>x<sub>Pacific </sub>
</it>= 0.049; <it>x<sub>Atlantic </sub>
</it>= 0.000), and that the dispersal rates between the two geographic regions (both sides of the Bering Strait) were almost unidirectional from the Pacific (<it>d<sub>Pacific to Atlantic </sub>
</it>= 0.075). The DEC model also reported low dispersal (0.032) and extinction (0.000) rates (<it>log.likelihood </it>= -13.25). Ancestral state reconstruction was also performed for the sink-sink GeoSSE model (second best model like MK2) and DEC models (Figure <figr fid="F4">4a</figr> and <figr fid="F4">4b</figr>, respectively). Deeper nodes were poorly resolved by the sink-sink model, showing similar scaled likelihoods for either character state (Pacific <it>vs</it>. Atlantic; Figure <figr fid="F4">4a</figr>), but DEC provided better estimates for the alternative scenarios (branches in Figure <figr fid="F4">4b</figr>). Estimates of the geographic origin of the family were similar for Pacific and Atlantic Oceans using the GeoSSE model (<it>logLik<sub>scaled </sub>
</it>= 0.42 and 0.58, respectively), while the DEC model placed the origin in the Pacific (<it>logLik<sub>scaled </sub>
</it>= 0.47) or in both biogeographic areas across the Bering Strait (<it>logLik<sub>scaled </sub>
</it>= 0.32; pie on nodes in Figure <figr fid="F4">4b</figr>). This last observation agrees with the rate of between-region mode of speciation obtained by the GeoSSE model (<it>s<sub>Pacific-Atlantic </sub>
</it>= 1.225) that was higher than within-region speciation rates. Alternatively, these results also agree with hypothetical divergence along the boundary between both regions in the Arctic Ocean. The most recent common ancestor to <it>Fucus </it>was estimated as Atlantic (<it>logLik<sub>scaled </sub>
</it>= 0.86 and 0.63 for both GeoSSE and DEC models, respectively). Finally, both models predicted an Atlantic ancestor of <it>F. serratus </it>and <it>F. distichus </it>(clade 1; <it>logLik<sub>scaled </sub>
</it>= 0.70 for the nodes and 0.53 for the inheritance scenario).</p>
<tbl id="T3"><title><p>Table 3</p></title><caption><p>Tests of biogeographical hypotheses</p></caption><tblbdy cols="12">
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>Scenario</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>Df</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>sA</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>sB</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>sAB</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>xA</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>xB</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>dA</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>dB</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>logLik</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>AIC</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>P</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="12">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Assymetric parameters</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>7</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.195</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.019</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.225</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.049</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.000</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.070</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.000</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-46.828</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>107.656</p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Assymetric speciation</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>5</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.164</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.020</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.225</p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>xA~xB</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>dA~dB</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-48.775</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>107.550</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>NS</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Assymetric extinction</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>5</p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>sA~sB</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.225</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.058</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.029</p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>dA~dB</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-51.580</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>113.160</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>**</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Symmetric parameters</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>4</p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>sA~sB</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.225</p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>xA~xB</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>dA~dB</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-51.636</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>111.270</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>**</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Sink-sink system</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>5</p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>sA~sB</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.225</p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>
               <it>xA~xB</it>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.075</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.000</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-50.172</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>110.340</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>*</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Unconstrained DEC</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2</p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>-</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-</p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>0.032</p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>0.000</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-13.25</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Stratified biogeographical DEC model</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2</p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>-</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-</p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>0.010</p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="2" ca="center">
            <p>0.061</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-16.45</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="12" ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Significance codes: 0 &lt; *** &lt; 0.001 &lt; ** &lt; 0.01 &lt; * &lt; 0.05 &lt; &#183; &lt; 0.1 &lt; NS &lt; 1</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>Speciation (<it>s</it>), extinction (<it>x</it>) and dispersal (<it>d</it>) rates between the two biogeographical regions on either side of the Bering Strait (A, Pacific Ocean; B, Atlantic Ocean, including most of the Arctic). Complete asymmetric model and different scenarios of state-independent and state-dependent diversification (rates constrained to be equal), and unidirectional and bidirectional dispersal were tested: 1) asymmetric model; 2) asymmetric speciation, state-independent extinction and dispersal rates; 3) asymmetric extinction, state-independent speciation and dispersal rates; 4) symmetric parameters; 7) Sink-sink system <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B86">86</abbr></abbrgrp>. Log-likelihood, Akaike information criteria (AIC) and log-likelihood ratio test (P) are also provided for comparison between models. Dispersal and local extinction parameters estimated by DEC models are also shown <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B88">88</abbr><abbr bid="B89">89</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<fig id="F4"><title><p>Figure 4</p></title><caption><p>Mapping character evolution</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Mapping character evolution</b>. Mapping character evolution for biogeographic range, where scaled likelihood of each character state is represented as pie graphics on the nodes (a) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B80">80</abbr></abbrgrp>. Ancestral range subdivision/inheritance biogeographic scenarios, where color on branches shows hypothesised scenario (b) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B88">88</abbr><abbr bid="B89">89</abbr></abbrgrp>; unsolved branch-scenarios are coloured in red but then, scaled likelihood meaning either side of Bering Strait, thus Arctic and Atlantic <it>vs</it>. Pacific is provided. Character evolution is traced on the simplified Bayesian dated phylogenetic reconstruction (see Figure 2 and methods section). Note that <it>F. distichus </it>was analysed as either Atlantic and Pacific.</p>
</text><graphic file="1471-2148-11-371-4" hint_layout="double"/></fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Discussion</p>
</st>
<p>A multi-gene phylogenetic approach resulted in a much finer resolution of relationships at the tips of the tree compared with previous phylogenies. This framework allowed the estimation of dates of divergence and patterns of speciation across the family and within the recently radiated genus <it>Fucus</it>.</p>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Dating inter-ocean divergence events in Fucaceae</p>
</st>
<p>The models used returned similar dated intervals on deeper nodes corresponding to the splitting events of ancestral Fucaceae lineages, but were less congruent in dating recent speciation events. This is likely due to the constraints of the priors used <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B43">43</abbr>
<abbr bid="B44">44</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Although we remain conservative by reporting the range for both models, the narrower and more recent coalescent-based intervals at the tips of the tree are more in agreement with the biological processes associated with speciation in these taxa <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B45">45</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>The most likely origin of the Fucaceae is in the Pacific Ocean during the mid to late Miocene (19.5-7.0 Ma, estimated based on 23-7 Ma from <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and 19.4-8.0 Ma from ITS; see Additional file <supplr sid="S6">6</supplr>), when an ancestor of the Fucaceae might have been able to colonize the North Pacific, splitting from the Australasian sister lineages Xiphophoraceae and Hormosiraceae <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Despite support for both alternative hypotheses for the Fucaceae geographic origin, a Pacific origin involves a more direct route from the southern (Australasia) to the northern Pacific (and is supported by diversification rates and the DEC model), whereas the alternative hypothesis of an Atlantic origin requires a more complex dispersal path. A Pacific origin is also consistent with the northward drift of the Australasian landmass towards Eurasia in the Miocene and a gradual decrease in global temperatures (14-12 Ma, see Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>; <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B40">40</abbr>
</abbrgrp>), which would have favored crossing of the equatorial fringe. The origin of the Fucaceae would then be due to subsequent divergence in the North Pacific.</p>
<p>Our data indicate that four independent Fucaceae lineages crossed the Bering Strait. The first crossing, estimated at 16.4-5.4 Ma (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>), involved the splitting of the Atlantic lineage leading to <it>Pelvetia canaliculata</it>, and could only have taken place during the earliest openings of the Bering Strait suggested for the Late Miocene (13.0-11.0 and 7.3-6.6 Ma; <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
</abbrgrp>). Pacific diatoms found in Atlantic marine sediments indicate the existence of a strait at that time <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, supporting such early Pacific-Atlantic colonizations. The alternatives to this scenario, other than methodological bias in dating, require either accelerated lineage divergence following the trans-Arctic crossing, or the start of divergence before the trans-Arctic crossing. The latter is unlikely because <it>Pelvetia </it>is currently monotypic with no extant Pacific representatives. While the extreme upper intertidal distribution and stress tolerance of Atlantic <it>P. canaliculata</it>, makes accelerated selective ecological divergence a plausible explanation, it is unnecessary to invoke it if earlier openings of the Bering Strait occurred <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. A second (and probably later; 11.5-1.1 Ma, Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>) trans-Arctic crossing led to the Atlantic genus <it>Ascophyllum</it>, following a split from its Pacific sister genus <it>Silvetia</it>, coincident with the Bering Strait opening at 5.5-5.4 Ma <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. These results contradict the previous ITS phylogeny of <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp> but agree with these data after their re-analysis with better fit models (see methods). It revealed <it>Ascophyllum </it>as sister to the Pacific genus <it>Silvetia </it>and placed the <it>Ascophyllum-Silvetia </it>in a basal clade to the Fucaceae, a hypothesis also raised by <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>The third (possibly simultaneous) trans-Arctic crossing, and the most successful in terms of subsequent speciation, was the split between the current <it>Hesperophycus-Pelvetiopsis </it>in the Pacific and the lineage leading to <it>Fucus</it>, of which all current species are Atlantic except the circum-Arctic <it>F. distichus </it>complex. This divergence, estimated at 12.2-2.7 Ma, coincides both in time and reproductive mode (shifting from hermaphroditic to dioecious) with the <it>Ascophyllum </it>lineage split from the <it>Silvetia </it>clade. The timing of both lineage splitting events leading to <it>Ascophyllum </it>and <it>Fucus </it>centers around the opening of the Bering Strait 5.5-5.4 Ma when, despite moving against the predominant Atlantic-Pacific flow, the warmer climate (see Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>) might have facilitated stepping stone colonization and migration across the Arctic. Ancestral state reconstructions (Figure <figr fid="F4">4</figr>) place the most recent common ancestor of <it>Fucus </it>in the Atlantic/Arctic ocean basin, suggesting that it was here that subsequent diversification took place. The alternative hypothesis, deserving further study, is that the opening of the Bering Strait led to a vicariant split between clade 1 in the Pacific and clade 2 in the Atlantic. An additional interesting question remains as to why, following similar colonization conditions by ecologically similar lineages, <it>Ascophyllum </it>is currently a monotypic genus whereas <it>Fucus </it>underwent relatively extensive speciation.</p>
<p>The fourth trans-Arctic crossing involved the evolutionary history of Arctic vicariance in <it>Fucus </it>clade 1. The ancestor to clade 1 was estimated as Atlantic (Figure <figr fid="F4">4</figr>), and the Atlantic-Pacific dichotomy might be more accurately described as Arctic to agree with the geographical and ecological range of current representatives. The ancestral state reconstruction implies that <it>F. serratus/F. distichus </it>diverged in the Atlantic and/or within the Arctic basin, which represent the same side of the Bering Strait, with subsequent invasion of the Pacific by the <it>F. distichus </it>lineage. Although Atlantic (previously named <it>F. evanescens</it>) and Pacific (previously named <it>F. gardneri</it>) samples of <it>F. distichus </it>used in this phylogeny correspond to the geographical extremes of the ranges found within the <it>F. distichus </it>complex <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
<abbr bid="B46">46</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, estimated Pacific-Atlantic divergence times based on coalescence are very recent (mid-Pleistocene) (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>). Thus our data do not contradict the current designation of these lineages as a single species, <it>F. distichus </it>(see <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
</abbrgrp>), but do not rule out low levels of vicariant divergence (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>), also in agreement with Coyer et al. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Driving south: a biogeographical hypothesis for the evolution of Fucus clade 2</p>
</st>
<p>The earliest branching member of the clade is the dioecious lineage <it>F. ceranoides</it>. The contemporary cold-temperate distribution of <it>F. ceranoides </it>from Norway to North Portugal is similar to the present day range of <it>F. serratus </it>in clade 1 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, which has a coincident speciation time (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>). Nuclear and organelle phylogenies for <it>F. ceranoides </it>are congruent in the southern part of the range, while to the north of the English Channel populations harbour exclusively introgressed organellar genomes captured from <it>F. vesiculosus </it>that have spread by genetic surfing during postglacial range expansion <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B36">36</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. This is not the only case of organellar introgression in this clade <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, emphasizing that organellar sequences can be equivocal for phylogenetic inferences in taxa prone to introgression. <it>F. vesiculosus </it>was shown here to be polyphyletic. Two clades were well separated within <it>F. vesiculosus </it>according to their range distributions from: i) Iberia to the south <it>versus</it>, ii) the English Channel to the north. These are also differentiated at microsatellite loci <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
<abbr bid="B29">29</abbr>
<abbr bid="B47">47</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, both in allelic frequencies and in the presence of private alleles, but were not recovered previously with mitochondrial markers <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, possibly due to masking by extensive organellar introgression-expansion dynamics that can take place in <it>Fucus </it>species <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B36">36</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Importantly, the southern <it>F. vesiculosus </it>share a common ancestor with the remaining members of the same lineage, all of which are hermaphroditic. The two divergent lineages in what is currently named <it>F. vesiculosus </it>coincide in present distribution with two marine glacial refugia (Iberia and Brittany; <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
</abbrgrp>). A split of southern <it>F. vesiculosus </it>into two clades suggested by certain analyses (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr> and Additional file <supplr sid="S4">4</supplr> and <supplr sid="S5">5</supplr>) deserves further investigation, but could result from introgressive signatures with <it>F. guiryi</it>, which may be found in sympatry in some regions <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
<abbr bid="B47">47</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, but not in the southernmost sites where the two species are allopatric <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
<abbr bid="B30">30</abbr>
</abbrgrp> (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr> and Additional file <supplr sid="S5">5</supplr>).</p>
<p>Divergence of the hermaphroditic lineage in clade 2 (leading to <it>F. virsoides, F. spiralis </it>and <it>F. guiryi</it>) from their dioecious sister lineage may have been driven or at least maintained by reproductive isolation derived from a selfing reproductive mode. Once a hermaphroditic lineage arises, selfing may follow rapidly, reinforcing genetic isolation and favouring subsequent differentiation <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B48">48</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Selfing can be advantageous in marginal and/or stressful habitats to conserve local adaptation and for reproductive assurance, both key selective pressures for intertidal broadcast spawners such as <it>Fucus </it>
<abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B49">49</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>The earliest divergence within the hermaphroditic clade is <it>F. virsoides</it>, currently restricted to the northern Adriatic Sea, a possible remnant from a more extensive distribution during a cooler glacial period. More recently, the lineage split between <it>F. guiryi </it>and <it>F. spiralis </it>coincides with southern <it>vs</it>. northern ranges. Along the southern range, <it>Fucus </it>species are segregated by habitat, i.e., open coast (<it>F. guiryi</it>) <it>versus </it>estuaries and coastal lagoons (southern <it>F. vesiculosus</it>), whereas further north, where they co-occur, <it>F. guiryi </it>undergoes introgression <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
<abbr bid="B47">47</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, which was hypothesized to reflect the absence of reinforcement during allopatric evolution <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B47">47</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The phylogenetic position of the high intertidal <it>F. spiralis </it>reported here is incongruent with mitochondrial data <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, possibly another case of extensive organellar introgression in this genus.</p>
<p>Our data, like previous ITS and mitochondrial data <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, do not resolve the relationship between the recently described <it>F. radicans </it>and <it>F. vesiculosus</it>. This is unsurprising given the suggested timescale of divergence (hundreds to at most thousands of years <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
</abbrgrp>), since the opening of the Baltic Sea (ca. 7 Kya), possibly facilitated by high adaptive potential of the common ancestor with <it>F. vesiculosus </it>
<abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
<abbr bid="B50">50</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Mating system evolution</p>
</st>
<p>The evolution of reproductive mode in the Fucaceae has followed a reticulate pattern of alternating dioecious and hermaphroditic lineages that challenges current understanding of mating system evolutionary trends (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>; e.g., <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
</abbrgrp>). Methods to estimate the influence of species' traits on lineage diversification establish hermaphroditic lineages as ancestral in the family, evolving into dioecious lineages, folowed by switches from dioecy to hermaphroditism in the genus <it>Fucus</it>, contradicting earlier suggestions <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
<abbr bid="B51">51</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. There is considerable support for hermaphroditism (cosexuality) as the ancestral state in plants <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, and simple genetic mechanisms of dioecious sex determination and sex chromosome evolution have been proposed (reviewed by <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B52">52</abbr>
<abbr bid="B53">53</abbr>
</abbrgrp>). It is intriguing that two of the three novel Atlantic lineages presumably coincided with a switch to dioecy (<it>Ascophyllum </it>and <it>Fucus</it>). The evolution of dioecy and increased evolutionary potential <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
</abbrgrp> may therefore have facilitated long-term establishment in the Atlantic, driven in part by the availability of extensive and novel habitats favouring large and dense populations. In contrast, hermaphroditic lineages are better colonizers of marginal habitats via increased reproductive assurance and the maintenance of locally adaptive traits.</p>
<p>The recent evolutionary trajectory of reproductive mode has been a switch towards hermaphroditism, and highly selfing mating systems, at least within <it>Fucus </it>lineage 2 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B29">29</abbr>
<abbr bid="B30">30</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The transition from outcrossing to selfing is common in plants <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B54">54</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, but with little evidence for reversion, suggesting an evolutionary dead-end <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
<abbr bid="B55">55</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. This in turn suggests that the hermaphroditic ancestors of the dioecious lineages leading to <it>Ascophyllum </it>and <it>Fucus </it>were not highly selfing.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Conclusions</p>
</st>
<p>The analysis of concatenated cDNA sequences from 13 partial coding regions resolved the evolutionary history of the Fucaceae, and allowed the dating of splitting events and tests of hypotheses concerning recent drivers of speciation. Diversification of the family could be placed in the Late-Mid Miocene. Four independent trans-Arctic colonisations were inferred, coincident with the split of the lineages leading to 1) <it>Pelvetia canaliculata</it>, 2) <it>Ascophyllum nodosum</it>, 3) the genus <it>Fucus</it>, and more recently 4) in the <it>F. distichus </it>species complex. Two dioecious lineages (originating the genera <it>Ascophyllum </it>and <it>Fucus</it>) evolved in the Atlantic/Arctic from hermaphroditic ancestors. Despite an earlier origin of the genus <it>Fucus</it>, most current species have evolved within a relatively short time frame starting 4-3 Ma in the Pleistocene. Both <it>Fucus </it>clades contain dioecious and hermaphroditic lineages, and recent speciation trends in clade 2 have given rise to hermaphroditic lineages from dioecious ancestors. Recent radiation in <it>Fucus </it>clade 2 coincides with divergence in physiological tolerance to environmental stresses and colonization of novel habitats at range edges, suggesting ecological speciation. In this clade, selfing lineages occur in the most extreme habitats, likely linked with reproductive assurance and the maintenance of local adaptation.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Methods</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Taxa distribution and sampling</p>
</st>
<p>All species of <it>Silvetia </it>and the monotypic genera <it>Pelvetiopsis </it>and <it>Hesperophycus </it>occur exclusively in the Pacific. <it>Pelvetia </it>and <it>Ascophyllum </it>are monotypic genera occurring exclusively in the Atlantic. All species of <it>Fucus </it>occur in the Atlantic and its adjacent seas except <it>F. distichus </it>(<it>sensu lato</it>), which is also found in the Pacific. At least 3 individuals from each of the 6 genera of Fucaceae were used in all analyses except for <it>Ascophyllum </it>and <it>Pelvetia </it>(2 individuals; Additional file <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr>).</p>
<p>Samples were collected from several locations from where it was possible to transport specimens alive or deep frozen in dry ice to prevent RNA degradation: 1 Pacific, 7 North Atlantic, 1 Baltic and 1 Mediterranean regions were used (Additional file <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr>). Sequences from a previous study <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
</abbrgrp> were also added (shown in Additional file <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr>). Fresh material was lyophilized and samples were stored at room temperature with silica drying crystals prior to RNA extraction <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B56">56</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and amplification</p>
</st>
<p>Lyophilized tissue was powdered for 5 min on a Mixer Mill (MM 300 - Retsch, Germany) and total RNA was isolated using the extraction method as described in Pearson et al. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B56">56</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. RNA integrity was confirmed by electrophoresis on 1.2% denaturing agarose gels. For reverse transcription, a solution of 1 &#956;g total RNA, 1 mM dNTPs and 5 &#956;M oligo d(T) was denatured at 70&#176;C for 5 min and placed on ice for &gt; 1 min. First Strand Buffer, DTT (0.1 M), RNase OUT and <it>SuperScript&#8482;</it>
</p>
<p>III (Invitrogen) were added, the mix was incubated at 55&#176;C for 1-2 h, and the reaction was then heat-inactivated at 80&#176;C for 10 min. A total of 13 coding regions were selected for sequence analysis (Additional file <supplr sid="S1">1</supplr>). Specific primers were designed from Expressed Sequence Tag (EST) consensus sequences in <it>F. vesiculosus </it>or <it>F. serratus </it>
<abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B57">57</abbr>
</abbrgrp> using Primer3 software version 0.4.0 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B58">58</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. PCR was carried out in 20 &#956;l reaction volumes containing 1-3 &#956;l of cDNA (1/40 dilution) as template, 1.5 mM, 0.2 &#956;M dNTPs, 0.5 &#956;M of each primer and 1 U of Taq polymerase, with the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94&#176;C for 3 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94&#176;C for 20 s, annealing at 58&#176;C for 90 s and a final extension at 65&#176;C for 5 min. Products were sequenced at the Centre of Marine Sciences, University of Algarve (ABI 3130xl). The resulting chromatograms were analyzed using CodonCode Aligner v1.6.3 (CodonCode Corp., Dedham, Massachusetts, USA).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Outgrouping procedure</p>
</st>
<p>The specificity of the cDNA primer sequences was too great to allow amplification of gene products outside the family Fucaceae, specifically for the sister families Xiphophoraceae and Hormosiraceae <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
<abbr bid="B59">59</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In order to include in the multi-gene phylogenetic estimations the sister families outside the Fucaceae, we used additional ITS sequence information from a previous study <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, but applyed more advanced methodological analyses. Those sequences were first re-aligned using MAFFT v6 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B60">60</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, using the E-INS-i option recommended for sequences with multiple conserved domains and long gaps <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B61">61</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. K80 plus I plus G was selected as the best model fit to the nucleotide data set based on AIC as implemented in MrModeltest <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B62">62</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. ITS dataset was analysed using maximum likelihood and Bayesian approaches as described above (see multi-gene phylogenetic analyses section). This rooted phylogenetic resolution of the genera in the Fucaceae based on ITS sequences was used to infer the basal genera of the family Fucaceae. These genera, <it>Ascophyllum </it>and <it>Silvetia </it>were used as outgroup to root the multi-gene phylogenetic analyses aimed at inferring the order of the previously unresolved speciation events.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Multi-gene phylogenetic analyses</p>
</st>
<p>The cDNA sequence dataset (Additional file <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr>) was aligned first using MAFFT v6 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B60">60</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, using the G-INS-i option recommended for sequences with global homology <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B61">61</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Models of sequence evolution were selected based on Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) as implemented in MrModeltest v2.3 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B62">62</abbr>
</abbrgrp> for each of the 13 partitions defined by each gene: Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano model (HKY; <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B63">63</abbr>
</abbrgrp>) was most appropriate for the 1st, 11th and 12th partitions, HKY plus I for 5th, 6th, 7th and 10th partitions and HKY plus G for 13th partition; Kimura 2-parameter (K80; <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B64">64</abbr>
</abbrgrp>) for 8th and 9th partitions, plus I for 2nd partition; Symmetrical model plus G (SYM; <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B65">65</abbr>
</abbrgrp>) for 3rd partition; and General Time Reversible (GTR; <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B66">66</abbr>
</abbrgrp>) plus I for 4th partition. The combined data set was analyzed as one partition using the GTR model plus I and G.</p>
<p>Maximum likelihood bootstrap analysis with 999 replicates was performed to infer the phylogenetic relationships for the combined data set using PhyML v3.0.1 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B67">67</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The substitution parameters were estimated over a neighbor-joining tree. Tree searching operations were set to best of nearest-neighbour interchange (NNI) with subtree pruning and regrafting (SPR). Partitioned Bremer support analysis <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B68">68</abbr>
</abbrgrp> was performed using TreeRot v2 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B69">69</abbr>
<abbr bid="B70">70</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, in order to provide a measure of how the different partitions of the data contributed to the Decay index for each node in the context of the combined data analysis.</p>
<p>Bayesian inferences were performed with MrBayes v3.1.2 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B71">71</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. For the partitioned analysis, the substitution model and branch length estimates were allowed to vary independently in each partition. General forms of these models were used since there is a specific recommendation against the use of fixed priors for a and I in the software manual in order to explore more efficiently different values of these parameters. The number of generations was set to 10<sup>6 </sup>with a sampling frequency of 1000 generations in a dual running process with four chains per run <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B72">72</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Majority rule consensus trees were computed after discarding the first 25% of the trees as burn-in, which were saved prior to MCMC convergence. Support for clades given by posterior probabilities was thus represented by the majority rule percentage.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Evolutionary divergence time estimations</p>
</st>
<p>Two major problems preclude a well-defined fossil record for the brown algae: a) almost all brown algae are uncalcified; b) misidentification due to the morphological similarities with some members of the Rhodophyta <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Brown algae are known, however, from Miocene rocks in California and diatomaceous sediments in Central Europe <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B73">73</abbr>
<abbr bid="B74">74</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Some of these can be directly compared to genera of the extant family Sargassaceae, as <it>Cystoseirites </it>(similar to <it>Cystoseira</it>) or <it>Paleohalidrys </it>(which has modern representatives) that are in the order Fucales, and provide a valuable framework for evolutionary parameter estimation and molecular dating of Fucaceae <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>Likelihood ratio tests significantly rejected a strict (uniform) molecular clock for the alignment. Node age estimates were therefore obtained by Bayesian-calibrated phylogenies using an uncorrelated log-normal relaxed clock as suggested for protein-coding genes in a broad variety of species <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B75">75</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Gene-specific gamma-distributed rate heterogeneity among sites and partition into codon position allowed separate estimation of non-synonymous and synonymous sites <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B76">76</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The HKY model of evolution was defined as proposed by Shapiro et al. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B77">77</abbr>
</abbrgrp> for coding regions. Tree priors were fixed on the coalescent, using constant population size and expansion growth, and on Yule speciation models of demographic history. Monophyletic constraints were imposed for the nodes that were used to calibrate the evolutionary rates. Uniform priors were used for the tmrca of the Fucaceae family (Aquitanium to Tortonian age from Miocene epoch: minimum age of 7 Myr; maximum age of 23 Myr; based on <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and previous analyses using 5.8S ribosomal nuclear DNA together with ITS-1 and ITS-2 regions; see Additional file <supplr sid="S6">6</supplr>). Tree priors were used for the tmrca of the Fucus genus. MCMC chains were run in BEAST v1.5.4 for 10<sup>7 </sup>generations, with burn-in and sampling as described above <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B78">78</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Identical sequences or those with genetic distances less than 0.002 were removed prior to the analyses in order to prevent nodes without longitude on the dated reconstruction. Convergence and stationarity of the chains was evaluated by plotting trace files in Tracer v. 1.4 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B78">78</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Phylogenetic trees were represented using R statistical software v2.13.0 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B79">79</abbr>
</abbrgrp> together with "ape v2.5-1" library <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B80">80</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Estimation of ancestral character states and traits associated with lineage diversification</p>
</st>
<p>Methods to estimate the influence of species' traits on lineage diversification have improved with recent advances in the detection of phylogenetic signatures of state-dependent speciation and extinction <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B81">81</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In particular, hypotheses of trait acquisition for a binary character and asymmetry in the direction of trait evolution can now be tested through the formulation of a model <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B81">81</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. For example, mating system is likely to confer unequal probabilities of speciation and extinction. Two states of the character were used for mating system evolution (dioecious <it>vs</it>. hermaphroditic), under one-parameter (MK1) and asymmetrical 2-parameter (MK2) Markov k-state models <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B82">82</abbr>
<abbr bid="B83">83</abbr>
<abbr bid="B84">84</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The binary state speciation and extinction model (BiSSE, <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B84">84</abbr>
</abbrgrp>) was also used to avoid incorrect rejection of irreversible evolution <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B81">81</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>Alternative hypotheses concerning geographic range evolution and diversification (Pacific <it>vs</it>. Atlantic), were also tested using a geographic state speciation and extinction model (GeoSSE; <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B85">85</abbr>
</abbrgrp>). We applied the model to test the relative contributions of speciation, extinction, and dispersal to diversity differences between oceans <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B85">85</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. We also considered different combinations of state-independent and state-dependent diversification, and dispersal (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>).</p>
<p>BiSSE and GeoSSE model assumptions were satisfied through the use of the best rooted tree based on the dated ITS and multi-gene phylogenies: i) rooted phylogenetic tree with branch lengths; ii) contemporaneous terminal taxa and; iii) ultrametric tree <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B81">81</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Characters were binary with known state for each of the terminal taxa. Models were fitted by maximum likelihood nonlinear optimization from a heuristic starting point based on the character-independent birth-death model. Model results were evaluated and compared using the logarithm of the likelihood and the AIC values for the final fitted models. Ancestral character states and the associated uncertainty were also estimated from the scaled likelihood of each character state. Analyses were carried out using the R statistical software <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B79">79</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, with "diversitree v0.7-2" and "ape v2.5-1" packages <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B80">80</abbr>
<abbr bid="B85">85</abbr>
<abbr bid="B86">86</abbr>
<abbr bid="B87">87</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>The dispersal-extinction-cladogenesis (DEC) likelihood model was also implemented to infer geographic ancestry and estimate rates of dispersal and local extinction <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B88">88</abbr>
<abbr bid="B89">89</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Unconstrained and stratified biogeographical models were considered. The latter model stratified the phylogeny into different time slices, reflecting the Bering Strait configuration over time while considering divisions that retained enough phylogenetic events <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B90">90</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Five time slices were chosen that reflect the hypothesized openings of the Bering Strait during the history of Fucaceae: between 13 and 11 Ma, between 7.3 and 6.6 Ma, between 5.5 Ma and 4.0, between 3.6 Ma and 3.2, and between 2.5 and the present day (see Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr> for a detailed time-placement of the recurrent opening events <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
</abbrgrp>). For each time slice, we defined a Q matrix in which transition rates were made dependent on the geographical connectivity between areas (i.e. opening and closing of the Bering Strait). Lagrange analyses were configured using the web application from the same authors (URL: <url>http://www.reelab.net/lagrange/configurator;</url>
<abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B88">88</abbr>
<abbr bid="B89">89</abbr>
</abbrgrp>) and run locally using Lagrange v.20110117 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B89">89</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Results were summarized and plotted using the R statistical software <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B79">79</abbr>
</abbrgrp> with the "ape v2.5-1" package <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B80">80</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Abbreviations</p>
</st>
<p>AIC: Akaike information criteria; BiSSE: Binary state speciation and extinction model; DEC: Dispersal-extinction-cladogenesis model; GeoSSE: Geographic state speciation and extinction model; ITS: Internal Transcribed Spacer; Myr: Million years; Ma: Million years ago; mrca: Most recent common ancestor; SNP: Single nucleotide polymorphism; v: Software version; Kyr: Thousands years; tmrca: Time to the most recent common ancestor.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Authors' contributions</p>
</st>
<p>The study was conceived by GAP and EAS. GAP supervised the project. CFM performed all the laboratory work. FC performed all the phylogenetic analyses. FC, GAP and EAS wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
</sec>
</bdy><bm>
<ack>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Acknowledgements</p>
</st>
<p>Thanks to J. Nylander for the Perl scripts to manipulate MrBayes tree and parameter files. Thanks to R.A. Rohde.We appreciate Ron Blakey's kindness, giving access to excellent paleo-geographic reconstructions along Earth landmass evolution. We are grateful to P. Raimondi, Kyle Walters and Haven Livingston (UC Santa Cruz, USA), G. Zardi, and K. Nicastro (CCMAR) for sample collection; samples of <it>F. radicans </it>were obtained in collaboration with K. Johannesson, L. Kautsky and R. Pereyra (Tj&#228;rn&#246; Marine Laboratory, Sweden). Thanks to three anonymous reviewers and also the editor who improved the manuscript with their comments and suggestions during the revision process. This research was supported by funding from the Portuguese Science Foundation (FCT), NoE Marine Genomics Europe (G.A. Pearson) and the EU project EDEN (E.A. Serr&#227;o). F. C&#225;novas was supported by a post-doctoral fellowship from FCT. Finally, we acknowledge the late Jimmy Hendrix, who's version of "Driving South" provided the inspiration for the title.</p>
</sec>
</ack>
<refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>Genetic Divergence, Reproductive Isolation, and Marine Speciation</p></title><aug><au><snm>Palumbi</snm><fnm>SR</fnm></au></aug><source>Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics</source><pubdate>1994</pubdate><volume>25</volume><fpage>547</fpage><lpage>572</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.002555</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>Phylogeography and historical ecology of the North Atlantic intertidal</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wares</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Cunningham</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Evolution</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>55</volume><fpage>2455</fpage><lpage>2469</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">11831661</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>Evaluating signatures of glacial refugia for North Atlantic benthic marine taxa</p></title><aug><au><snm>Maggs</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Castilho</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Foltz</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Henzler</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Jolly</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Kelly</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Olsen</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Perez</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Stam</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>V&#228;in&#246;l&#228;</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Viard</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Wares</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Ecology</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>89</volume><issue>11 Suppl</issue><fpage>S108</fpage><lpage>22</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">19097488</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>Ecological causes of adaptive radiation</p></title><aug><au><snm>Schluter</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>American Naturalist</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>148</volume><fpage>S40</fpage><lpage>S64</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1086/285901</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>Rapid Speciation and Ecological Divergence in the American Seven-Spined Gobies (Gobiidae, Gobiosomatini) Inferred from a Molecular Phylogeny</p></title><aug><au><snm>R&#252;ber</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Van Tassell</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Zardoya</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Evolution</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>57</volume><issue>7</issue><fpage>1584</fpage><lpage>1598</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">12940363</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>Speciation along a depth gradient in a marine adaptive radiation Speciation along a depth gradient in a marine adaptive radiation</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ingram</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>278</volume><fpage>613</fpage><lpage>618</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1098/rspb.2010.1127</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>Marine radiations at small geographic scales: speciation in neotropical reef gobies (<it>Elacatinus</it>)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Taylor</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Hellberg</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Evolution</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>59</volume><fpage>374</fpage><lpage>385</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">15807422</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B8"><title><p>Evolution in <it>Littorina</it>: ecology matters</p></title><aug><au><snm>Johannesson</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Sea Research</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>49</volume><fpage>107</fpage><lpage>117</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S1385-1101(02)00218-6</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B9"><title><p>Ecological speciation</p></title><aug><au><snm>Rundle</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Nosil</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>Ecology Letters</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>8</volume><fpage>336</fpage><lpage>352</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00715.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>Functional divergence in heat shock response following rapid speciation of <it>Fucus </it>spp. in the Baltic Sea</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lago-Leston</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Mota</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Kautsky</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>Marine Biology</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>157</volume><fpage>683</fpage><lpage>688</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00227-009-1348-1</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>Adaptive traits are maintained on steep selective gradients despite gene flow and hybridization in the intertidal zone</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zardi</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Nicastro</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Canovas</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Ferreira-Costa</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>PloS one</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>Sympatric, parapatric or allopatric: the most important way to classify speciation?</p></title><aug><au><snm>Butlin</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Galindo</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Grahame</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>363</volume><fpage>2997</fpage><lpage>3007</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1098/rstb.2008.0076</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2607313</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18522915</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>Ecological speciation</p></title><aug><au><snm>Schluter</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>Trends in Ecology and Evolution</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>372</fpage><lpage>380</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02198-X</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11403870</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>Marine speciation on a small planet</p></title><aug><au><snm>Palumbi</snm><fnm>SR</fnm></au></aug><source>Trends in Ecology &amp; Evolution</source><pubdate>1992</pubdate><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>114</fpage><lpage>118</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0169-5347(92)90144-Z</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">3237572</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">22194962</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>Plant sex determination and sex chromosomes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Charlesworth</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>Heredity</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>88</volume><fpage>94</fpage><lpage>101</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/sj.hdy.6800016</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11932767</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach</p></title><aug><au><snm>Takebayashi</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Morrell</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>American Journal of Botany</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>88</volume><fpage>1143</fpage><lpage>1150</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.2307/3558325</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11454614</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B17"><title><p>Evidence for an early opening of the Bering Strait</p></title><aug><au><snm>Marincovich</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Gladenkov</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>397</volume><fpage>149</fpage><lpage>151</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/16446</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B18"><title><p>A refined age for the earliest opening of Bering Strait</p></title><aug><au><snm>Gladenkov</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Oleinik</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Marincovich</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Barinov</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Palaeogeology, Palaeoclimatology and Palaeoecology</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>183</volume><fpage>321</fpage><lpage>328</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0031-0182(02)00249-3</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B19"><title><p>The Bering Strait connection: dispersal and speciation in boreal macroalgae</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lindstrom</snm><fnm>SC</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Biogeography</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>28</volume><fpage>243</fpage><lpage>251</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B20"><title><p>Recent history of the Bering Strait</p></title><aug><au><snm>Svitoch</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Taldenkova</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>Oceanology</source><pubdate>1994</pubdate><volume>34</volume><fpage>400</fpage><lpage>404</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B21"><title><p>Arctic climate change and its impacts on the ecology of the North Atlantic</p></title><aug><au><snm>Greene</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Pershing</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Cronin</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Ceci</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au></aug><source>Ecology</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>89</volume><fpage>S24</fpage><lpage>S38</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1890/07-0550.1</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">19097482</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B22"><title><p>Phylogeny and historical ecology of the Desmarestiaceae (Phaeophyceae) support a southern hemisphere origin</p></title><aug><au><snm>Peters</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>van Oppen</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Wiencke</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Stam</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Olsen</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Phycology</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>33</volume><fpage>294</fpage><lpage>309</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.0022-3646.1997.00294.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B23"><title><p>Evolution of the Fucaceae (Phaeophyceae) inferred from nrDNA-ITS</p></title><aug><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Lawrence</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Brawley</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Phycology</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>35</volume><fpage>382</fpage><lpage>394</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1529-8817.1999.3520382.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B24"><title><p>A mtDNA-based phylogeny of the brown algal genus <it>Fucus </it>(Heterokontophyta; Phaeophyta)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Coyer</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Hoarau</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Oudot-Le Secq</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Stam</snm><fnm>WT</fnm></au><au><snm>Olsen</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au></aug><source>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>39</volume><fpage>209</fpage><lpage>222</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.ympev.2006.01.019</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16495086</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B25"><title><p><it>Fucus vesiculosus </it>and <it>spiralis </it>species complex: a nested model of local adaptation at the shore level</p></title><aug><au><snm>Billard</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Destombe</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Valero</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Marine Ecology Progress Series</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>405</volume><fpage>163</fpage><lpage>174</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B26"><title><p>Evolution and diversification within the intertidal brown macroalgae <it>Fucus spiralis/Fucus vesiculosus </it>species complex in the North Atlantic</p></title><aug><au><snm>Coyer</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Hoarau</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Costa</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Hogerdijk</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Billard</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Valero</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Olsen</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>58</volume><fpage>283</fpage><lpage>296</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.ympev.2010.11.015</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21111835</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B27"><title><p>Rapid speciation in a newly opened postglacial marine environment, the Baltic Sea</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pereyra</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Bergstr&#246;m</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Kautsky</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Johannesson</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>BMC Evolutionary Biology</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>9</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2148-9-1</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2653478</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19121213</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B28"><title><p>Genetic isolation between three closely related taxa <it>Fucus vesiculosus, F. spiralis </it>and <it>F. ceranoides</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Billard</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Dauguin</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Engel</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Valero</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Phycology</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>41</volume><fpage>900</fpage><lpage>905</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.0022-3646.2005.04221.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B29"><title><p>Genetic entities and mating system in hermaphroditic <it>Fucus spiralis </it>and its close dioecious relative <it>F. vesiculosus </it>(Fucaceae, Phaeophyceae)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Engel</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Daguin</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>Molecular Ecology</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>14</volume><fpage>2033</fpage><lpage>2046</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02558.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15910325</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B30"><title><p>Implications of mating system for genetic diversity of sister algal species <it>Fucus spiralis and Fucus vesiculosus </it>(Heterokontophyta, Phaeophyceae)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Perrin</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Daguin</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Van De Vliet</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Engel</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>European Journal of Phycology</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>42</volume><fpage>219</fpage><lpage>230</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/09670260701336554</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B31"><title><p>Intriguing asexual life in marginal popu- lations of the brown seaweed <it>Fucus vesiculosus</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Tatarenkov</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Bergstr&#246;m</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>J&#246;nsson</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Kautsky</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Johannesson</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Molecular Ecology</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>14</volume><fpage>647</fpage><lpage>651</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02425.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15660953</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B32"><title><p>Trans-Pacific and trans-Arctic pathways of the intertidal macroalga <it>Fucus distichus </it>L. reveal multiple glacial refugia and colonizations from the North Pacific to the North Atlantic</p></title><aug><au><snm>Coyer</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Hoarau</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Van Schaik</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Luijckx</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Olsen</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Biogeography</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B33"><title><p>Post-Ice age recolonization and differentiation of <it>Fucus serratus </it>L. (Fucaceae: Phaeophyta) populations in Northern Europe</p></title><aug><au><snm>Coyer</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Peters</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Stam</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Olsen</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Molecular Ecology</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>12</volume><fpage>1817</fpage><lpage>1829</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01850.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12803634</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B34"><title><p>Glacial refugia and recolonization pathways in the brown seaweed <it>Fucus serratus</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Hoarau</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Coyer</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Veldsink</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Stam</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Olsen</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Molecular Ecology</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>16</volume><issue>17</issue><fpage>3606</fpage><lpage>3616</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03408.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17845434</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B35"><title><p>Recent versus relic: discerning the genetic signature of <it>Fucus vesiculosus</it>(Heterokontophyta; Phaeophyceae) in the northwestern Atlantic</p></title><aug><au><snm>Muhlin</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Brawley</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Phycology</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>45</volume><fpage>828</fpage><lpage>837</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00715.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B36"><title><p>Surfing the wave on a borrowed board: range expansion and spread of introgressed organellar genomes in the seaweed <it>Fucus ceranoides </it>L</p></title><aug><au><snm>Neiva</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Valero</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>Molecular Ecology</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>19</volume><fpage>4812</fpage><lpage>4822</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04853.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20958817</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B37"><aug><au><snm>Taylor</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Taylor</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Krings</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Paleobotany. The biology and evolution of fossil plants</source><publisher>Elsevier</publisher><pubdate>2009</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B38"><title><p>A multi-locus time-calibrated phylogeny of the brown algae (Heterokonta, Ochrophyta, Phaeophyceae): Investigating the evolutionary nature of the "brown algal crown radiation"</p></title><aug><au><snm>Silberfeld</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Leigh</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Verbruggen</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Cruaud</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>de Reviers</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Rousseau</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><source>Molecular phylogenetics and evolution</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>56</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>659</fpage><lpage>74</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.ympev.2010.04.020</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20412862</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B39"><title><p>Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica</p></title><aug><au><snm>Petit</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Jouzel</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Raynaud</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Barkov</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Barnola</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Basile</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Bender</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Chappellaz</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Davis</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Delaygue</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Delmotte</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Kotlyakov</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Legrand</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Lipenkov</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Lorius</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>P&#233;pin</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Ritz</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Saltzman</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Stievenard</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>399</volume><fpage>429</fpage><lpage>436</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/20859</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B40"><title><p>Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zachos</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Pagani</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Sloan</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Thomas</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Billups</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Science</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>292</volume><fpage>686</fpage><lpage>693</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.1059412</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">11326091</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B41"><title><p>A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic d18O records</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lisiecki</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Raymo</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Maureen</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>Paleoceanography</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>20</volume></bibl><bibl id="B42"><title><p>Alternative global Cretaceous paleogeography</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hay</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Deconto</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Wold</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Wilson</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Voigt</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Schulz</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Wold-Rossby</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Dullo</snm><fnm>WC</fnm></au><au><snm>Ronov</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Balukhovsky</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Soeding</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>The evolution of Cretaceous ocean/climate systems</source><publisher>Geological Society of America Special Paper</publisher><editor>Barrera E, Johnson C</editor><pubdate>1999</pubdate><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>47</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B43"><title><p>Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: a Markov chain Monte Carlo method</p></title><aug><au><snm>Yang</snm><fnm>Z</fnm></au><au><snm>Rannala</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au></aug><source>Molecular Biology and Evolution</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>14</volume><fpage>717</fpage><lpage>724</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9214744</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B44"><title><p>Properties of phylogenetic trees generated by Yule-type speciation models</p></title><aug><au><snm>Steel</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>McKenzie</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Mathematical Bioscience</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>170</volume><fpage>91</fpage><lpage>112</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0025-5564(00)00061-4</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B45"><title><p>GENIE: estimating demographic history from molecular phylogenies</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pybus</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Rambaut</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Bioinformatics</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>18</volume><fpage>1404</fpage><lpage>1405</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/18.10.1404</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12376389</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B46"><title><p>Assigning morphological variants of <it>Fucus </it>(Fucales, Phaeophyceae) in Canadian waters to recognized species using DNA barcoding</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kucera</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Saunders</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>Botany</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>86</volume><fpage>1065</fpage><lpage>1079</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1139/B08-056</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B47"><title><p>Travelling in time with networks: Revealing present day hybridization versus ancestral polymorphism between two species of brown algae, <it>Fucus vesiculosus </it>and <it>F. spiralis</it></p></title><aug><au><snm>Moalic</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Arnaud-Haond</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Perrin</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>BMC Evolutionary Biology</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B48"><title><p>Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences</p></title><aug><au><snm>Charlesworth</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Charlesworth</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au></aug><source>Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics</source><pubdate>1987</pubdate><volume>18</volume><fpage>237</fpage><lpage>268</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.001321</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B49"><title><p>Revisiting synchronous gamete release by fucoid algae in the intertidal zone: fertilization success and beyond? Int Comp Biol 2006, 46: 587-597</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>International Comparative Biology</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>46</volume><fpage>587</fpage><lpage>597</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/icb/icl030</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B50"><title><p>Recent evolution in Baltic <it>Fucus vesiculosus</it>: reduced tolerance to emersion stresses compared to intertidal (North Sea) populations</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Kautsky</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>Marine Ecology Progress Series</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>202</volume><fpage>67</fpage><lpage>79</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B51"><title><p>Analysis of sexual phenotype and prezygotic fertility in natural populations of <it>Fucus spiralis, F. vesiculosus </it>(Fucaceae, Phaeophyceae) and their putative hybrids</p></title><aug><au><snm>Billard</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Engel</snm><fnm>CR</fnm></au><au><snm>Destombe</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Valero</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>European Journal of Phycology</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>397</fpage><lpage>407</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/09670260500334354</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B52"><title><p>Sex chromosomes in flowering plants</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ming</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Moore</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Paterson</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>American Journal of Botany</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>94</volume><fpage>141</fpage><lpage>150</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.3732/ajb.94.2.141</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21642216</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B53"><title><p>Baker's law revisited: reproductive assurance in a metapopulation</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pannell</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Barrett</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Evolution</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>52</volume><fpage>657</fpage><lpage>668</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.2307/2411261</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B54"><aug><au><snm>Stebbins</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>Variation and evolution in plants</source><publisher>New York: Columbia University Press</publisher><pubdate>1950</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B55"><aug><au><snm>Stebbins</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>Flowering plants. Evolution above the species level</source><publisher>Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press</publisher><pubdate>1974</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B56"><title><p>Simple and rapid RNA extraction from freeze-dried tissue of brown algae and seagrasses</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Lago-Leston</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Valente</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Serr&#227;o</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>European Journal of Phycology</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>41</volume><fpage>97</fpage><lpage>104</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/09670260500505011</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B57"><title><p>An Expressed Sequence Tag Analysis of the Intertidal Brown Seaweeds <it>Fucus serratus </it>(L.) and <it>F. vesiculosus </it>(L.) (Heterokontophyta, Phaeophyceae) in Response to Abiotic Stressors</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pearson</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Hoarau</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Lago-leston</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Coyer</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Marine Biotechnology</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>12</volume><fpage>195</fpage><lpage>213</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s10126-009-9208-z</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19609612</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B58"><title><p>Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers</p></title><aug><au><snm>Rozen</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Skaletsky</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Krawetz</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Misener</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Methods in Molecular Biology</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><fpage>365</fpage><lpage>386</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B59"><title><p>Phylogenetic relationships within the Fucales (Phaeophyceae) assessed by the photosystem I coding psaA sequences</p></title><aug><au><snm>Cho</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Rousseau</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>de Reviers</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Boo</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Phycologia</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>45</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>512</fpage><lpage>519</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.2216/05-48.1</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B60"><title><p>Multiple alignment of DNA sequences with MAFFT</p></title><aug><au><snm>Katoh</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Asimenos</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Toh</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Bioinformatics for DNA sequence analysis</source><publisher>New York, USA: Humana Press</publisher><editor>Posada D</editor><pubdate>2009</pubdate><fpage>39</fpage><lpage>64</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B61"><title><p>SeaView and Phylo_win, two graphic tools for sequence alignment and molecular phylogeny</p></title><aug><au><snm>Galtier</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Gouy</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Gautier</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Computer Applications in the Biosciences</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>12</volume><fpage>543</fpage><lpage>548</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">9021275</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B62"><title><p>MrModeltest v2</p></title><aug><au><snm>Nylander</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Xxxx</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B63"><title><p>Dating the human-ape split by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hasegawa</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Kishino</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Yano</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Molecular Evolution</source><pubdate>1985</pubdate><volume>22</volume><fpage>160</fpage><lpage>174</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/BF02101694</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">3934395</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B64"><title><p>A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kimura</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Molecular Evolution</source><pubdate>1980</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>111</fpage><lpage>120</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/BF01731581</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">7463489</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B65"><title><p>Estimation of evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zharkikh</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Molecular Evolution</source><pubdate>1994</pubdate><volume>39</volume><fpage>315</fpage><lpage>329</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/BF00160155</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">7932793</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B66"><title><p>The general stochasstic model of nucletide substitution</p></title><aug><au><snm>Rodriguez</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Oliver</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au><au><snm>Marin</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Medina</snm><fnm>JR</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Theoretical Biology</source><pubdate>1990</pubdate><volume>142</volume><fpage>485</fpage><lpage>501</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80104-3</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">2338834</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B67"><title><p>A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood</p></title><aug><au><snm>Guindon</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Gascuel</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au></aug><source>Systematic Biology</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>52</volume><fpage>696</fpage><lpage>704</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/10635150390235520</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14530136</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B68"><title><p>The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bremer</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Evolution</source><pubdate>1988</pubdate><volume>42</volume><fpage>795</fpage><lpage>803</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.2307/2408870</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B69"><title><p>Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian Drosophilids</p></title><aug><au><snm>Baker</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>DeSalle</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Systematic Biology</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>46</volume><fpage>654</fpage><lpage>673</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/sysbio/46.4.654</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">11975337</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B70"><title><p>Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees</p></title><aug><au><snm>Baker</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Yu</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>DeSalle</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>9</volume><fpage>427</fpage><lpage>436</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/mpev.1998.0519</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9667991</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B71"><title><p>MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ronquist</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Huelsenbeck</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>Bioinformatics</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>19</volume><fpage>1572</fpage><lpage>1574</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12912839</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B72"><title><p>Parallel Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian phylogenetic inference</p></title><aug><au><snm>Altekar</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Dwarkadas</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Huelsenbeck</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Ronquist</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><source>Bioinformatics</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>20</volume><fpage>407</fpage><lpage>415</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btg427</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14960467</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B73"><title><p>Non-calcareous marine algae from California Miocene deposits</p></title><aug><au><snm>Parker</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Dawson</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>Nova Hedwigia</source><pubdate>1965</pubdate><volume>10</volume><fpage>273</fpage><lpage>295</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B74"><title><p>Eine Bl&#228;tter-Flora des Egerien (Ober-Oligoz&#228;n) aus marinen Sedimenten der Zentralen Paratethys im Linzer Raum (&#214;sterreich)</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kovar</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Beitr&#228;ge zur Pal&#228;ontologie von &#214;sterreich</source><pubdate>1982</pubdate><volume>9</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>209</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19387542</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B75"><title><p>The universal distribution of evolutionary rates of genes and distinct characteristics of eukaryotic genes of different apparent ages</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wolf</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Novichkov</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Karev</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Koonin</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Lipman</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of USA</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>106</volume><issue>18</issue><fpage>7273</fpage><lpage>7280</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.0901808106</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B76"><title><p>Evolution of genes and taxa: a primer</p></title><aug><au><snm>Doyle</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Gaut</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au></aug><source>Plant Molecular Biology</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>42</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>23</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1023/A:1006349518932</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10688128</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B77"><title><p>Choosing appropriate substitution models for the phylogenetic analysis of protein-coding sequences</p></title><aug><au><snm>Shapiro</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Rambaut</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Drummond</snm><fnm>AJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Molecular Biology and Evolution</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>23</volume><fpage>7</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16177232</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B78"><title><p>BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees</p></title><aug><au><snm>Drummond</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Rambaut</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>BMC Evolutionary Biology</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>8</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>8</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B79"><aug><au><cnm>R Development Core Team</cnm></au></aug><source>R: A language and environment for statistical computing</source><publisher>Vienna, Austria</publisher><pubdate>2009</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B80"><aug><au><snm>Paradis</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>Analysis of phylogenetics and evolution with R</source><publisher>New York: Springer Science+Business Media</publisher><pubdate>2006</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B81"><title><p>On phylogenetic tests of irreversible evolutionEvo</p></title><aug><au><snm>Goldberg</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Igi&#263;</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au></aug><source>Evolution</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>62</volume><fpage>2727</fpage><lpage>2741</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00505.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">18764918</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B82"><title><p>Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pagel</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B</source><pubdate>1994</pubdate><volume>255</volume><fpage>37</fpage><lpage>45</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1098/rspb.1994.0006</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B83"><title><p>The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pagel</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Systematic Biology</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>48</volume><fpage>612</fpage><lpage>622</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/106351599260184</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B84"><title><p>A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lewis</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>Systematic Biology</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>50</volume><fpage>913</fpage><lpage>925</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/106351501753462876</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">12116640</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B85"><title><p>Phylogenetic inference of reciprocal effects between geographic range evolution and diversification</p></title><aug><au><snm>Goldberg</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Lancaster</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Ree</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Systematic Biology</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>60</volume><fpage>451</fpage><lpage>465</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/sysbio/syr046</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21551125</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B86"><title><p>Estimating a binary character's effect on speciation and extinction</p></title><aug><au><snm>Maddison</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Midford</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Otto</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Systematic Biology</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>56</volume><fpage>701</fpage><lpage>710</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/10635150701607033</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17849325</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B87"><title><p>Estimating trait-dependent speciation and extinction rates from incompletely resolved phylogenies</p></title><aug><au><snm>Fitzjohn</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Maddison</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Otto</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Systematic Biology</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>58</volume><fpage>595</fpage><lpage>611</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/sysbio/syp067</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20525612</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B88"><title><p>A likelihood framework for inferring the evolution of geographic range on phylogenetic trees</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ree</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Moore</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Webb</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Donoghue</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Evolution</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>59</volume><fpage>2299</fpage><lpage>2311</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">16396171</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B89"><title><p>Maximum likelihood inference of geographic range evolution by dispersal, local extinction, and cladogenesis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ree</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Smith</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Systematic Biology</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>57</volume><fpage>4</fpage><lpage>14</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18253896</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B90"><title><p>Prospects and challenges for parametric models in historical biogeographical inference</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ree</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Sanmart&#305;n</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Biogeography</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>36</volume><fpage>1211</fpage><lpage>1220</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.02068.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B91"><aug><au><snm>Gradstein</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Ogg</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Smith</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Geologic time scale 2004</source><publisher>UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><pubdate>2005</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B92"><title><p>Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tamura</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Nei</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Kumar</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of USA</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>101</volume><fpage>11030</fpage><lpage>11035</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.0404206101</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B93"><title><p>MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tamura</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Dudley</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Nei</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Kumar</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Molecular Biology and Evolution</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>24</volume><fpage>1596</fpage><lpage>1599</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/molbev/msm092</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17488738</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B94"><title><p>A reassessment of species boundaries in <it>Cystoseira </it>and <it>Halidrys </it>(Phaeophyceae, Fucales) along the North American West coast</p></title><aug><au><snm>Harvey</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Goff</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Phycology</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>42</volume><fpage>707</fpage><lpage>720</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1529-8817.2006.00215.x</pubid></xrefbib></bibl></refgrp>
</bm></art>