Repository logo
 
Publication

Relative contribution of rice and fish consumption to bioaccessibility-corrected health risks for urban residents in eastern China

dc.contributor.authorWang, Wenqin
dc.contributor.authorGong, Yu
dc.contributor.authorGreenfield, Ben K.
dc.contributor.authorNunes, Luís
dc.contributor.authorYang, Qianqi
dc.contributor.authorLei, Pei
dc.contributor.authorBu, Wenbo
dc.contributor.authorWang, Bin
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Xiaomiao
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Lei
dc.contributor.authorZhong, Huan
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-02T15:57:26Z
dc.date.available2021-09-02T15:57:26Z
dc.date.issued2021-10
dc.description.abstractThere are global concerns about dietary exposure to metal(loid)s in foods. However, little is known about the relative contribution of rice versus fish to multiple metal(loid) exposure for the general population, especially in Asia where rice and fish are major food sources. We compared relative contributions of rice and fish consumption to multi-metal(loid) exposure on the city-scale (Nanjing) and province-scale in China. The effects of ingestion rate, metal(loid) level, and bioaccessibility were examined to calculate modeled risk from Cu, Zn, total As (TAs), inorganic As (iAs), Se, Cd, Pb, and methylmercury (MeHg). Metal(loid) levels in rice and fish samples collected from Nanjing City were generally low, except iAs. Metal(loid) bioaccessibilities in fish were higher than those in rice, except Se. Calculated carcinogenic risks induced by iAs intake (indicated by increased lifetime cancer risk, ILCR) were above the acceptable level (1 0 − 4) in Nanjing City (median: 3 × 10− 4 for female and 4 × 10− 4 for male) and nine provinces (1.4 × 10− 4 to 5.9 × 10− 4) in China. Rice consumption accounted for 85.0% to 99.8% of carcinogenic risk. The non-carcinogenic hazard quotients (HQ) for single metals and hazard index (HI) for multi-metal exposure were < 1 in all cases, indicating of their slight non-carcinogen health effects associated. In Guangdong and Jiangsu provinces, results showed that rice and fish intake contributed similarly to the HI (i.e., 42.6% vs 57.4% in Guangdong and 54.6% vs 45.4% in Jiangsu). Sensitivity analysis indicated that carcinogenic risk was most sensitive to rice ingestion rate and rice iAs levels, while non-carcinogenic hazard (i.e., HQ and HI) was most sensitive to ingestion rate of fish and rice, and Cu concentration in rice. Our results suggest that rice is more important than fish for human dietary metal(loid) exposure risk in China, and carcinogenic risk from iAs exposure in rice requires particular attention.pt_PT
dc.description.sponsorship2020YFC1807502, 21637002, U2032201, 41822709, BK20200322, CSC201806190209pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.envint.2021.106682pt_PT
dc.identifier.eissn1873-6750
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/16929
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectMetalpt_PT
dc.subjectBioavailabilitypt_PT
dc.subjectFishpt_PT
dc.subjectRicept_PT
dc.subjectRisk Assessmentpt_PT
dc.subjectDietary Exposurept_PT
dc.titleRelative contribution of rice and fish consumption to bioaccessibility-corrected health risks for urban residents in eastern Chinapt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.startPage106682pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleEnvironment Internationalpt_PT
oaire.citation.volume155pt_PT
person.familyNameNunes
person.givenNameLuís
person.identifier93800
person.identifier.ciencia-id3112-1FCD-6685
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5606-970X
person.identifier.ridM-4647-2013
person.identifier.scopus-author-id7102529511
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd32d0ac6-6cb6-4f03-afcf-3c80978d469f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd32d0ac6-6cb6-4f03-afcf-3c80978d469f

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Relative contribution of rice and fish consumption.pdf
Size:
1.69 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format