Repository logo
 
Publication

Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results

dc.contributor.authorPardal, Raquel Constantino
dc.contributor.authorAbrantes, António
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Luís Pedro
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, Rui
dc.contributor.authorAzevedo, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorFigueiredo, Teresa Leonor
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Sónia
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-07T15:15:35Z
dc.date.available2022-07-07T15:15:35Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractTo compare the capacity of mammography, sonoelastography, B-mode ultrasonography and histological analysis to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions. Materials and Methods: A total of 12 histopathologically confirmed breast lesions were documented. The lesions were assessed by means of mammography, B-mode ultrasonography and sonoelastography, and histopathological analysis was utilized as a gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the mentioned techniques. Results: Sensitivity and specificity in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions were respectively 100% and 50% for mammography, 100% and 71% for B-mode ultrasonography, and 67% and 83% for sonoelastography. The area under the ROC curve was calculated for the three imaging modalities and corresponded to 0.792 for mammography, 0.847 for B-mode ultrasonography, and 0.806 for sonoelastography. Conclusion: Sonoelastography demonstrated higher specificity and lower sensitivity as compared with mammography and B-mode ultrasonography. On the other hand, B-mode ultrasonography had the largest area under the ROC curve. Sonoelastography has demonstrated to be a promising technique to detect and evaluate breast lesions, and could potentially reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S0100-39842013000400007pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/17927
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectBreast B-mode ultrasonographypt_PT
dc.subjectBreast lesionspt_PT
dc.subjectMammographypt_PT
dc.subjectSensitivitypt_PT
dc.subjectSpecificitypt_PT
dc.subjectSonoelastographypt_PT
dc.titleScreening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological resultspt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage220pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue4pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage214pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleRadiologia Brasileirapt_PT
oaire.citation.volume46pt_PT
person.familyNameCaldeira Lagem Abrantes
person.familyNameRibeiro
person.familyNameAlmeida
person.familyNamedo Espírito Santo Rodrigues
person.givenNameAntónio Fernando
person.givenNameLuís Pedro
person.givenNameRui
person.givenNameSónia Isabel
person.identifier2176242
person.identifier.ciencia-idE514-87C6-9772
person.identifier.ciencia-idC815-8A07-1950
person.identifier.ciencia-id0113-F406-B03C
person.identifier.ciencia-id3F12-ED24-173C
person.identifier.ciencia-idF615-E60D-9A5C
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7792-678X
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6967-0534
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7524-9669
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9431-1402
person.identifier.ridA-6697-2016
person.identifier.scopus-author-id58401765500
person.identifier.scopus-author-id55556024200
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione7ff7891-8e5b-4849-89bd-0c6195bd1c72
relation.isAuthorOfPublication34d8529e-10eb-468a-b4a4-f652d90be308
relation.isAuthorOfPublication61d38bec-7094-4511-9b37-d8d0ffb9586f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication23612f60-6de2-4e1c-a410-949875005828
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8770601c-19ac-49c6-8c52-d1c7031ba6a9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8770601c-19ac-49c6-8c52-d1c7031ba6a9

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
document.pdf
Size:
273.89 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format