Loading...
Publication
O sexismo ambivalente e os mitos da violência doméstica como preditores do direito de bater e da responsabilização da vítima de violência entre parceiros íntimos
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 572.31 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
A violência entre parceiros íntimos é um assunto muito estudado no meio académico, sendo a mulher a principal vítima. Com isso, cada vez mais se busca compreendê-la de forma a poder combater e diminuir os seus impactos negativos na sociedade. Porém, apesar de ser um problema social grave, muitas pessoas ainda possuem uma perceção de que o homem possui o direito de bater na sua companheira, o que pode ajudar a manter esta violência presente no dia a dia. Desta forma, este estudo teve como objetivo analisar a literatura existente sobre a perceção do direito do homem de bater, de forma a entender melhor a sua presença na sociedade, e verificar a sua relação e impacto que possui com outras variáveis relevantes na investigação da violência entre parceiros íntimos. A amostra foi composta por 119 participantes com idade igual ou superior a 18 anos. Os participantes responderam um questionário online no qual media as variáveis estudadas, são elas: Perceção de Direito de Bater, Mitos da Violência Doméstica, Responsabilidade da Mulher e do Homem, Apoio à Vítima e Sexismo Ambivalente. Os resultados demonstram que a perceção de direito teve boas relações com ideologias conservadoras da violência entre parceiros íntimos e além de ter efeitos mediadores significativos entre elas. Além disso, foi possível verificar que o sexismo ambivalente e os mitos da violência doméstica foram preditores significativos do direito de bater.
Intimate partner violence is a subject widely studied in academia, with women being the main victim. As a result, it is increasingly sought to understand it to combat and reduce its negative impacts on society. However, despite being a serious social problem, many people still have a perception that the man has the right to beat his partner, which can help to keep this violence present in everyday life. In this way, this study aimed to analyze the existing literature on the perception of man's right to beat, to better understand its presence in society, and to verify its relationship and impact it has with other relevant variables in the investigation of Intimate partner violence. The sample consisted of 119 participants aged 18 years or older. Participants answered an online questionnaire that measured the variables studied, they are Perception of Right to Beat, Domestic Violence Myths, Responsibility of Women and Men, Victim Support and Ambivalent Sexism. The results demonstrate that the Perception of Right to Beat had good relations with conservative ideologies of intimate partner violence, in addition to having significant mediating effects between them. In addition, it was possible to verify that ambivalent sexism and myths of domestic violence were significant predictors of the right to hit.
Intimate partner violence is a subject widely studied in academia, with women being the main victim. As a result, it is increasingly sought to understand it to combat and reduce its negative impacts on society. However, despite being a serious social problem, many people still have a perception that the man has the right to beat his partner, which can help to keep this violence present in everyday life. In this way, this study aimed to analyze the existing literature on the perception of man's right to beat, to better understand its presence in society, and to verify its relationship and impact it has with other relevant variables in the investigation of Intimate partner violence. The sample consisted of 119 participants aged 18 years or older. Participants answered an online questionnaire that measured the variables studied, they are Perception of Right to Beat, Domestic Violence Myths, Responsibility of Women and Men, Victim Support and Ambivalent Sexism. The results demonstrate that the Perception of Right to Beat had good relations with conservative ideologies of intimate partner violence, in addition to having significant mediating effects between them. In addition, it was possible to verify that ambivalent sexism and myths of domestic violence were significant predictors of the right to hit.
Description
Keywords
Perceção de direito de bater Violência entre parceiros íntimos Violência doméstica Sexismo Fundamentos da moralidade