Repository logo
 
Publication

Local fishermen’s perceptions of the usefulness of artificial reef ecosystem services in Portugal

dc.contributor.authorRamos, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorLino, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorHimes-Cornell, Amber
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Miguel N.
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-02T12:39:54Z
dc.date.available2019-04-02T12:39:54Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractProponents of artificial reef (AR) deployment are often motivated by the usefulness of such structures. The usefulness of ARs is related to their capability of providing ecosystem services/additional functions. We present two distinct Portuguese AR case studies: (1) The Nazaré reef off the central coast of Portugal and (2) the Oura reef off the Algarve coast. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with local fishermen in the fishing towns of Nazaré and Quarteira pre-and post-AR deployment. The main focus of the interviews was to understand fishermen's perception of AR usefulness (or lack thereof) in terms of nine ecosystem services/additional functions potentially provided by the ARs. We tested the null hypothesis that ARs do not provide additional ecosystem services/additional functions. When queried pre-AR deployment, fishermen indicated that ARs are most likely to provide three ecosystem services: "habitat and refuge," "biodiversity preservation" and "food production." Fishermen had similar perceptions post-deployment. For the Nazaré reef, fishermen tended to have a positive or neutral perception of ecosystem services/additional functions being provided by ARs. For the Oura reef, fishermen tended to have a mostly neutral perception of AR ecosystem services; however, there were also some positive and other negative perceptions. It was difficult for stakeholders to conceptualize some of the ecosystem services/additional functions provided by ARs prior to actively using them. As a result, some stakeholders changed their perception of the ecosystem services/additional functions after using the structures. These results indicate that stakeholders likely need to perceive ARs as useful in order for them to provide their support for AR installation. Likewise, their support is often needed to justify the use of public funds to install ARs, therefore making it imperative for resource managers to undertake similar interviews with fishermen when considering the use of ARs in other areas.pt_PT
dc.description.sponsorshipMARE program, within the project "Implantacao e estudo integrado de sistemas recifais" PROMAR program "Elaboracao de estudos de caracterizacao do estado de colonizacao e impacto socioeconomico do recife artificial da Nazare" - 02-PE/2011/GJpt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.7717/peerj.6206pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn2167-8359
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/12434
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherPeerJpt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectArtificial reefspt_PT
dc.subjectDirect use valuept_PT
dc.subjectStakeholderspt_PT
dc.subjectEcosystem servicespt_PT
dc.subjectIndirect use valuept_PT
dc.subjectLocal fishermenpt_PT
dc.subjectLikert scalespt_PT
dc.subjectPortugalpt_PT
dc.subjectPerceptionpt_PT
dc.titleLocal fishermen’s perceptions of the usefulness of artificial reef ecosystem services in Portugalpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.awardURIinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/UID%2FSOC%2F04020%2F2013/PT
oaire.citation.startPagee6206pt_PT
oaire.citation.titlePeerJpt_PT
oaire.citation.volume6pt_PT
oaire.fundingStream5876
person.familyNameRamos
person.familyNameLino
person.givenNameJorge
person.givenNamePedro
person.identifier849968
person.identifier.ciencia-id2716-0804-58FC
person.identifier.ciencia-id3616-498C-1963
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5115-7919
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0214-6172
person.identifier.ridB-6065-2008
person.identifier.scopus-author-id6701691255
project.funder.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
project.funder.nameFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication58a47cf8-05b4-4dac-9764-bb5985066197
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5ccbc5f5-78c6-4443-b86f-dfdd573c9f9e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5ccbc5f5-78c6-4443-b86f-dfdd573c9f9e
relation.isProjectOfPublicationd929dde6-e7fa-4824-aba6-9f5e14a1e1be
relation.isProjectOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd929dde6-e7fa-4824-aba6-9f5e14a1e1be

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10.7717_peerj.6206.pdf
Size:
2.16 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.46 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: