Repository logo
 
Publication

EEG-based neurofeedback in athletes and non-athletes: a scoping review of outcomes and methodologies

dc.contributor.authorGuerreiro Zacarias, Rui Manuel
dc.contributor.authorBulathwatta, Darshika Thejani
dc.contributor.authorBidzan-Bluma, Ilona
dc.contributor.authorNeves de Jesus, Saúl
dc.contributor.authorCorreia, Joao
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-22T13:07:05Z
dc.date.available2025-12-22T13:07:05Z
dc.date.issued2025-11-03
dc.description.abstractBackground: Electroencephalography (EEG) is a non-invasive technique that records millisecond-scale cortical electrical activity using scalp electrodes. In EEG-based neurofeedback (NFB), these signals are processed to provide real-time feedback that supports self-regulation of targeted brain rhythms; evidence suggests improvements in cognitive and neurophysiological performance in athletes and non-athletes. However, methodological inconsistencies—such as limited blinding, poor sham control, and outdated approaches to EEG spectral analysis—restrict reproducibility and hinder cumulative progress in the field. Methods: This scoping review aimed to identify and analyze the methodological characteristics, outcome measures, and reproducibility gaps in EEG-based NFB studies involving athletes and non-athletes. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we systematically searched academic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library), as well as gray literature sources (ProQuest Dissertations, LILACS, Tripdatabase, and Google Scholar). Of 48 included studies, 44 were published in international peer-reviewed journals and 4 in regional journals. Data were extracted on study design, participant population, NFB protocols, targeted EEG rhythms, cognitive and neurophysiological outcomes, and methodological rigor. Results: The review revealed substantial heterogeneity in targeted rhythms, protocols, and reporting standards. None of the studies employed modern spectral parameterization methods (e.g., FOOOF), while only 29% used active sham protocols and 6% employed inert sham conditions. Reporting blinding procedures and follow-up assessments was limited or absent in most studies. Discussion: This review highlights critical methodological shortcomings that may bias interpretations of NFB effects in sport and cognitive domains. To strengthen future research, studies should rigorously implement sham and blinding procedures, ensure transparent reporting of EEG metrics, and adopt open-science practices, including modern approaches to spectral parameterization.eng
dc.description.sponsorship101089757—SEA-EU 2.0
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/bioengineering12111202
dc.identifier.issn2306-5354
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/28010
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.ispartofBioengineering
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectNeurofeedback
dc.subjectEEG
dc.subjectSham control
dc.subjectReproducibility
dc.subjectCognitive performance
dc.subjectSports performance
dc.titleEEG-based neurofeedback in athletes and non-athletes: a scoping review of outcomes and methodologieseng
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue11
oaire.citation.startPage1202
oaire.citation.titleBioengineering
oaire.citation.volume12
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
person.familyNameGuerreiro Zacarias
person.familyNameNeves de Jesus
person.familyNameCorreia
person.givenNameRui Manuel
person.givenNameSaúl
person.givenNameJoao
person.identifier.ciencia-id9A12-2DA2-4C0F
person.identifier.ciencia-id6417-495C-B044
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5542-9600
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2019-1011
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6624-7012
relation.isAuthorOfPublication70f37c2c-51c9-4828-9e87-6f4aa862802a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication440a7f91-c74d-472c-8228-0c2db46d6cbb
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationaf3ec6e1-51fb-4aa8-8c57-54cb3056f45d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery440a7f91-c74d-472c-8228-0c2db46d6cbb

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
bioengineering-12-01202.pdf
Size:
2.34 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.46 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: