Are we getting less sexist? a ten-year gap comparison analysis of sexism in a Portuguese sample

Gomes, Alexandra; Gonçalves, Gabriela; Sousa, Cátia; Vieira dos Santos, J.; Giger, Jean-Christophe

http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/19255

Use this identifier to reference this record.

Name:	Description:	Size:	Format:
00332941211011073 (1).pdf		517.52 KB	Adobe PDF	Download

Send Feedback

Authors

Gomes, Alexandra

Gonçalves, Gabriela

Sousa, Cátia

Vieira dos Santos, J.

Giger, Jean-Christophe

Abstract(s)

Widely and slowly, discrimination against women based upon gender has become socially unacceptable. However, less is known about how sexist beliefs have progressed in the last years and if we are responding to this social antagonizing of a sexist discourse. Our goal was to verify the existence of differences in ambivalent sexism and neosexism over a ten-year gap in a Portuguese adult sample and to assess possible modifications in the relationship between the variables. A cross-sectional, correlational study was conducted using two independent groups, with measures taken in 2009 and then in 2019. Both groups were invariant in terms of average age and proportion of sexes. Our results show a decrease in hostile and benevolent forms of sexism, while neosexism remains constant. The relationships between variables suggest that sexist beliefs are changing to accommodate subtler and modernized forms of sexism, like neosexism, that deny the existence of discrimination against women, resent discrimination complaints, and maintain a paternalistic view of women. Neosexism also seems to have a stronger correlation with hostile sexism than with benevolent forms of sexism in the male subsample. This relationship is stronger for the 2019 sample. These relationships suggest that sexism is more deeply rooted than we would like to admit and adapts to social discourse. Despite our best efforts, it is yet to be overcome.