The influence of formal education and literacy on the cognitive system and its cerebral substrates

Funder

Organizational Unit

Publications

Semantic interference on a phonological task in illiterate subjects

Publication . Reis, Alexandra; Faísca, Luís; Mendonca, Susana; Ingvar, Martin; Petersson, Karl Magnus

Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2007, 48, 69–74 DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00544.x © 2007 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2007 The Scandinavian Psychological Associations. Published by Blackwell Publishing L td., 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA. ISSN 0036-5564. Blackwell Publishing Ltd Health and Disability Semantic interference on a phonological task in illiterate subjects ALEXANDRA REIS, 1,2,3 L UÍS FAÍSCA, 2,3 SUSANA MENDONÇA, 2 MARTIN INGVAR 1 and KARL MAGNUS PETERSSON 1,3,4 1 Cognitive Neurophysiology Research Group, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden 2 Cognitive Neuroscience Research Group, Departamento de Psicologia, Faculdade de Ciências Humanas e Sociais, Universidade do Alg arve, Faro, Por tugal 3 Center for Intelligent Systems, Universidade do Algarve, Faro, Portugal 4 F. C. Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands R eis, A., Faísca, L., Mendonça, S., Ingvar, M. & Petersson, K. M. (2007). Semantic interference on a phonological task in illit erate subjects. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology , 48 , 69–74. Previous research suggests that learning an alphabetic written language influences aspects of the auditory-verbal language syste m. In this study, we e xamined whether literacy influences the notion of words as phonological units independent of lexical semantics in literate a nd illiterate subjects. Subjects had to decide which item in a word- or pseudoword pair was phonologically longest. By manipulating the relat ionship between r eferent size and phonological length in three word conditions (congruent, neutral, and incongruent) we could examine to what e xtent subjects f ocused on form rather than meaning of the stimulus material. Moreover, the pseudoword condition allowed us to examine global p honological aw areness independent of lexical semantics. The results showed that literate performed significantly better than illiterate subj ects in the neutral and incongruent word conditions as well as in the pseudoword condition. The illiterate group performed least well in the incong ruent condition and significantly better in the pseudoword condition compared to the neutral and incongruent word conditions and suggest that pe rformance on phonological word length comparisons is dependent on literacy. In addition, the results show that the illiter a te participant s are able to perceive and process phonological length, albeit less well than the literate subjects, when no semantic interference is present . In conclusion, the present results confirm and extend the finding that illiterate subjects are biased towards semantic-conceptual-pragmatic type s of cognitive processing

2007Journal article

Restricted

Educational level, socioeconomic status and aphasia research: A comment on Connor et al. (2001) - Effect of socioeconomic status on aphasia severity and recovery

Publication . Reis, Alexandra; Petersson, Karl Magnus

Is there a relation between socioeconomic factors and aphasia severity and recovery? Connor, Obler, Tocco, Fitzpatrick, and Albert (2001) describe correlations between the educational level and socioeconomic status of aphasic subjects with aphasia severity and subsequent recovery. As stated in the introduction by Connor et al. (2001), studies of the influence of educational level and literacy (or illiteracy) on aphasia severity have yielded conflicting results, while no significant link between socioeconomic status and aphasia severity and recovery has been established. In this brief note, we will comment on their findings and conclusions, beginning first with a brief review of literacy and aphasia research, and complexities encountered in these fields of investigation. This serves as a general background to our specific comments on Connor et al. (2001), which will be focusing on methodological issues and the importance of taking normative values in consideration when subjects with different socio-cultural or socio-economic backgrounds are assessed. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

2003-12Other

Open Access

The effects of literacy and education on the quantitative and qualitative aspects of semantic verbal fluency

Publication . Mendonça, Alexandra; Bramão, Inês; Faísca, Luís; Petersson, Karl Magnus; Reis, Alexandra

Semantic verbal fluency tasks are commonly used in neuropsychological assessment. Investigations of the influence of level of literacy have not yielded consistent results in the literature. This prompted us to investigate the ecological relevance of task specifics, in particular, the choice of semantic criteria used. Two groups of literate and illiterate subjects were compared on two verbal fluency tasks using different semantic criteria. The performance on a food criterion (supermarket fluency task), considered more ecologically relevant for the two literacy groups, and an animal criterion (animal fluency task) were compared. The data were analysed using both quantitative and qualitative measures. The quantitative analysis indicated that the two literacy groups performed equally well on the supermarket fluency task. In contrast, results differed significantly during the animal fluency task. The qualitative analyses indicated differences between groups related to the strategies used, especially with respect to the animal fluency task. The overall results suggest that there is not a substantial difference between literate and illiterate subjects related to the fundamental workings of semantic memory. However, there is indication that the content of semantic memory reflects differences in shared cultural background – in other words, formal education –, as indicated by the significant interaction between level of literacy and semantic criterion.

2004Journal article

Restricted

Color makes a difference: two-dimensional object naming in literate and illiterate subjects

Publication . Reis, Alexandra; Faísca, Luís; Ingvar, Martin; Petersson, Karl Magnus

Previous work has shown that illiterate subjects are better at naming two-dimensional representations of real objects when presented as colored photos as compared to black and white drawings. This raises the question if color or textural details selectively improve object recognition and naming in illiterate compared to literate subjects. In this study, we investigated whether the surface texture and/or color of objects is used to access stored object knowledge in illiterate subjects. A group of illiterate subjects and a matched literate control group were compared on an immediate object naming task with four conditions: color and black and white (i.e., grey-scaled) photos, as well as color and black and white (i.e., grey-scaled) drawings of common everyday objects. The results show that illiterate subjects perform signiWcantly better when the stimuli are colored and this eVect is independent of the photographic detail. In addition, there were signiWcant diVerences between the literacy groups in the black and white condition for both drawings and photos. These results suggest that color object information contributes to object recognition. This eVect was particularly prominent in the illiterate group.

2006Journal article

Restricted

The impact of reading and writing skills on a visual-motor integration task: a comparison between illiterate and literate subjects

Publication . Bramão, Inês; Petersson, Karl Magnus; Faísca, Luís; Ingvar, Martin; Mendonça, Alexandra; Reis, Alexandra

Previous studies have shown a significant association between reading skills and the performance on visuo-motor tasks. In order to clarify whether reading and writing skills modulate non-linguistic domains, we investigated the performance of two literacy groups on a visuo-motor integration task with non-linguistic stimuli. Twenty-one illiterate participants and twenty matched literate controls were included in the experiment. Subjects were instructed to use the right or the left index finger to point to and touch a randomly presented target on the right or left side of a touch screen. The results showed that the literate subjects were significantly faster in detecting and touching targets on the left compared to the right side of the screen. In contrast, the presentation side did not affect the performance of the illiterate group. These results lend support to the idea that having acquired reading and writing skills, and thus a preferred left-to-right reading direction, influences visual scanning.

2007Journal article

Open Access