Repository logo
 
Publication

The DistoX2: a methodological solution to archaeological mapping in poorly accessible environments

dc.contributor.authorAlmeida-Warren, Katarina
dc.contributor.authorBraun, David R.
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Susana
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-25T13:39:42Z
dc.date.available2021-03-25T13:39:42Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractSpatial information is crucial to archaeological field research. From the plane-table to the total station, recent technological advances have enabled data collection to become fully digital and highly accurate. Nevertheless, the recent expansion of archaeological expeditions to novel environments often incompatible with modern mapping equipment, e.g. tropical forests or ephemeral shorelines, calls for further methodological innovations. Such projects, as well as those under logistic or financial limitations, are still largely reliant on more time consuming, less accurate, traditional approaches, e.g. offset or tape and compass methods. The DistoX2 is a digital, highly portable, and versatile hand-held instrument originally developed for speleological surveys where total stations and DGPSs are not feasible. However, the potential of the DistoX2 system as a spatial mapping tool in above-ground contexts has been surprisingly overlooked. Here, we present a first assessment of the applicability of the DistoX2 for archaeological mapping in non-speleological environments. We investigate precision and accuracy in controlled above-ground settings relative to two common methods of data collection - total station, and tape and compass. We test the relative precision of the DistoX2 when mounted on a tripod or operated in hand-held mode and discuss its applicability, and potential combined used, in the context of other increasingly popular methods - GNSS and SfM photogrammetry. With a mean error of approximate to 5.00 cm for horizontal readings and approximate to 2.00 cm for vertical readings, the DistoX2 is considerably more accurate than the tape and compass method (mu approximate to 67.00 cm horizontal; mu approximate to 3.00 cm vertical). While the DistoX2 exceeds the error thresholds of projects that require high spatial sensitivity (e.g. Palaeolithic excavations), it provides a reliable, low-cost and more accurate alternative to many projects that resort to more traditional methods. This fills an existent methodological and financial gap amongst the growing diversity of archaeological expeditions.pt_PT
dc.description.sponsorshipSFRH/BD/115085/2016; UIDB/04211/2020; EC-399R-18pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102688pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn2352-409X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/15284
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectLow-cost spatial mappingpt_PT
dc.subjectSurveyingpt_PT
dc.subjectField methodspt_PT
dc.subjectArchaeological recordingpt_PT
dc.subjectPoint proveniencept_PT
dc.titleThe DistoX2: a methodological solution to archaeological mapping in poorly accessible environmentspt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.startPage102688pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Archaeological Science: Reportspt_PT
oaire.citation.volume35pt_PT
person.familyNameAlmeida-Warren
person.familyNameCarvalho
person.givenNameKatarina
person.givenNameSusana
person.identifier356037
person.identifier.ciencia-idCE16-6ABB-6B91
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7634-9466
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1300-1953
person.identifier.ridF-3872-2016
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57194591412
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationfb54d32a-6dc8-4ac2-a9b6-1412166f8914
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationdf445e58-ed96-4e28-9be9-f8515e41f5c0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryfb54d32a-6dc8-4ac2-a9b6-1412166f8914

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Journal of Archaeological Science Reports.pdf
Size:
4.84 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format