Repository logo

Browsing by Author "Gomes, Pedro"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Designing a coastal monitoring marine biodiversity survey, using trammel nets and gillnets in Portugal
    Publication . Rufino, Marta M.; Maia, Catarina; Dinis, David; Farias, Inês; Moura, Teresa; Gomes, Pedro; Quaresma, Ivania; Martins, Rogélia; Figueiredo, Ivone; Serra-Pereira, Bárbara; Gaspar, Miguel; Moreno, Ana
    Although coastal areas are of great importance, they often lack long term monitoring surveys, which are essential for effective management, fisheries sustainability, and marine spatial planning. To address this, we conducted two experimental surveys aimed at assessing communities and their biodiversity, with the objective of designing a monitoring program for marine coastal biodiversity, based on gear type, depth, sampling arrangement, total net length, and panel position within the haul. Depth was found to be the most important factor shaping biodiversity, while gear type had the greatest impact on assessing species richness. Overall, both number of species and diversity increased with depth, though significant differences were only found between hauls deployed at 10 m and deeper (30-50 m). Trammel nets caught a larger number of species compared to gillnets, and there was evidence of an interaction between depth and gear, in terms of abundance and at the community level; samples taken deeper than 10 m showed more gear-related differences. We found that neither the panel position within the haul nor the number of nets had any impact on species diversity or abundance. Similarly, there was no evidence for an effect related to the arrangement of nets, as results were consistent whether using separated or continuous net panels. However, the number of nets used as a sampling unit significantly influenced the results, as the variation in species abundance and diversity with depth and gear type was similar, when 20 or 30 nets were used, but became more variable when only 10 nets were used, even with increased replication. We concluded that both trammel nets and gillnets should be included in a coastal biodiversity monitoring program, as each catches a different set of species, including both demersal and pelagic taxa. Further, we recommend using a minimum of 20 nets (ideally 30+) per station, with replication. The evaluated monitoring system has a minimal impact on the ecosystem, can be easily deployed using commercial vessels and effectively captures a large number of species, being thus, highly recommended to be used in coastal monitoring surveys.
    2025-01Journal article Open access Show more
  • MAMMALS in Portugal: A data set of terrestrial, volant, and marine mammal occurrences in Portugal
    Publication . Grilo, Clara; Afonso, Beatriz C.; Afonso, Filipe; Alexandre, Marta; Aliácar, Sara; Almeida, Ana; Alonso, Ivan Prego; Álvares, Francisco; Alves, Paulo; Alves, Paulo Célio; Alves, Pedro; Duarte, Beatriz; Duro, Virginia; Encarnação, Cláudia; Eufrázio, Sofia; Fael, António; Falé, João Salvador; Faria, Sandra; Fernandes, Carlos; Fernandes, Margarida; Lopes, Susana; Rosalino, Luís Miguel; Costa, Gonçalo Ferrão; Ferreira, Clara; Ferreira, Diogo F.; Ferreira, Eduardo; Ferreira, Joaquim Pedro; Ferreira, João; Ferreira, Diana; Fonseca, Carlos; Fontes, Inês; Fragoso, Ricardo; Rosário, Inês T.; López‐Baucells, Adrià; Franco, Claudia; Freitas, Tamira; Gabriel, Sofia I.; Gibb, Rory; Gil, Patricia; Gomes, Carla Patricia Jorge; Horta, Pedro; Gomes, Pedro; Gomes, Verónica; Rossa, Mariana; Grilo, Filipa; Amado, Anabela; Guedes, Américo; Guilherme, Filipa; Gutiérrez, Iván; Harper, Henry; Herrera, José M.; Hipólito, Dário; Infante, Samuel; Jesus, José; Russo, Danilo; Loureiro, Armando; Loureiro, Filipa; Lourenço, Rui; Lourenço, Sofia; Lucas, Paula; Magalhães, Ana; Maldonado, Cristina; Marcolin, Fabio; Marques, Sara; Marques, J. Tiago; Sá, Pedro; Amendoeira, Vitor; Marques, Carina; Marques, Paulo; Marrecas, Pedro Caetano; Martins, Frederico; Martins, Raquel; Mascarenhas, Miguel; Mata, Vanessa A.; Mateus, Ana Rita; Matos, Milene; Sabino‐Marques, Helena; Medinas, Denis; Amorim, Francisco; Mendes, Tiago; Mendes, Gabriel; Mestre, Frederico; Milhinhas, Catarina; Mira, António; Monarca, Rita I.; Monteiro, Norberto; Monteiro, Barbara; Salgueiro, Vânia; Monterroso, Pedro; Nakamura, Mónia; Silva Aparício, Guilherme; Negrões, Nuno; Nóbrega, Eva K.; Nóvoa, Miguel; Nunes, Manuel; Nunes, Nuno Jardim; Oliveira, Flávio; Oliveira, José Miguel; Santos, Helena; Palmeirim, Jorge M.; Pargana, João; Paula, Anabela; Araújo, Ricardo; Paupério, Joana; Pedroso, Nuno M.; Pereira, Guilherme; Pereira, Pedro F.; Pereira, José; Pereira, Maria João Ramos; Santos, Joana; Petrucci‐Fonseca, Francisco; Pimenta, Miguel; Pinto, Sara; Pinto, Nuno; Ascensão, Fernando; Pires, Rosa; Pita, Ricardo; Pontes, Carlos; Quaresma, Marisa; Queirós, João; Barbosa, A. Márcia; Queirós, Luís; Rainho, Ana; Graça Ramalhinho, Maria; Ramalho, Patrícia; Raposeira, Helena; Augusto, Margarida; Rasteiro, Francisco; Rebelo, Hugo; Regala, Frederico Tátá; Reto, Dyana; Jones, Kate E.; Ribeiro, Sérgio Bruno; Rio‐Maior, Helena; Rocha, Ricardo; Rocha, Rita Gomes; Rodrigues, Luísa; Román, Jacinto; Bandeira, Victor; Roque, Sara; Santos, João P. V.; Santos, Nuno; Santos, Sara; Santos, Carlos Pedro; Santos‐Reis, Margarida; Serronha, Ana; Sierra, Pablo; Silva, Bruno; Silva, Carla S. G. M.; Silva, Clara; Laborde, Marina I.; Barbosa, Soraia; Silva, Diogo; Silva, Luís P.; Silva, Ricardo; Silva, Carmen; Silva Júnior, Flavio Manoel Rodrigues; Sousa, Pedro; Sousa‐Guedes, Diana; Spadoni, Giulia; Tapisso, Joaquim T.; Oliveira, Luís Lamas; Teixeira, Daniela; Barbosa, Sérgio; Teixeira, Sérgio; Teixeira, Nuno; Torres, Rita T.; Travassos, Paulo; Vale‐Gonçalves, Hélia; Cidraes‐Vieira, Nuno; Merten, Sophie; Luz Mathias, Maria; Leitão, Inês; Barreiro, Silvia; Barros, Paulo; Barros, Tânia; Barros, Filomena; Basto, Mafalda; Bernardino, Joana; Bicho, Sara; Biedma, Luis Eduardo; Borges, Marta; Braz, Luis; Lemos, Rita; Brito, José Carlos; Brito, Tiago; Cabral, João Alexandre; Calzada, Javier; Camarinha, Cláudia; Carapuço, Mafalda; Cardoso, Paulo; Carmo, Mário; Carrapato, Carlos; Silva Carrilho, Maílis; Lima, Cátia; Carvalho, Diogo Filipe T. C. S.; Carvalho, Filipe; Carvalho, João; Castro, Diana; Castro, Guilherme; Castro, Joana; Castro, Luis Roma; Catry, Filipe Xavier; Cerveira, Ana M.; Cid, André; Linck, Paloma; Clarke, Rafael; Conde, Conceição; Conde, José; Costa, Jorge; Costa, Mafalda; Costa, Pedro; Costa, Cristina; Couto, André Pedro; Craveiro, João; Dias, Marta; Lopes, Hugo; Dias, Sofia
    Mammals are threatened worldwide, with 26% of all species being includedin the IUCN threatened categories. This overall pattern is primarily associatedwith habitat loss or degradation, and human persecution for terrestrial mam-mals, and pollution, open net fishing, climate change, and prey depletion formarine mammals. Mammals play a key role in maintaining ecosystems func-tionality and resilience, and therefore information on their distribution is cru-cial to delineate and support conservation actions. MAMMALS INPORTUGAL is a publicly available data set compiling unpublishedgeoreferenced occurrence records of 92 terrestrial, volant, and marine mam-mals in mainland Portugal and archipelagos of the Azores and Madeira thatincludes 105,026 data entries between 1873 and 2021 (72% of the data occur-ring in 2000 and 2021). The methods used to collect the data were: live obser-vations/captures (43%), sign surveys (35%), camera trapping (16%),bioacoustics surveys (4%) and radiotracking, and inquiries that represent lessthan 1% of the records. The data set includes 13 types of records: (1) burrowsjsoil moundsjtunnel, (2) capture, (3) colony, (4) dead animaljhairjskullsjjaws, (5) genetic confirmation, (6) inquiries, (7) observation of live animal (8),observation in shelters, (9) photo trappingjvideo, (10) predators dietjpelletsjpine cones/nuts, (11) scatjtrackjditch, (12) telemetry and (13) vocalizationjecholocation. The spatial uncertainty of most records ranges between 0 and100 m (76%). Rodentia (n=31,573) has the highest number of records followedby Chiroptera (n=18,857), Carnivora (n=18,594), Lagomorpha (n=17,496),Cetartiodactyla (n=11,568) and Eulipotyphla (n=7008). The data setincludes records of species classified by the IUCN as threatened(e.g.,Oryctolagus cuniculus[n=12,159],Monachus monachus[n=1,512],andLynx pardinus[n=197]). We believe that this data set may stimulate thepublication of other European countries data sets that would certainly contrib-ute to ecology and conservation-related research, and therefore assisting onthe development of more accurate and tailored conservation managementstrategies for each species. There are no copyright restrictions; please cite this data paper when the data are used in publications.
    2022Journal article Open access Show more
  • Research and management priorities for Atlantic marine recreational fisheries in Southern Europe
    Publication . Pita, Pablo; Artetxe, Inaqui; Diogo, Hugo; Gomes, Pedro; Gordoa, Ana; Hyder, Kieran; Pereira, Joao; Pita, Cristina; Rangel, Mafalda; Garcia-Rodrigues, Joao; Sague, Oscar; Veiga, Pedro; Vingada, Jose; Villasante, Sebastian
    Marine Recreational Fishing (MRF) is an important activity in Europe, with 9 million fishers and generating annually 6 billion in direct expenditures. However, there is a lack of data and understanding of MRF in Europe, particularly in Southern countries, which prevents a number of fish stocks from being effectively assessed and managed. In November 2016, a participatory workshop on MRF was held in Vigo (Spain) to identify challenges and opportunities for data collection, and to diagnose key research gaps and management issues for MRF in the Southern European Atlantic. Experts from a wide range of disciplines (researchers, policy makers, fisheries managers and commercial and recreational fishers) highlighted that the management of MRF is a challenge due to complex and dispersed legal frameworks, with multiple administrations involved, and overlapping uses of space with commercial fishing, aquaculture, navigation and tourism, among others. The lack of strong and representative fishing associations hampers research and management initiatives. Effective communication between recreational fishers, researchers and fisheries managers is also lacking. Despite the ecological, social and economic relevance of MRF, there is no systematic and comprehensive collection of information on fishing effort, recreational catches, expenses, social profile and access conditions of European recreational fishers. These data would be useful to avoid biases in the assessment of recreational fisheries due to the great diversity of ecosystems, species and typologies of users. Strategic recommendations and research priorities were also identified to address knowledge gaps and are discussed in the context of the management of MRF across Europe.
    2017-12Journal article Restricted access Show more