Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Marine protected areas and maritime spatial planning integration dynamics across Europe

datacite.subject.sdg14:Proteger a Vida Marinha
datacite.subject.sdg13:Ação Climática
datacite.subject.sdg12:Produção e Consumo Sustentáveis
dc.contributor.authorCalado, Helena
dc.contributor.authorDias Gois Rodrigues de Queiroz, Joyce
dc.contributor.authorGutierrez, Débora
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Anna Larissa
dc.contributor.authorPegorelli, Camila
dc.contributor.authorRaedemaecker, Fien De
dc.contributor.authorBarboza, Francisco Rafael
dc.contributor.authorWithouck, Inne
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Sanabria, Javier
dc.contributor.authorZaucha, Jacek
dc.contributor.authorStancheva, Margarita
dc.contributor.authorMarkovic, Marina
dc.contributor.authorBocci, Martina
dc.contributor.authorHaapasaari, Päivi
dc.contributor.authorVarjopuro, Riku
dc.contributor.authorSpinu, Alina Daiana
dc.contributor.authorStojanovic, Ivana
dc.contributor.authorQuintela, Adriano
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-30T16:46:17Z
dc.date.available2026-09-30T16:46:17Z
dc.date.issued2026-08-26
dc.description.abstractMaritime Spatial Planning (MSP) has emerged as a central governance tool to balance ecological, social, and economic uses of marine space, while Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) remain essential for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem resilience. Effective integration of MPAs into MSP can enhance conservation outcomes and reduce conflicts with human activities, yet the degree of integration across the European Union (EU) remains highly uneven. This study examines how MPAs are embedded within national MSP frameworks in 20 EU Member States, aiming to classify, compare, and explain differences in integration levels. A typology of four integration levels is introduced, ranging from MPAs as primary drivers of MSP to their treatment as passive spatial layers. The methodology combines the development and application of a set of questions directed at MSP experts with the use of a decision tree and allocation criteria designed to assess responses and classify countries according to their level of MPA–MSP integration. Results reveal substantial disparities across EU Member States. Belgium, Germany, Latvia, Slovenia, Sweden and the Netherlands showed the strongest degree of integration, with conservation objectives embedded in MSP provisions and influencing cross-sectoral planning decisions. In contrast, most countries incorporated MPAs mainly through environmental assessment instruments or treated them as existing spatial layers, environmental constraints, or separate legal instruments. Key barriers include fragmented governance structures, limited translation of environmental assessments into binding spatial decisions, weak links between MSP and MPAs management, uneven monitoring and enforcement capacity, and limited mechanisms for stakeholder coordination. Advancing MPA–MSP integration requires stronger legal frameworks, adaptive management strategies, ecological connectivity, and inclusive governance processes. By providing a systematic comparison and highlighting best practices, this study provides recommendations to foster more cohesive, resilient, and biodiversity-informed marine governance.eng
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.marpol.2026.107272
dc.identifier.issn0308-597X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/29561
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofMarine Policy
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectOcean governance
dc.subjectMaritime spatial planning
dc.subjectMarine protected areas
dc.subjectMarine policy
dc.subjectConservation
dc.titleMarine protected areas and maritime spatial planning integration dynamics across Europeeng
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.startPage107272
oaire.citation.titleMarine Policy
oaire.citation.volume195
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
person.familyNameDias Gois Rodrigues de Queiroz
person.familyNameGutierrez
person.givenNameJoyce
person.givenNameDébora
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6478-1801
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1311-5459
relation.isAuthorOfPublication52e1a3fb-2a72-498f-8ee0-e17da0a8179e
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa2c1aed3-6405-4b10-a040-1714a4f3bb9c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery52e1a3fb-2a72-498f-8ee0-e17da0a8179e

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura indisponível
Nome:
1-s2.0-S0308597X26002423-main.pdf
Tamanho:
2.57 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Licença
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura indisponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
3.46 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: