| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.4 MB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
A set of acoustic and optical turbidity sensors was tested and compared in laboratory conditions under
suspended sediment concentrations of the range 0.1-10 g/l. Various well sorted, mixed, as well as natural
sediments (including clay, mud and sand) were used to cover a wide range of conditions, with emphasis on
bimodal sediments. All optical sensors showed good performance with post-calibration RMS errors typically
below 10% of the range and R2
Pearson coefficients exceeding 95% (a=0.1). The Wetlabs produced the smallest
RMS errors, followed by the Troll (overall average ~4.3% and 5.8%, respectively), but the differences were not
significant. OBS-3+ performance was also good (overall average RMS error ~3%), while the Vector ADV
produced measurements with average RMS errors ~10.7% of the range for SSC up to 1 g/l, above which signal
saturation is likely to occur.
Description
Keywords
Turbidity Suspended sediment concentrations Nearshore processes Instrumentation Sediment dynamics Turbidity sensor
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Publisher
Coastal Education and Research Foundation (CERF)
