Publication
The effect of numerical aperture on quantitative use-wear studies and its implication on reproducibility
| dc.contributor.author | Calandra, Ivan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Schunk, Lisa | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bob, Konstantin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gneisinger, Walter | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pedergnana, Antonella | |
| dc.contributor.author | Paixão, Eduardo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hildebrandt, Andreas | |
| dc.contributor.author | Marreiros, Joao | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-20T14:48:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-05-20T14:48:08Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-04 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Many archeologists are skeptical about the capabilities of use-wear analysis to infer on the function of archeological tools, mainly because the method is seen as subjective, not standardized and not reproducible. Quantitative methods in particular have been developed and applied to address these issues. However, the importance of equipment, acquisition and analysis settings remains underestimated. One of those settings, the numerical aperture of the objective, has the potential to be one of the major factors leading to reproducibility issues. Here, experimental flint and quartzite tools were imaged using laser-scanning confocal microscopy with two objectives having the same magnification but different numerical apertures. The results demonstrate that 3D surface texture ISO 25178 parameters differ significantly when the same surface is measured with objectives having different numerical apertures. It is, however, unknown whether this property would blur or mask information related to use of the tools. Other acquisition and analyses settings are also discussed. We argue that to move use-wear analysis toward standardization, repeatability and reproducibility, the first step is to report all acquisition and analysis settings. This will allow the reproduction of use-wear studies, as well as tracing the differences between studies to given settings. | pt_PT |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Agência financiadora Romisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum -Leibniz Research Institute for Archaeology by German Federal and Rhineland Palatinate funding (Sondertatbestand "Spurenlabor") | pt_PT |
| dc.description.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | pt_PT |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41598-019-42713-w | pt_PT |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2045-2322 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/12527 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | pt_PT |
| dc.peerreviewed | yes | pt_PT |
| dc.publisher | Nature Publishing Group | pt_PT |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | pt_PT |
| dc.title | The effect of numerical aperture on quantitative use-wear studies and its implication on reproducibility | pt_PT |
| dc.type | journal article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| oaire.citation.issue | 1 | pt_PT |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 6313 | pt_PT |
| oaire.citation.title | Scientific Reports | pt_PT |
| oaire.citation.volume | 9 | pt_PT |
| person.familyName | Paixão | |
| person.familyName | Marreiros | |
| person.givenName | Eduardo | |
| person.givenName | Joao | |
| person.identifier.ciencia-id | 9413-2026-B9DA | |
| person.identifier.ciencia-id | 6A10-F340-45CF | |
| person.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-0850-1806 | |
| person.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-3399-8765 | |
| person.identifier.scopus-author-id | 57189389088 | |
| rcaap.rights | openAccess | pt_PT |
| rcaap.type | article | pt_PT |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 479b804d-e88c-41b7-99ec-1686bce469a3 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 7175a620-3c8f-4d97-bac3-cb2356f3f111 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 7175a620-3c8f-4d97-bac3-cb2356f3f111 |