Browsing by Author "Mansinho, A."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Asymmetric PCR ELISA: increased sensitivity and reduced costs for the detection of plant virusesPublication . Nolasco, Gustavo; Sequeira, Z.; Soares, C.; Mansinho, A.; Bailey, A. M.; Niblett, C. l.PCR ELISA is the immunodetection of the products of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR). It is effective for detecting and differentiating plant viral nucleic acids, but as currently performed, it is laborious and expensive. The procedure has been modified and simplified by using asymmetric PCR. This eliminated the need to denature and neutralize samples prior to hybridization. It also increased the relative concentration of the target DNA species, making PCR ELISA more sensitive than TaqMan(TM), a fluorescence-based detection method. Reducing the reaction volumes to half and the concentration of the dNTPs and the digoxigenin label by tenfold significantly reduced the costs of PCR ELISA without reducing its sensitivity. The usefulness of these modifications was demonstrated for the detection of Citrus tristeza virus and Rupestris stem pitting-associated virus. We expect that with only minor modifications asymmetric PCR ELISA could be used effectively for the detection of most nucleic acid molecules of interest.
- Large scale evaluation of primers for diagnosis of rupestris stem pitting associated virus-1Publication . Nolasco, Gustavo; Mansinho, A.; Santos, M. T.; Soares, C.; Sequeira, Z.; Sequeira, C.; Correia, P. K.; Sequeira, O. A.The unavailability of adequate immunological reagents has prevented the use of ELISA for the diagnosis of rupestris stem pitting disorder of grapevines. In this work, the performance of five primer pairs for broad-scale detection of rupestris stem pitting associated virus-1 by RT-PCR using ds-RNA templates was compared and contrasted with biological indexing. The virus was widespread among the budwood of 35 Portuguese grapevine varieties assayed, with a prevalence of 85%. The biological assay proved to be unreliable as an index of infection due to the high number of false negatives. Five sets of primers were assayed and compared by means of their relative sensitivity and negative predictive value. The primer pair specific for the coat protein gene was excluded because of the difficulty in identifying the specific amplified product. From the other four primer pairs, those specific for the helicase domain of the putative polymerase gene had the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value. However, a high confidence in the assay, as desirable for a certification scheme, could not be obtained by the sole use of this primer pair. An additional pair should be used in a separate or in a multiplex RT-PCR reaction.