Publication
An evaluation of the NANDA international, inc., diagnostic classification among spanish nurses: a cross-sectional study
| dc.contributor.author | Rodríguez Suárez, Claudio Alberto | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mariscal Crespo, María Isabel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hernández de Luis, María Naira | |
| dc.contributor.author | Costa, Emília Isabel | |
| dc.contributor.author | González de la Torre, Héctor | |
| dc.contributor.author | Camacho Bejarano, Rafaela | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-23T10:22:35Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-04-23T10:22:35Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-02-26 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background/Objectives: The NANDA International, Inc., (NANDA-I) diagnostic classification is the most widely used standardized nursing language internationally. The EVALUAN-I tool was developed to evaluate the NANDA-I diagnostic classification. The aim was to analyze the use of the NANDA-I diagnostic classification among Spanish nurses and assess its correlation with sociodemographic characteristics. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a non-probabilistic sample of Spanish nurses working in clinical, management, and academic settings using the EVALUAN-I tool (September 2019-December 2020). The analysis was conducted using R (R) (version 3.6.3, Lavaan package; R Core Team, 2020), with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (2019-190-1). Results: A total of 483 responses were obtained. There was a correlation between the intensity of use of NANDA-I and its application in practice (polychoric correlation = 0.50; p < 0.001). Nurses with a PhD degree considered nursing diagnoses to be less evidence-based (p = 0.037) but more useful (p = 0.035). Academic and research nurses stated that NANDA-I was more useful (p = 0.007), even for exclusive responsibilities (p = 0.034), and that it provided greater significance to diagnoses (p = 0.0012). Conclusions: NANDA-I is the most widely used standardized nursing language in Spain. Nurses' academic qualifications and work environment significantly influence their perceptions and use of NANDA-I. Advanced education fosters a critical yet positive perspective, highlighting a relationship between the intensity of its use, its application in clinical practice, and the nurse's educational background. Tools such as EVALUAN-I promote its integration and evidence-based practice, but challenges remain in improving perceptions, scientific evidence, and visibility in electronic health records to enhance its clinical impact and nursing recognition. | eng |
| dc.description.sponsorship | ENF-19/33 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/nursrep15030079 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2039-4403 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/27068 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.peerreviewed | yes | |
| dc.publisher | MDPI | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Nursing Reports | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | Standardized nursing terminology | |
| dc.subject | Nursing diagnosis | |
| dc.subject | Surveys and questionnaires | |
| dc.subject | Nursing methodology research | |
| dc.title | An evaluation of the NANDA international, inc., diagnostic classification among spanish nurses: a cross-sectional study | eng |
| dc.type | journal article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| oaire.citation.issue | 3 | |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 79 | |
| oaire.citation.title | Nursing Reports | |
| oaire.citation.volume | 15 | |
| oaire.version | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |
| person.familyName | Costa | |
| person.givenName | Emília Isabel | |
| person.identifier.ciencia-id | 191B-0BE8-473B | |
| person.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-4807-5277 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 3a77c586-d914-4007-b50c-4aa02b48c62f | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 3a77c586-d914-4007-b50c-4aa02b48c62f |