Publicação
Snakes and ladders: a technological approach to tool maintenance byproducts using module flake categories
| dc.contributor.author | Cabrita Nora, David André | |
| dc.contributor.author | Malinsky-Buller, Ariel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gasparyan, Boris | |
| dc.contributor.author | Petrosyan, Artur | |
| dc.contributor.author | Frahm, Ellery | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-07T12:45:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-07T12:45:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-11-24 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The study of retouching, reshaping, and rejuvenation in lithic technology has traditionally focused on finished tools, overlooking the byproducts of these processes, particularly microdebitage. This emphasis has led to an incomplete understanding of the dynamic behaviours associated with tool maintenance and a lack of crucial information about prehistoric technological strategies. In this study, we address this knowledge gap. Specifically, we introduce a classification system for lithic byproducts resulting from retouching, reshaping, and rejuvenation techniques, categorising them into five modules (M0 through M4) based on lithic technological analysis. This methodology integrates the chaîne opératoire approach to analyse flakes without size thresholds. To demonstrate our approach, we apply it to lithic assemblages from two Middle Palaeolithic sites in Armenia, Kalavan 2 and Ararat-1 Cave. This enables a precise reconstruction of tool use-life and, in turn, the maintenance strategies of Pleistocene hunter-gatherers. Our findings demonstrate that microdebitage (byproducts) can contribute to a holistic view of decision-making, revealing patterns in tool maintenance and raw material provisioning. The module system provides insights on ‘ghost tools’ i., e., tools that are no longer present in the archaeological record, as well as curation behaviours and economic decisions regarding raw materials that were previously difficult to discern. By shifting the focus from finished artefacts to byproducts, this framework enhances our ability to interpret lithic assemblages and understand the adaptive strategies of prehistoric hunter-gatherers. | eng |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10816-025-09754-0 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1573-7764 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1072-5369 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/28063 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.peerreviewed | yes | |
| dc.publisher | Springer | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | Lithic technology | |
| dc.subject | Tool maintenance | |
| dc.subject | Curation | |
| dc.subject | Microdebitage | |
| dc.subject | Module flakes | |
| dc.subject | Technological organisation | |
| dc.title | Snakes and ladders: a technological approach to tool maintenance byproducts using module flake categories | eng |
| dc.type | journal article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| oaire.citation.issue | 2 | |
| oaire.citation.title | Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory | |
| oaire.citation.volume | 33 | |
| oaire.version | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |
| person.familyName | Cabrita Nora | |
| person.givenName | David André | |
| person.identifier.ciencia-id | 4217-F466-BC40 | |
| person.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-2948-776X | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 797eae80-78a6-41fe-af1b-5a97a8ad6ae0 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 797eae80-78a6-41fe-af1b-5a97a8ad6ae0 |