Browsing by Author "Jaffuel, Geoffrey"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Combined field inoculations of pseudomonas bacteria, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and entomopathogenic nematodes and their effects on wheat performancePublication . Imperiali, Nicola; Chiriboga, Xavier; Schlaeppi, Klaus; Fesselet, Marie; Villacres, Daniela; Jaffuel, Geoffrey; Bender, S. Franz; Dennert, Francesca; Blanco-Perez, Ruben; van der Heijden, Marcel G. A.; Maurhofer, Monika; Mascher, Fabio; Turlings, Ted C. J.; Keel, Christoph J.; Campos-Herrera, RaquelIn agricultural ecosystems, pest insects, pathogens, and reduced soil fertility pose major challenges to crop productivity and are responsible for significant yield losses worldwide. Management of belowground pests and diseases remains particularly challenging due to the complex nature of the soil and the limited reach of conventional agrochemicals. Boosting the presence of beneficial rhizosphere organisms is a potentially sustainable alternative and may help to optimize crop health and productivity. Field application of single beneficial soil organisms has shown satisfactory results under optimal conditions. This might be further enhanced by combining multiple beneficial soil organisms, but this remains poorly investigated. Here, we inoculated wheat plots with combinations of three beneficial soil organisms that have different rhizosphere functions and studied their effects on crop performance. Plant beneficial Pseudomonas bacteria, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), and entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN), were inoculated individually or in combinations at seeding, and their effects on plant performance were evaluated throughout the season. We used traditional and molecular identification tools to monitor their persistence over the cropping season in augmented and control treatments, and to estimate the possible displacement of native populations. In three separate trials, beneficial soil organisms were successfully introduced into the native populations and readily survived the field conditions. Various Pseudornonas, mycorrhiza, and nematode treatments improved plant health and productivity, while their combinations provided no significant additive or synergistic benefits compared to when applied alone. EPN application temporarily displaced some of the native EPN, but had no significant long-term effect on the associated food web. The strongest positive effect on wheat survival was observed for Pseudomonas and AMF during a season with heavy natural infestation by the frit fly, Oscinella frit, a major pest of cereals. Hence, beneficial impacts differed between the beneficial soil organisms and were most evident for plants under biotic stress. Overall, our findings indicate that in wheat production under the test conditions the three beneficial soil organisms can establish nicely and are compatible, but their combined application provides no additional benefits. Further studies are required, also in other cropping systems, to fine-tune the functional interactions among beneficial soil organisms, crops, and the environment.
- Effects of cover crops on the overwintering success of entomopathogenic nematodes and their antagonistsPublication . Jaffuel, Geoffrey; Blanco-Pérez, Rubén; Büchi, Lucie; Mäder, Paul; Fließbach, Andreas; Charles, Raphaël; Degen, Thomas; Turlings, Ted C.J.; Campos-Herrera, RaquelConservation agriculture is arising as an alternative to conventional agriculture with the aim to have a reduced impact on the environment. This includes the use of cover crops to conserve soil quality by limiting soil erosion, adding organic matter, and enhancing soil nutrient content, as well as water availability, which are all factors that can greatly influence the presence of soil organisms. In the current study, we investigated whether winter cover crops can enhance the persistence of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) over the winter season. In a first trial we augmented EPN populations in plots without (bared) and with the cover crops, pea (Pisum sativum) or mustard (Brassica juncea). In late autumn, individual mini-plots in each of the three treatments were supplemented with infective juveniles (IJs) of either Heterorhabditis bacteriophora or Steinernema feltiae. In a second trial we studied naturally occurring EPN in plots without (bared) and with the cover crop pea (Pisum sativum) followed by planting of winter wheat. To identify and quantify EPN, we analyzed soil samples using quantitative real time PCR (qPCR) at three time points over the winter season. We also measured the activity of augmented EPN by baiting the soil with wax moth larvae, Galleria mellonella. In addition, we used the qPCR method to investigate the presence of nematophagous fungi (NF), free-living nematodes (FLN) and ectoparasitic bacteria, all of which can interfere with EPN performance. Numbers of naturally occurring EPN in the investigated fields were very low (< 1 EPN per 100 g of soil). The cover crops only had a significant positive effect on the numbers of augmented S. feltiae found in early winter. No striking effect was found for H. bacteriophora. Yet, augmentation was found to enhance the insect-suppressiveness of the soil, as the recorded EPN infectivity after the winter was slightly higher than what was observed in autumn, one month after application. The numbers of FLN, which compete for insect cadavers, was higher in spring than in early winter. These FLN and other antagonists may be important in reducing EPN numbers. In conclusion, the effect of cover crops on EPN persistence was only evident during early-winter and was only significant in the plots augmented with S. feltiae. Moreover, we found that higher numbers of EPN in agricultural soils do not necessarily translate into high infectivity, which is the key factor determining their effectiveness in controlling soil pests.
- Prevalence and activity of entomopathogenic nematodes and their antagonists in soils that are subject to different agricultural practicesPublication . Jaffuel, Geoffrey; Mader, Paul; Blanco-Perez, Ruben; Chiriboga, Xavier; Fliessbach, Andreas; Turlings, Ted C. J.; Campos-Herrera, RaquelAgricultural management practices can modify soil properties in ways that may disrupt the abundance and activity of beneficial organisms in the soil. We assessed the impact of different soil management practices on entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN), which have great potential as biological control agents against root-feeding insects. Soils were sampled during spring and autumn 2013 in all 96 plots of a long-term Swiss field trial (DOK experiment). By combining a traditional insect-baiting technique and real-time qPCR analyses, we identified and quantified over 20 soil-dwelling species (or genera). This allowed us to investigate how communities of natural EPN populations and their associated natural enemies and competitors are affected by (i) three crop types (wheat, maize and grass-clover ley) and (ii) farming systems, i.e. conventional, organic and biodynamic, which differed in fertilization, and pesticide use. We also determined the effects on soils' microbial biomass in terms of carbon (C-mic) and nitrogen (N-mic) and applied spatial distribution analysis (SADIE) to uncover patterns of aggregations and associations of the study organisms. Although manure based farming systems increased microbial biomass, the systems did not influence the presence of EPN or their antagonists. EPN was more abundant in winter-wheat plots than in maize and grass-clover ley plots. Overall, very low numbers of EPN were recorded, implying that their natural presence would not be sufficient to have a satisfactory suppressive effect on root-feeding pests and the application of EPN would therefore be an appropriate measure to protect yields in case of root pest outbreaks. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.