Browsing by Author "Cambridge, Marion L."
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- A comprehensive analysis of mechanical and morphological traits in temperate and tropical seagrass speciesPublication . de los Santos, Carmen B.; Onoda, Yusuke; Vergara, J.J.; Pérez-Lloréns, J. Lucas; Bouma, Tjeerd J.; La Nafie, Yayu A.; Cambridge, Marion L.; Brun, Fernando G.Knowledge of plant mechanical traits is important in understanding how plants resist abiotic and biotic forces and in explaining ecological strategies such as leaf lifespan. To date, these traits have not been systematically evaluated in seagrasses. We analysed mechanical (breaking force and tensile strength) and associated traits (thickness, width, length, fibre content, mass area, and lifespan) of leaves in 22 seagrass species (around one-third of all known seagrass species) to examine (1) the inter-specific variation of these traits in relation to growth form and bioregions, (2) the contribution of morphology to leaf breaking force, (3) how breaking force scales to leaf dimensions, and (4) how mechanical and structural traits correlate to leaf longevity. We also compared our seagrass dataset with terrestrial plant databases to examine similarities between them. Large variation in leaf breaking force was found among seagrass species but, on average, temperate species resisted higher forces than tropical species. Variation in leaf breaking force was largely explained by differences in leaf width rather than thickness, likely due to the benefits in leaf reconfiguration and light interception. Species of large dimensions (long leaves) typically had high leaf breaking force, plausibly to tolerate the drag forces they may experience, which are proportional to the leaf area. Leaves of long-lived species typically had high mass per leaf area and fibre content and they supported high breaking forces. Compared to terrestrial plants, seagrasses are short-lived species with moderately strong fibre-reinforced leaves, which probably evolved to withstand the hydrodynamic forces occurring in the sea, and in response to other environmental factors. Overall, our analysis provides new insights into the physical performance of seagrasses in the marine environment.
- Global analysis of seagrass restoration: the importance of large-scale plantingPublication . van Katwijk, Marieke M.; Thorhaug, Anitra; Marba, Nuria; Orth, Robert J.; Duarte, Carlos M.; Kendrick, Gary A.; Althuizen, Inge H. J.; Balestri, Elena; Bernard, Guillaume; Cambridge, Marion L.; Cunha, Alexandra; Durance, Cynthia; Giesen, Wim; Han, Qiuying; Hosokawa, Shinya; Kiswara, Wawan; Komatsu, Teruhisa; Lardicci, Claudio; Lee, Kun-Seop; Meinesz, Alexandre; Nakaoka, Masahiro; O'Brien, Katherine R.; Paling, Erik I.; Pickerell, Chris; Ransijn, Aryan M. A.; Verduin, Jennifer J.In coastal and estuarine systems, foundation species like seagrasses, mangroves, saltmarshes or corals provide important ecosystem services. Seagrasses are globally declining and their reintroduction has been shown to restore ecosystem functions. However, seagrass restoration is often challenging, given the dynamic and stressful environment that seagrasses often grow in. From our world-wide meta-analysis of seagrass restoration trials (1786 trials), we describe general features and best practice for seagrass restoration. We confirm that removal of threats is important prior to replanting. Reduced water quality (mainly eutrophication), and construction activities led to poorer restoration success than, for instance, dredging, local direct impact and natural causes. Proximity to and recovery of donor beds were positively correlated with trial performance. Planting techniques can influence restoration success. The meta-analysis shows that both trial survival and seagrass population growth rate in trials that survived are positively affected by the number of plants or seeds initially transplanted. This relationship between restoration scale and restoration success was not related to trial characteristics of the initial restoration. The majority of the seagrass restoration trials have been very small, which may explain the low overall trial survival rate (i.e. estimated 37%). Successful regrowth of the foundation seagrass species appears to require crossing a minimum threshold of reintroduced individuals. Our study provides the first global field evidence for the requirement of a critical mass for recovery, which may also hold for other foundation species showing strong positive feedback to a dynamic environment.Synthesis and applications. For effective restoration of seagrass foundation species in its typically dynamic, stressful environment, introduction of large numbers is seen to be beneficial and probably serves two purposes. First, a large-scale planting increases trial survival - large numbers ensure the spread of risks, which is needed to overcome high natural variability. Secondly, a large-scale trial increases population growth rate by enhancing self-sustaining feedback, which is generally found in foundation species in stressful environments such as seagrass beds. Thus, by careful site selection and applying appropriate techniques, spreading of risks and enhancing self-sustaining feedback in concert increase success of seagrass restoration.For effective restoration of seagrass foundation species in its typically dynamic, stressful environment, introduction of large numbers is seen to be beneficial and probably serves two purposes. First, a large-scale planting increases trial survival - large numbers ensure the spread of risks, which is needed to overcome high natural variability. Secondly, a large-scale trial increases population growth rate by enhancing self-sustaining feedback, which is generally found in foundation species in stressful environments such as seagrass beds. Thus, by careful site selection and applying appropriate techniques, spreading of risks and enhancing self-sustaining feedback in concert increase success of seagrass restoration.
- Leaf-fracture properties correlated with nutritional traits in nine Australian seagrass species: implications for susceptibility to herbivoryPublication . de los Santos, Carmen B.; Brun, F. G.; Onoda, Yusuke; Cambridge, Marion L.; Bouma, Tjeerd J.; Vergara, Juan J.Seagrasses are exposed to the constant risk of structural damage due to abiotic factors, such as waves and currents, and biotic factors, e.g. herbivory. Leaf mechanical resistance is therefore essential in protecting plants from structural failure and may also have ecological consequences. For example, mechanical traits of seagrass leaves may play an important role in plant− herbivore interactions and food-preferences of herbivores in these ecosystems, as widely reported for terrestrial plants. However, little is known about leaf mechanical resistance against structural damage in seagrasses and how it varies with other traits such as their nutritional value. We analysed the correlation between fracture properties relevant to herbivory and the nutritional value of seagrass leaves, testing the general assumption that species that invest heavily in mechanical resistance (toughening of the leaves) will present low nitrogen and high carbon and fibre contents. Direct measurements of leaf traits were conducted on 9 seagrass species from south-western Australia: (1) leaf-fracture properties from shearing and tearing tests, (2) nutritional values (carbon to nitrogen ratio and fibre content) and (3) morphological and structural traits (specific leaf area and leaf thickness). Results showed that leaf-fracture properties in seagrasses were tightly correlated to their C:N ratio, which reflects their nutritional value, thus supporting the general assumption that C investment is inversely correlated to N content. This close correlation suggested that patterns of seagrass consumption may be influenced not only by the C:N ratio but also by the leaf-fracture properties. Among co-existing seagrasses, we found a continuous spectrum of mechanical and nutritional traits across species, which provides fundamental information about species assembly, herbivore behaviour and ecosystem functions.