Browsing by Author "Andrade, R. L."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Evaluation of comfort level in desks equipped with two personalized ventilation systems in slightly warm environmentsPublication . Conceição, E. Z. E.; Lucio, M. M. J. R.; Rosa, S. P.; Custodio, A. L. V.; Andrade, R. L.; Meira, M. J. P. A.In this work the comfort level, namely the thermal comfort, local thermal discomfort and air quality levels, in a classroom with desks equipped with two personalized ventilation systems, in slightly warm environments, is evaluated. A manikin, a ventilated classroom desk, two indoor climate analyzers, a multi-nodal human thermal comfort numerical model and a computational fluid dynamic numerical model, are used. The classroom desk, with double occupation capacity, is used by a student, located in the right side seat. Each personalized ventilation system is equipped with one air terminal device located above the desk writing area, in front to the trunk area, and an other located below the desk writing area, in front to the legs area. The thermal comfort level is evaluated by the developed multi-nodal human thermal comfort numerical model, using a PMV value, the local thermal discomfort level, namely the draught risk and the air velocity fluctuation equivalent frequencies, is evaluated by empirical models. while the air quality level and the detailed airflow around the manikin are evaluated by the computational fluid dynamic numerical model. In the experimental tests the mean air velocity and the turbulence intensity in the upper air terminal device are 3.5 m/s and 9.7%, while in the lower air terminal device are 2.6 m/s and 15.2%. The mean air temperature in the air terminal devices is around 28 degrees C, while the mean radiant temperature in the occupation area, the mean air temperature far from the occupation area and the internal mean air relative humidity were. respectively, 28 degrees C, 28 degrees C and 50%. The air velocity and temperature around the occupant are measured around 15 human body sections. The actual personalized ventilation system, which promotes an ascendant airflow around the occupant with highest air renovation rate in the respiration area, promotes acceptable thermal comfort conditions and air quality in the respiration area in accord to the present standards. The draught risk is verified in the head and left leg and the uncomfortable air velocity equivalent frequency is verified in the left arm. The left human body sections present higher local thermal discomfort levels than the right human body sections, because they are also influenced by the left air terminal device. In accord to the obtained results, the classroom desk design, equipped with two personalized ventilation systems, guarantees acceptable thermal comfort conditions and promotes good air quality conditions, with acceptable local thermal discomfort conditions and with low energy consumption level. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
- Study of Airflow around Occupants Seated in Desks Equipped with Upper and Lower Air Terminal Devices for Slightly Warm EnvironmentsPublication . Conceição, E. Z. E.; Rosa, S. P.; Custodio, A. L. V.; Andrade, R. L.; Meira, M. J. P. A.; Lucio, M. M. J. R.This paper will discuss' the study of turbulent and mean airflow exiting air terminal devices and surrounding occupants sewed in classroom desks for slightly warm environments equipped with personalized ventilation systems with upper and lower air terminal devices. In the turbulent airflow analysis the air root mean square. the air turbulence intensity, and the air velocity fluctuations,frequencies are calculated, while in the mean airflow analysis the mean air velocity and temperature, the human body skin temperature, and the thermal comfort indexes are evaluated using a multi-node thermal regulation model for two different airflow rates. In the experimental tests made in a wood chamber a manikin, a ventilated desk, and two interior climate analyzers are used. The fluctuations of air velocity and temperature are measured in the air terminal devices and in 15 human body sections around the manikin, while the mean value of air relative humidity and mean radiant temperature are evaluated inside the experimental chamber. The mean air temperature in the air terminal devices is around 28 degrees C (82.4 degrees F), while the mean radiant temperature in the occupation area, the mean air temperature far from the occupation area, and the internal mean air relative humidity in the occupation area are around 28 degrees C (82.4 degrees F), 28 degrees C (82.4 degrees F), and 50%, respectively. The airflow rate in tests I and II are 25.75 m(3)/h (15.16 ft(3)/min) and 48.04 m(3)/h (28.27 ft(3)/min), respectively. The mean air velocity, root mean square, and turbulence intensity for test I are 0.59 m/s (1.94 ft/s), 0.13 m/s (0.43 ft/s), and 22.4%, in the upper air terminal device, and 0.9 m/s (2.96 ft/s), 0.15 m/s (0.49 ft/s), and 16.7%, in the lower air terminal device; while, for test II they are 1.72 m/s (5.64 ft/s), 0.16 m/s (0.52 ft/s), and 9.4%, in the upper air terminal device, and 1.06 m/s (3.48 ft/s), 0.16 m/s (0.52 ft/s and 14.9%, in the lower air terminal device. In test I the mean air velocity and the airflow rate are higher in the lower exit air terminal device than in the upper exit air terminal device; while in test II, the opposite is true. It is also true that the skin temperature is slightly lower in test II than in test I, mainly in human body sections near the air terminal devices, such as the chest, arms, and legs. The occupant in test I conditions is thermally uncomfortable; however, in test II conditions, the obtained results are near the comfort recommendations.